We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Paul Bouissac, Circus and culture: A semiotic approach. (Advances in Semiotics, edited by Thomas A. Sebeok.) Bloomington and London: University of Indiana Press, 1976. Pp. xiii+206.
Review products
Paul Bouissac, Circus and culture: A semiotic approach. (Advances in Semiotics, edited by Thomas A. Sebeok.) Bloomington and London: University of Indiana Press, 1976. Pp. xiii+206.
Published online by Cambridge University Press:
18 December 2008
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
REFERENCES
Bergson, H. (1956). Laughter: An essay on comedy. Garden City: Anchor.Google Scholar
Bishop, G. (1976). The world of the downs. Los Angeles: Brooke House.Google Scholar
Bricker, V. (1973). Ritual humor in Highland Chiapas. Austin and London: University of Texas.Google Scholar
Coup, C. W. (1901). Sawdust and spangles: Stories and secrets of the circus. Washington, DC: Rudell (1961).Google Scholar
Ducharte, P. (1929). The Italian comedy. New York: Dover (1966).Google Scholar
Fenner, M., & Fenner, W. (1970). The circus. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Laski, V. (1958). Seeking life. Philadelphia: The American Folklore Society.Google Scholar
Newton, D. (1958). Clowns. London, Toronto, Wellington, Sydney: George Harrap.Google Scholar
Nicoll, A. (1963). The world of harlequin. Cambridge, London, New York, Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Parsons, E. C., & Beals, R. C. (1934). The sacred clowns of the Pueblo and Mayo-Yaqui Indians. The American Anthropologist36. 491–514. Washington, DC: American Anthropological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar