No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Janis Nuckolls & Lev Michael (eds.), Evidentiality in interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2014. Pp. v, 199. Hb. €85, $126.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 August 2015
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Book Reviews
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015
References
REFERENCES
Blythe, Joe (2013). Preference organization driving structuration: Evidence from Australian Aboriginal interaction for pragmatically motivated grammaticalization. Language 89:883–919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chafe, Wallace, & Nichols, Johanna (1986). Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology. Hillsdale, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Cornillie, Bert (2009). Evidentiality and epistemic modality: On the close relationship between two different categories. Functions of Language 16:44–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, N. J., & Levinson, Stephen C. (2009). The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32:429–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heritage, John, & Raymond, Geoffrey (2005). The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in talk-in-interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly 68(1):15–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaffe, Alexandra (ed.) (2009). Stance: Sociolinguistic perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, Stephen C. (1988). Putting linguistics on a proper footing: Explorations in Goffman's participation framework. In Drew, Paul & Wootton, Anthony (eds.), Erving Goffman: Exploring the interaction order, 161–227. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Nuckolls, Janis B. (2008). Deictic selves and others in Pastaza Quichua evidential usage. Anthropological Linguistics 50:67–89.Google Scholar
Speas, Margaret (2008). On the syntax and semantics of evidentials. Language and Linguistics Compass 2:940–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar