Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T21:49:59.815Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Idiomaticity and functional variation: A case study of international amateur radio talk

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

Dafydd Gibbon
Dafydd Gibbon
Affiliation:
University of Göttingen
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The linguistic domain of idiomaticity poses many problems for the study of language form, use, and variation. With selected aspects of idiomaticity as a starting point, I will attempt in this paper to develop a description of the use of idioms as a segment of a more general theory of language use. Evidence for this approach is drawn from international amateur radio talk (IART) in English.

Type
Articles
Information
Language in Society , Volume 10 , Issue 1 , April 1981 , pp. 21 - 42
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Arewa, E. O., & Dundes, A. (1964). Proverbs and the ethnography of speaking folklore. In Gumperz, J. J. & Hymes, D. (eds.). The ethnography of communication. American Anthropologist Special Publication 66:6, Pt. 2. Menasha: American Anthropological Association, 70–85.Google Scholar
A.R.R.L. (1977). The radio amateur's handbook. Newington. Conn.: American Radio Relay League.Google Scholar
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Blom, J.-P.. & Gumperz, J. J. (1972). Social meaning in linguistic structures: Code-switching in Norway. In Gumperz, J. J. & Hymes, D. (eds.). Directions in Sociolinguistics. N. Y.: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 407–34.Google Scholar
Bolinger, D. L. (1950). Rime, assonance and morpheme analysis. Word 6: 117–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bublitz, W. (1978). Ausdrucksweisen der Sprechereinstellung im Deurschen und Englischen. Untersuchungen zur Syntax, Semantik und Pragmatik der deutschen Modalpartikeln und Vergewisserungsfragen und ihrer Englischen Entsprechungen. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Bühler, K. (1934). Sprachtheorie. Die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache. Stuttgart: Fischer.Google Scholar
Burger, H. (1973). Idiomatik des Deutschen. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Chao, Y.-R. (1956). Tone, intonation, singsong, chanting, recitative, tonal composition and atonal composition in Chinese. In Halle, M., Lunt, H., & McLean, H., (eds.), For Roman Jakobson. The Hague: Mouton. 52–59.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Crystal, D., & Davy, D. (1969). Investigating English style. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Danes, F. (1960). Sentence intonation from a functional point of view. Word 16: 34–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, S. (1973). Toward a grammar for dyadic conversation. Semiotica 9 29–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, J., & Ure, J. N. (1969). Language varieties: Register. In Meetham, A. R., ed., Encyclopaedia of Linguistics, Information and Control. London: Pergamon Press. 251–9.Google Scholar
Ervin-Tripp, S. (1964). An analysis of the interaction of language, topic, and listener. In Gumperz, J. J. & Hymes, D.. (eds.), The ethnography of communication. American Anthropologist Special Publication 66:6, Pt. 2. Menasha: American Anthropological Association, 86–102.Google Scholar
Ferguson, C. A. (1977). Baby talk as a simplified register. In Snow, C. E. & Ferguson, C. A., (eds.), Talking to Children. Language input and Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 209–35.Google Scholar
Fillmore, L. W. (1976). Individual differences in second language acquisition. Asilomar Conference on Individual Differences in Language Ability and Language Behavior.Monterey. Calif.Google Scholar
Firth, J. R. (1968). Linguistics and translation. In Palmer, F. R., (ed.), Selected Papers of J. R. Firih 1952–59. London: Longman. 84–95.Google Scholar
Fraser, B. (1970). Idioms within a transformational grammar. Foundations of Language 6: 22–42.Google Scholar
Gibbon, D. (1976a). Perspectives of intonation analysis. Bern: Lang.Google Scholar
Gibbon, D. (1976b). Performatory categories in contrastive intonation analysis. In Chitoran, D. (ed), Second International Conference of English Contrastive Projects. Bucharest: Bucharest University Press and Washington: Center for Applied Linguistics, 145–56.Google Scholar
Gibbon, D. (in press). Violations of Frege's Principle and their significance for contrastive semantics. Papers and Studies in Contrastive Linguistics (Poznań).Google Scholar
Gülich, E., & Henke, K. (1980). Sprachliche Routine in der Alltagskommunikation. Uberlegungen zu “pragmatischen idiomen” am Beispiel des Englischen und Französischen. Vol. I, II. Die Neueren Sprachen 78 (1979): 513–30; 79(1980): 2–33.Google Scholar
Hall, E. T. (1964). Adumbration as a feature of intercultural communication. In Gumperz, J. J. & Hymes, D. (eds.), The ethnography of communication. American Anthropologist Special Publication 66:6, Pt. 2. Menasha: American Anthropological Association, 137–53.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (1967). Notes on transitivity and theme in English. Journal of Linguistics 2: 37–81; 3 199–244; 4:179–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K.(1975). Learning how to mean: Explorations in the development of language. London: Arnold.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K., McIntosh, A., & Strevens, P. (1964). The linguistic sciences and language teaching. London: Longman.Google Scholar
H. M. S. O. (1938). General Post Office handbook for wireless operators working installations licensed by His Majesty's Postmaster General. London: His Majesty's Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Hockett, C. F. (1955). A manual of phonology. International Journal of Linguistics, Memoir II. Baltimore: Waverley Press.Google Scholar
Hockett, C. F. (1956). Idiom formation. In Halle, M., Lunt, H., & McLean, H., (eds.), For Roman Jakobson. The Hague: Mouton, 222–9.Google Scholar
Hockett, C. F. (1958). A course in modern linguistics. New York: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hymes, D., (ed.). (1971). Pidginization and creolization of languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hymes, D.,(1972). Models of the interaction of language and social life. In Gumperz, J. J., & Hymes, D., (eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 35–71.Google Scholar
Hymes, D.,(1975). Pre-war Prague school and post-war American anthropological linguistics. In Koerner, E. F. K., (ed), The transformational-generative paradigm and modern linguistic theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 359–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1960). Closing statement: Linguistics and poetics. In Sebeok, T. A., ed, Style in language. Cambridge. Mass.: M.I.T. Press, 350–77.Google Scholar
Katz, J. J., & Postal, P. M. (1963). Semantic interpretation of idioms and sentences containing them. M.I.T. Research Laboratory of Electronics Quarterly Progress Report 70: 275–82.Google Scholar
Klein, W.Variation in der Sprache. Ein Verfahren zu ihrer Beschreibung. Kronberg: Scriptor.Google Scholar
Krashen, S., & Scarcella, R. (1978). On routines and patterns in language acquisition and performance. Language Learning 28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, W. (1972). Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Ladd, D. L. (1978). Stylized intonation. Language 54: 517–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leech, G. N. (1966). English in advertising: A linguistic study of advertising in Great Britain. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. (1972). General semantics. In Davidson, D. & Harman, G., (eds.), Semantics of natural language. Dordrecht: Reidel, 129–218.Google Scholar
Makkai, A. (1972). Idiom structure in English. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malkiel, Y. (1959). Studies in irreversible binomials. Lingua 8:113–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marchand, H. (1960). Categories and types of English word-formation: A synchronic-diachronic approach. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Newmeyer, F. J. (1977) The regularity of idiom behavior. Lingua 34: 327–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, A. M. (1977). Language learning strategies: Does the whole equal the sum of the parts? Language 53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sacks, H.. Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G.A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50: 696–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sadock, J. M. (1974). Toward a linguistic theory of speech acts. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, J. R. (1976). Review of Sadock (1974) Language 52: 966–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shannon, C. E. (1949). The mathematical theory of communication. In Shannon, C. E. & Weaver, W., (eds.), The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 29–125.Google Scholar
Sinclair, J. M., & Coulthard, R. M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse. The English used by teachers and pupils. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, J. J.Male and female ways of speaking: Elaborately restricted codes in a CB speech community. Papers in Linguistics. international Journal of Human Communication 12 163–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, L. P. (1925). Words and idioms: Studies in the English language. London: Constable.Google Scholar
Weinreich, U. (1966). Problems in the analysis of idioms. In Puhvel, J., ed., Substance and structure of language: Lectures delivered before the Linguistic Society of America at UCLA 1966. Berkeley: University of California Press, 114–71.Google Scholar
Yngve, V. (1970). On getting a word in edgewise. Papers from the Sixth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 567–78.Google Scholar