Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T03:11:13.925Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Generic reference and social ontology in Vietnamese conversation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 August 2021

Jack Sidnell Open the ORCID record for Jack Sidnell [Opens in a new window]
Jack Sidnell*
Affiliation:
University of Toronto, Canada
*
Address for correspondence: Jack Sidnell, Department of Anthropology, University of Toronto, 19 Russell St., Toronto, Ontario, M5S 2S2, Canada[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Generic expressions play a key role in the interactional articulation, social circulation, and temporal reproduction of ideology. Here I examine fragments from a conversation between four middle-class participants which took place at a café in Hanoi. After briefly describing the particular grammatico-textual patterns by which specific and generic references are accomplished in Vietnamese, I turn to consider two extended stretches of talk in which these people weave generic reference into the warp and weft of their interaction. I argue that generic reference is intimately tied to social ontology which consists, in part, of ideas about distinct and essentialized ‘kinds of persons’. Deployed in what appears, on the surface at least, as ordinary, mundane conversation, not only does such generic reference serve to position those referred to as ‘ontological other’ (Wynter 1987), it also constitutes an ‘act of alterity’ (Hastings & Manning 2004) by which the participants tacitly characterize themselves. (Reference, Vietnamese, social ontology, alterity, stereotype, essentialism)*

Type
Articles
Information
Language in Society , Volume 50 , Special Issue 4: The Generic , September 2021 , pp. 533 - 555
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Most of what I have to say here developed in conversation with Chip Zuckerman. I thank him for generously sharing his ideas and for several rounds of commentary on the present article. I also thank the other contributors to this special issue, Luke Fleming, Hy Van Luong, Minh Nguyen and the students in my graduate seminar in linguistic anthropology (Ali Azhar, James Booker, Lynda Chubak, Sara Hamed, Joe Wilson), as well as two anonymous reviewers for the journal for very helpful comments and suggestions. For help with transcription and analysis of the materials discussed here I thank An Thùy Trần, Hương Thị Thanh Vũ and Thanh Hà Nguyễn.

References

REFERENCES

Acton, Eric (2019). Pragmatics and the social life of the English definite article. Language 95(1):37–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agha, Asif (2007). Language and social relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Alves, Mark, & Nguyễn, Hương Duy (2007). Notes on Thanh-Chương Vietnamese in Nghệ-An province. In Alves, Mark, Sidwell, Paul, & Gil, David (eds.), SEALSVIII: Papers from the 8th meeting of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society (1998), 1–9. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar
Bayly, Susan (2000). French anthropology and the Durkheimians in Colonial Indochina. Modern Asian Studies 34(3):581–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boas, Franz (1911). Introduction. In Franz Boas (ed.), The handbook of American Indian languages, 3–83. Washington, DC: Bureau of American Ethnology.Google Scholar
Carruthers, Andrew M. (2017). Grading qualities and (un)settling equivalences: Undocumented migration, commensuration, and intrusive phonosonics in the Indonesia-Malaysia borderlands. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 27(2):124–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelman, Susan A. (2003). The essential child: Origins of essentialism in everyday thought. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graff, Delia (2001). Descriptions as predicates. Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition 102(1):1–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harms, Erik (2011). Saigon's edge: On the margins of Ho Chi Minh City. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harms, Erik (2016). Luxury and rubble: Civility and dispossession in the New Saigon. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haslanger, Sally (2011). Ideology, generics, and common ground. In Witt, Charlotte (ed.), Feminist metaphysics: Explorations in the ontology of sex, gender and the self, 179–208. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hastings, Adi, & Manning, Paul (2004). Acts of alterity. Language & Communication 24(4):291–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hwang, Harry, & Spiegel, Jeffrey H. (2014). The effect of ‘single’ vs. ‘double’ eyelids on the perceived attractiveness of Chinese women. Aesthetic Surgery Journal 34(3):374–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Irvine, Judith T., & Gal, Susan (2000). Language ideology and linguistic differentiation. In Kroskrity, Paul V. (ed.), Regimes of language: Ideologies, polities, and identities, 35–84. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.Google Scholar
Jenks, Peter (2018). Articulated definiteness without articles. Linguistic Inquiry 49(3):501–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kockelman, Paul (2013). Agent, person, subject, self. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Koven, Michele (2016). Essentialization strategies in the storytellings of young Luso-descendant women in France: Narrative calibration, voicing, and scale. Language & Communication 46:19–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leslie, Sarah-Jane (2014). Carving up the social world with generics. In Knobe, Joshua, Lombrozo, Tania, & Nichols, Shaun (eds.), Oxford studies in experimental philosophy, vol. 1, 208–31. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leslie, Sarah-Jane (2017). The original sin of cognition: Fear, prejudice, and generalization. Journal of Philosophy 114(8):393–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Löbel, Elisabeth (2000). Classifiers versus genders and noun classes: A case study in Vietnamese. In Unterbeck, Barbara, Riassanen, Matti, Nevalainen, Terttu, & Saari, Mirja (eds.), Gender in grammar and cognition I: Approaches to gender, 259–319. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lyons, John (1977). Semantics I. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McIntosh, Janet (2005). Language essentialism and social hierarchies among Giriama and Swahili. Journal of Pragmatics 37:1919–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendoza-Denton, Norma (2020). ‘Ask the gays’: How to use language to fragment and redefine the public sphere. In McIntosh, Janet & Mendoza-Denton, Norma (eds.), Language in the Trump era: Scandals and emergencies, 47–51. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peirce, Charles Sanders (1895/1998). Of reasoning in general [MS 595]. In Peirce Edition Project (ed.), Essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writings, vol. 2: 1893–1913. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Reyes, Angela (2017). Ontology of fake: Discerning the Philippine elite. Signs and Society 5(S1):100–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosa, Jonathan, & Diaz, Vanessa (2020). Raciontologies: Rethinking anthropological accounts of institutional racism and enactments of white supremacy in the United States. American Anthropologist 122(1):120–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, Bertrand (1905). On denoting. Mind 14(56):479–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tannen, Deborah (1996). The sex-class linked framing of talk at work. In Tannen, Deborah, Gender and discourse, 195–221. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Keith W. (1998). Surface orientations in Vietnam: Beyond histories of nation and region. The Journal of Asian Studies 57(4):949–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winichakul, Thongchai (2000). The others within: Travels and ethno-spatial differentiation of Siamese subjects, 1885–1910. In Turton, Andrew (ed.), Civility and savagery: Social identity in Tai states, 38–62. London: Curzon.Google Scholar
Trinh, Tue (2011). Nominal reference in two classifier languages. In Reich, Ingo (ed.), Sinn und Bedeutung 15, 629–44. Saarbrücken: Saarland University Press.Google Scholar
Wodak, Daniel, & Leslie, Sarah-Jane (2017). The mark of the plural: Generic generalizations and race. In Taylor, Paul C., Alcoff, Linda Martín, & Anderson, Luvell (eds.), The Routledge companion to the philosophy of race, 277–89. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wynter, Sylvia (1987). On disenchanting discourse: ‘Minority’ literary criticism and beyond. Cultural Critique 7:207–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuckerman, Charles (2018). Good gambling: Meaning and moral economy in late-socialist Laos. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan PhD dissertation.Google Scholar