Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T21:37:12.813Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

When cultural maintenance means linguistic convergence: Pennsylvania German evidence for the Matrix Language Turnover hypothesis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2009

Janet M. Fuller
Janet M. Fuller
Affiliation:
Linguistics Program, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Research on languages in contact has shown evidence of structural convergence, as well as internally motivated language change; one language which has been frequently studied in this light is Pennsylvania German (PG). Myers-Scotton 1993 posits that convergence involves a change in the selection of the language which sets the morpho-syntactic frame involved in language production. This is called a turnover in the Matrix Language (ML). Data from PG collected in the 1940s, as compared with data collected in the late 1970s and 1980s, indicate that an ML turnover is underway in the sectarian communities; the language can be characterized as having a composite ML. The primary features of convergence in these data are English lexical-conceptual structures in the tense system, English morphological realization patterns in verb phrases, and the increased syntactization of word order in PG. There is only weak evidence for the introduction of English system morphemes at this stage. The loss of case-marking does not conform to English patterns; this indicates that much of the influence of language contact occurs at the lexical-conceptual level. (Pennsylvania German, convergence, Matrix Language Frame Model, code-switching, borrowing, language contact)

Type
Articles
Information
Language in Society , Volume 25 , Issue 4 , December 1996 , pp. 493 - 514
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bakker, Peter (1992). “A language of our own”: The genesis of Michif, the mixed Cree-French language of the Canadian Métis. Doctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Bakker, Peter, & Mous, Maarten (1994), eds. Mixed languages: 15 cases of language intertwining. Amsterdam: Institute for Functional Research into Language and Language Use.Google Scholar
Buffington, Albert, & Barba, Preston (1954). A Pennsylvania German grammar. Allentown, PA: Schlechterx0027;s.Google Scholar
Burridge, Kate (1992). Creating grammar: Examples from Pennsylvania German, Ontario. In Burridge, & Enninger, (eds.), 199–241.Google Scholar
Burridge, Kate, & Enninger, Werner (1992), eds. Diachronic studies on the languages of the Anabaptists. Bochum: Brockmeyer.Google Scholar
Costello, John R. (1989). Innovations increasing syntactic complexity in the native language of bilingual children from 5 to 10: The case for Pennsylvania German. Zeitschrift fur Dialektologie und Linguistik 64:3–18.Google Scholar
Enninger, Werner (1979). Language convergence in a stable triglossia plus trilingualism situation. InFreese, Peter et al. (eds.), Anglistik: Beiträge zur Fachwissenschaft und Fachdidaktik, Festschrift für Eleonore Cladder, 43–63. Münster: Regensberg.Google Scholar
Enninger, Werner(1980). Syntactic convergence in a stable triglossia plus trilingualism situation in Kent County, Delaware, U.S. Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik, Beihefte 32:343–50. Wiesbaden: Steiner.Google Scholar
Enninger, Werner, & Wandt, Karl-Heinz (1982). Pennsylvania German in the context of an Old Order Amish Settlement: The structural instability of a functionally stable variety. Yearbook of German-American Studies 17:123–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frey, J. William (1942). A simple grammar of Pennsylvania Dutch. Clinton, SC: Frey.Google Scholar
Fuller, Janet (1994). Variation on the path to convergence: Pennsylvania German and the ML turnover hypothesis. Poster session at NWAV-23, Stanford.Google Scholar
Fuller, Janet (1995). Codeswitching vs. convergence: A Matrix Language Frame model analysis. Paper presented at SECOL, Athens, GA.Google Scholar
Gumperz, John J. (1971). Convergence and creolization: A case from the Indo-Aryan/Dravidian border in India. In his Language in social groups, 251–73. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Huffines, Marion Lois (1988a). Lexical borrowing and linguistic convergence in Pennsylvania German. Yearbook of German-American Studies 23:59–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huffines, Marion Lois (1988b). Building progressives: Evidence from cognate structures. Journal of English Linguistics 21:137–48.Google Scholar
Huffines, Marion Lois (1989). Case usage among the Pennsylvania German sectarians and nonsectarians. In Dorian, Nancy (ed.), Investigating obsolescence: Studies in language contraction and death, 211–26. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huffines, Marion Lois (1990). Contact phenomena in language maintenance and shift: The Pennsylvania German infinitive construction. American Journal of German Linguistics and Literatures 2:95–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huffines, Marion Lois (1991). Pennsylvania German: Convergence and change as strategies of discourse. In Seliger, Herbert W. & Vago, Rober M. (eds.), First language attrition, 125–37. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huffines, Marion Lois (1992). Language change and enabling strategies of Pennsylvania Anabaptists. In Burridge, & Enninger, , 166–81.Google Scholar
Jake, Janice L. (1995). Splitting the lexical structure: A composite model of adult second language acquisition. University of South Carolina, ms.Google Scholar
Jake, Janice L., & Myers-Scotton, Carol (1994). Embedded language islands in code-switching: Variation and compromise at two linguistic levels. Poster session at NWAV-23, Stanford.Google Scholar
Johnson-Weiner, Karen (1989). Keeping Dutch: Linguistic heterogeneity and the maintenance of Pennsylvania German in two Old Order Amish communities. Zeitschrift fur Dialektologie und Linguistik 64:95–104.Google Scholar
Johnson-Weiner, Karen (1992). Group identity and language maintenance: The survival of Pennsylvania German in Old Order communities. In Burridge, & Enninger, , 26–41.Google Scholar
Kloss, Heinz (1985), ed. Deutsche Sprache in Europa und Übersee: Deutsch als Muttersprache in den U.S., Teil II. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
Korda, Helge & Raith, Joachim (1988). Phonetische und phonemische Transkription eines gesprochenen pennsylvaniadeutschen Textes. In Enninger, Werner et al. . (eds.), Internal and external perspectives on Amish and Mennonite Life, 3:125–42. Essen, Germany: Delaware Amish Project Team.Google Scholar
Levine, Glenn S. (1995). Elderly second-generation speakers of Yiddish: Toward a model of LI loss, incomplete LI acquisition, competence and control. Paper presented at the Symposium on Language Loss and Public Policy, University of New Mexico.Google Scholar
Louden, Mark L. (1988). Bilingualism and syntactic change in Pennsylvania German. Doctoral dissertation, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Louden, Mark L. (1992). German as an object-verb language: A unification of generative and typological approaches. In Rauch, Irmengard et al. . (eds.), On Germanic linguistics: Issues and method, 217–31. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Louden, Mark L. (1993). Patterns of sociolinguistic variation in Pennsylvania German. In Salmons, Joseph C. (ed.), The German language in America, 1683–1991, 284–305. Madison, WI: Max Kade Institute for German-American Studies.Google Scholar
Myers-Scotton, Carol (1993). Duelling languages: Grammatical structure in codeswitching. Oxford: Clarendon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers-Scotton, Carol (1996a). “Matrix language recognition” and “morpheme sorting” as possible structural strategies in pidgin/creole formation. In Spears, Arthur & Winford, Donald (eds.), Pidgins and Creoles: Structure and status. Amsterdam: Benjamins, to appear.Google Scholar
Myers-Scotton, Carol (1996b). One way to dusty death: The matrix language turnover hypothesis. In Grenoble, Lenore & Whaley, Lindsay (eds.), Language loss and community response. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press, to appear.Google Scholar
Myers-Scotton, Carol, & Jake, Janice L. (1995). Matching lemmas in a bilingual language production model: Evidence from intrasentential codeswitching. Linguistics 33:981–1024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raith, Joachim (1992). Dialect mixing and/or code convergence: Pennsylvania German? In Burridge, & Enninger, , 152–65.Google Scholar
Reed, Carrol (1948). The adaption of English to Pennsylvania German morphology. American Speech 23:239–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savić, Jelena (1994).Code-switching as a mechanism of structural convergence and languages change. Paper presented at NWAV-23, Stanford.Google Scholar
Savić, Jelena (1995). Structural convergence and language change: Evidence from Serbian/English code-switching. Language in Society 24:475–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaufeli, Anneli (1995). Word order in a Turkish-Dutch contact situation. Paper presented at the Symposium on Language Loss and Public Policy, University of New Mexico.Google Scholar
Silva-Corvalán, Carmen (1994). Language contact and change: Spanish in Los Angeles. Oxford: Clarendon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomason, Sarah, & Kaufman, Terrence (1988). Language contact, creolization, and genetic linguistics. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Ness, Silke (1990). Changes in an obsolescing language: Pennsylvania German in West Virginia. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Wei, Longxing (1994). Organizational principles behind codeswitching and interlanguage development in early second language acquisition. Paper presented at NWAV-23, Stanford.Google Scholar