We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Werner Nothdurft (ed.), Schlichtung, Band 1: Streit schlichten-Gesprächsanalytische Untersuchungen zu institutionellen Formen konsensueller Konfliktregelung [Mediation, vol. 1: Mediating disputes-Conversation-analytic research on institutional forms of consensual resolution of disputes]. (Schriften des Instituts für Deutsche Sprache, 5.) Berlin: de Gruyter, 1995. Pp. viii, 431. Hb DM 206.00.
Published online by Cambridge University Press:
26 July 2012
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
REFERENCES
Candlin, Christopher, & Maley, Yon (1994). Interextuality and interdiscursivity in the discourse of alternative dispute resolution. (Centre for Language and Social Life, Working Papers, no.1.) Sydney: Macquarie University.Google Scholar
Garcia, Angela (1991). Dispute resolution without disputing: How the interactional organization of mediation hearings minimizes argument. American Sociological Review56:818–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maley, You (1995). From adjudication to mediation: Third party discourse in coflict resolution. Journal of Pragmatics23:93–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Calvin (1996). Competing constraints in alternative dispute resolution: The interactional achievement of formality and informality in mediation. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics. 19:2.79–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar