Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T20:48:13.837Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The semiotic constitution of Kamsá ritual language*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

John H. Mcdowell
John H. Mcdowell
Affiliation:
Folklore Department, Indiana University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Recent studies of socially situated ways of speaking have reflected a growing uneasiness with the tidy dichotomies (for example, formal/informal, polite/casual) that have informed sociolinguistic inquiries in the past. The ritual language of the Kamsà indigenous community of Andean Colombia presents a serious challenge to these familiar conceptual molds. In elaborating a semiotic constitution for this speech variety, I articulate a model founded on three interrelated variables – accessibility, formalization, and efficacy – that may prove relevant to the discussion of ritual and ceremonial languages elsewhere. (Ritual and ceremonial languages, South American Indian speech forms, semiotics.)

Type
Articles
Information
Language in Society , Volume 12 , Issue 1 , March 1983 , pp. 23 - 46
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Albó, X. (1970). Social constraints on Cochebamban Quechua. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Austin, J. (1962). How to do things with words. Cambridge, Ma.: Harvard UniversityPress.Google Scholar
Bloch, M. (1974). Symbols, song, dance and features of articulation: Is religion an extreme form of traditional authority? European Journal of Sociology 15: 55–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonilla, V. D. (1972). Servants of God or masters of men: The story of a Capuchin mission in Amazonia. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Ferguson, C. (1964). Diglossia. In Hymes, D. (ed.), Language in culture and society. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Firth, R. (1972). Verbal and bodily ritual of greeting and parting. In Fontaine, J. La (ed.), The interpretation of ritual. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
Foster, M. (1974). When words become deeds: An analysis of three Iroquois longhouse speech events. In Bauman, R. & Sherzer, J. (eds.), Explorations in the ethnography of speaking. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fox, J. (1974). “Our ancestors spoke in pairs”: Rotinese views of language, dialect, and code. In Bauman, R. & Sherzer, J. (eds.), Explorations in the ethnography of speaking. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gossen, G. (1971). Chamula genres of verbal behavior. Journal of American Folklore 84: 145–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gossen, G. (1974). Chamulas in the world of the sun: Time and space in a Maya oral tradition. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Howard, L. (1967). Phonemic systems of Colombian languages. Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Irvine, J. (1979). Formality and informality in communicative events. American Anthropologist 81: 773–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1960). Linguistics and poetics: Closingb statement. In Sebeok, T. (ed.), Style in language. Cambridge, Ma.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Juajibioy, Chindoy A. (1965). Ritos funerarios de los aborigenes Kamsá de Sibundoy. Boletin del instituto de antropologia III: 67–115.Google Scholar
Juajibioy, Chindoy A. & Wheeler, A. (1973). Bosquejo etnolingüístico del grupo Kamsá de Sibundoy Putumayo, Colombia. Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
List, G. (1963). The boundaries of speech and song. Ethnomusicology 7: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loukotka, C. (1968). Classification of South American Indian languages. Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
McDowell, J. (1978). Kamsá ritual drinking. Cuadernos Vicus, Etnología 2: 1–14.Google Scholar
McDowell, J. (1981). Towards a semiotics of nicknaming: The Kamsá example. Journal of American Folklore 94: 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDowell, J. (1982). Beyond iconicity: Ostension in Kamsá mythic narrative. Journal of the Folklore Institute 19: 119–141.Google Scholar
Mintz, S. & Wolf, E. (1950). An analysis of ritual co-parenthood (compadrazgo). Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 6: 341–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, D. (1977). Ritual communication: Some considerations regarding meaning in Navajo ceremonials. In Dolgin, J. et al. (eds.), Symbolic anthropology: A reader in the study of symbols and meanings. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Newman, S. (1964). Vocabulary levels: Zuni sacred and slang usage. In Hymes, D. (ed.), Language in culture and society. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Rubin, J. (1970). Bilingual usage in Paraguay. In Fishman, J. (ed.), Readings in the sociology of language. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Stross, B. (1974). Speaking of speaking: Tenejapa Tzeltal metalinguistics. In Bauman, R. & Sherzer, J. (eds.), Explorations in the ethnography of speaking. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tambiah, S. (1968). The magical power of words. Man 3: 175–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tedlock, D. (1976). From prayer to reprimand. In Samarin, W. (ed.), Language in religious practice. Rowley, Ma.: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Turner, V. (1969). The ritual process: Structure and anti-structure. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar