Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T21:23:48.389Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Replies and responses1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

Erving Goffman
Erving Goffman
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This paper examines conversational dialogue. It is divided into four parts. The first presents arguments for dialogic analysis, the second lists some failings, the third applies this critical view to the notion of a ‘reply’; the final part is an overview.

Type
Articles
Information
Language in Society , Volume 5 , Issue 3 , December 1976 , pp. 257 - 313
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Austin, J. L. (1965). How to do things with words. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bellack, Arno A, et al. (1966). The language of the classroom. New York: Columbia Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, Leonard (1946). Language. New York: Henry Holt & Company.Google Scholar
Boomer, Donald S. (1965). Hesitation and grammatical encoding. Language and Speech 8. 148–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bruner, Jerome (1974). The ontogenesis of speech acts. In Collett, Peter (ed.), Social rules and social behavior. Oxford: Department of Experimental Psychology, Oxford University, multigraph.Google Scholar
Clancy, Patricia (1972). Analysis of a conversation. Anthropological Linguistics 14. 78–86.Google Scholar
Crystal, David (1969). The language of conversation. In Crystal, David & Davy, Derek (eds.) Investigating English style. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. 95–124.Google Scholar
Dittmann, Allen T. (1972). The body movement—speech rhythm relationship as a cue to speech encoding. In Siegman, A. W. & Pope, B. (eds.), Studies in dyadic communication. New York: Pergamon Press. 135–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, Starkey Jr (1972). Some signals and rules for taking speaking turns in conversations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 23. 283–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ekman, Paul & Friesen, Wallace (1969). The repertoire of nonverbal behavior: Categories, origins, usage and coding. Semiotica 1. 63–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ervin-Tripp, Susan (1976). Is Sybil there? The structure of American directives. LinS 5. 25–66.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J. (1973). “May we come in?” Semiotica 9. 97–116.Google Scholar
Gluckman, Max (1962). Les rites de passage. In Gluckman, Max (ed.) Essays on the ritual of social relations Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving (1961). Encounters. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, Inc.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving (1967). Interaction ritual. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving (1972). Relations in public. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving (1974). Frame analysis. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Charles (forthcoming). Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Marjorie (forthcoming). Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Goodwin, Marjorie (1975). Aspects of the social organization of children's arguments: Some procedures and resources for restructuring positions. Unpublished paper.Google Scholar
Gordon, David & Lakoff, George (1971). Conversational postulates. In Papers of Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago: Department of Linguistics, University of Chicago. 63–84.Google Scholar
Grice, H. P. (1967) Logic and conversation. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Gumperz, John J. (forthcoming). Language, communication and public negotiation. Sanday, Peggy R. (ed), Anthropology and the public interest: Fieldwork and theory. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gunter, Richard (1974). Sentences in dialog. Columbia, S.C.: Hornbeam Press.Google Scholar
Harris, Zellig (1951). Structural linguistics. Chicago: University of Chicago Phoenix Books.Google Scholar
Hymes, Virginia (1974). The ethnography of linguistic intuitions at Warm Springs. Paper presented at NWAVE III, Georgetown University, 10 25, 1974.Google Scholar
Jefferson, Gail (1972). Side sequences. In Sudnow, David (ed.), Studies in social interaction, New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William & Fanshel, David (in press). Therapeutic discourse: Psychotherapy as conversation.Google Scholar
Merritt, Marilyn (1976). Resources for saying in service encounters. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Linguistics, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Pomerantz, Anita May (1975). Second assessments: A study of some features of agreements/disagreements. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Irvine.Google Scholar
Philips, Susan U. (1974). The invisible culture: Communication in classroom and community on the Warm Springs Reservation. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Quine, Willard Van (1962). Mathematical logic, rev. ed. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Rommetveit, Ragnar (1974). On message structure: A framework for the study of language and communication. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey (1967). Lecture notes. University of California, Irvine. Unpublished.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey (1973). Lecture notes. Summer Institute of Linguistics. Ann Arbor, Michigan.Google Scholar
Sacks, Harvey, Schegloff, Emanuel & Jefferson, Gail (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50. 696–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel (1968). Sequencing in conversational openings. American Anthropologist 70. 1075–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel & Sacks, Harvey (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica 8. 289–.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, John R. (1976). A classification of illocutionary acts. LinS 5. 1–23.Google Scholar
Searle, John R. (n.d.). Indirect speech acts. Unpublished paper.Google Scholar
Shatz, Marilyn (1974). The comprehension of indirect directives: Can two-year-olds shut the door? Paper presented at the Summer Meetings, Linguistic Society of America, Amherst, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Shuy, Roger (1974). Problems of communication in the cross-cultural medical interview. Working Papers in Sociolinguistics, No. 19, 12, 1974.Google Scholar
Sinclair, J. McH. & Coulthard, R. M. (1975) Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sinclair, J. McH. et al. (1972). The English used by teachers and pupils. Unpublished Final Report to SSRC for the period 09 1970 to 08 1972.Google Scholar
Stubbs, Michael (1973). Some structural complexities of talk in meetings. Working Papers in Discourse Analysis, No. 5. University of Birmingham: English Language Research.Google Scholar
Vološinov, V. N. (1973). Marxism and the philosophy of language. New York: Seminar Press.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yngve, Victor H. (1970). On getting a word in edgewise. In Campbell, M. A. et al. (eds.), Papers from the Sixth Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago: Department of Linguistics, University of Chicago. 567–78.Google Scholar