Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T21:30:07.531Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Maurice Nevile, Beyond the black box: Talk-in-interaction in the airline cockpit

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 May 2007

Lorena M. A. de-Matteis
Lorena M. A. de-Matteis
Affiliation:
Humanities, Universidad Nacional del Sur, Bahía Blanca – CP8000 Argentina, [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Maurice Nevile, Beyond the black box: Talk-in-interaction in the airline cockpit. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2004. Pp. xvii, 245. Hb $94.95.

Maurice Nevile, from the Australian National University, examines the routine interaction between pilots in the airline cockpit, drawing on several related theoretical approaches to talk-in-interaction, such as ethnomethodology, conversation analysis, and institutional discourse analysis. In chapter 1, “The workplace as social interaction,” Nevile reviews the theoretical background on workplace and institutional discourse as well as some of the most significant articles in the literature about aviation communications, in particular about interaction in the airline cockpit. In this sense, Nevile's work establishes a different orientation since, as he points out, previous work on this type of institutional discourse has focused on critical situations, accidents, and incidents instead of routine interaction, with the result that

Type
BOOK REVIEWS
Information
Language in Society , Volume 36 , Issue 3 , July 2007 , pp. 440 - 445
Copyright
© 2007 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Cushing, Steven (1994). Fatal words: Communication clashes and aircraft crashes. Chicago: University of Chicago.
de-Matteis, Lorena (2004a). Convergencias y divergencias en radiotelefonía. El caso de la aeronáutica y la radioafición. In Mariela Rígano & Lorena de-Matteis (coords.), Actas de las I Jornadas de Jóvenes Investigadores en Ciencias Humanas, 283–97. Bahía Blanca: Jóvenes Investigadores de la Fundación Ezequiel Martinez Estrada.
de-Matteis, Lorena (2004b). Política y planificación lingüísticas en la aviación en Argentina. Revista de lingüística teórica y aplicada 42(2):9–44.Google Scholar
Endsley, M. R. (1988). Design and evaluation for situation awareness enhancement. Proceedings of the Human Factors 32nd Annual Meeting, 97–101.CrossRef
Goguen, Joseph, & Linde, Charlotte (1983). A linguistic methodology for the analysis of aviation accidents. Washington, DC: NASA Contractor Report 3741.
Helmreich, Robert; Merritt, Ashleigh; & Wilhelm, John (1999). The evolution of Crew Resource Management training in commercial aviation. International Journal of Aviation Psychology 9(1):19–32.Google Scholar
Kanki, Barbara (1996). A training perspective: Enhancing team performance through effective communication. In Barbara Kanki & Veronika Prinzo (eds.), Methods and metrics of voice communications, 39–42. Washington, DC: Office of Aviation Medicine.
Linde, Charlotte (1988). The quantitative study of communicative success: Politeness and accidents in aviation discourse. Language in Society 17:375–99.Google Scholar
Nagel, David, & Wiener, Earl (eds.) (1988). Human factors in aviation. London: Academic Press.
Varantola, Krista (1989). Natural language vs. purpose-built languages. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 90(2):173–83.Google Scholar
Woerth, Duane (2000). Issues arising out of the crash of Egypt Air 990. Statement before the Subcommittee on Aviation, Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, U.S. House of Representatives, April 11, 2000. www.resourcescommittee.house.gov/transportation/aviation/hearing/04-11-00/woerth.html. (Retrieved October 15, 2005.)