Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T21:07:26.832Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Linguistic prescription, ideological structure, and the actuation of linguistic changes: Grammatical gender in French parliamentary debates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2018

Heather Burnett Open the ORCID record for Heather Burnett [Opens in a new window]  and
Olivier Bonami
Heather Burnett*
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Linguistique Formelle
Olivier Bonami
Affiliation:
CNRS – Université Paris-Diderot
*
Address for correspondence: Heather Burnett Laboratoire de Linguistique FormelleUniversité Paris-DiderotCase 7031-5, rue Thomas Mann 75205 Paris Cedex 13, France[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We present a quantitative study of the linguistic and social factors conditioning the use of grammatical gender with reference to women, focusing on variation in the debates of the French parliament. Two prime ministers of similar political leanings regulated the use of feminine g-gender through identical policies in 1986 and 1998, with no effect on parliamentary speech in the first instance, and dramatic success in the second. We claim that the latter outcome resulted from changes in gender ideologies between these two dates. The 1990s saw the emergence of a new social type for female politicians, which only feminine g-gender can construct. We hypothesize that the 1998 policy was effective because it strengthened existing associations between feminine g-gender and a persona, while the original policy tried to build on ideological structure that was not widespread. We conclude that linguistic prescriptions are only successful if they build on existing ideologies. (Linguistic prescription, gender ideology, grammatical gender, ideological structure)*

Type
Articles
Information
Language in Society , Volume 48 , Issue 1 , February 2019 , pp. 65 - 93
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This research was conducted at the Laboratoire de linguistique formelle (UMR7110 – Université Paris Diderot & CNRS). We wish to thank Quentin David, Yiming Liang, and Antoine Hédier for their work on data extraction, verification, and annotation, as well as Catherine Joly, Director of the Service des comptes rendus at the Assemblée nationale, for taking the time out of her busy schedule to personally explain to us in detail how the transcripts were constructed. Preliminary versions of this work were presented at NWAV 46 and at various events at ENS Paris, Ohio State University, Stanford University, Université Paris Diderot, and ZAS Berlin. We thank the audience at these events for useful comments, suggestions, and debate. For comments on previous versions of this text or other crucial advice we wish to thank Penny Eckert, Michael Friesner, Anne F. Garréta, Erez Levon, Denis Paperno, Célia Richy, and Sali A. Tagliamonte. We are grateful to Jenny Cheshire and our two reviewers for helping us find the appropriate focus for this work and providing crucial references and insights. This work was partially supported by a public grant overseen by the French National Research Agency (ANR) as part of the ‘Investissements d'Avenir’ program (reference: ANR-10-LABX-0083).

References

REFERENCES

Abbou, Julie (2011a). L'antisexisme linguistique dans les brochures libertaires: Pratiques d’écriture et métadiscours. Aix en Provence: Université de Provence-Aix-Marseille I dissertation.Google Scholar
Abbou, Julie (2011b). Double gender marking in French: A linguistic practice of antisexism. Current Issues in Language Planning 12(1):55–75.Google Scholar
Académie française (1984). Féminisation des titres et des fonctions. Déclaration de l'Académie française, June 14. Online: http://www.academie-francaise.fr/actualites/feminisation-des-titres-et-des-fonctions.Google Scholar
Académie française (2014). La féminisation des noms de métiers, fonctions, grades ou titres: Mise au point de l'Académie française. Déclaration de l'Académie française, October 10. Online: http://www.academie-francaise.fr/actualites/la-feminisation-des-noms-de-metiers-fonctions-grades-ou-titres-mise-au-point-de-lacademie.Google Scholar
Achin, Catherine (ed.) (2007). Sexes, genre et politique. Paris: Economica.Google Scholar
Agacinski, Sylviane (1998). Politique des sexes. Paris: Le Seuil.Google Scholar
Agacinski, Sylviane (1999). Contre l'effacement des sexes. Le Monde, February 6.Google Scholar
Anscombre, Jean-Claude (1995). La théorie des topoï: Sémantique ou rhétorique? Hermès 1:185–98.Google Scholar
Anscombre, Jean-Claude, & Ducrot, Oswald (1983). L'argumentation dans la langue. Paris: Mardaga.Google Scholar
Bachelot, Roselyne, & Fraisse, Gisèle (1999). Deux femmes au royaume des hommes. Paris: Hachette Littératures.Google Scholar
Badinter, Elizabeth (1996). Non aux quotas des femmes. Le Monde, June 12.Google Scholar
Badinter, Elizabeth (1999). La parité est une régression. L’événement Du Jeudi, February 4.Google Scholar
Badinter, Elizabeth (2003). Fausse route. Paris: Odile Jacob.Google Scholar
Bard, Christine (2012). Performances de genre: Images croisées de Michèle Alliot-Marie et de Roselyne Bachelot. Histoire@Politique 2:69–86.Google Scholar
Bates, Douglas; Maechler, Martin; Bolker, Ben; & Walker, Steve (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67(1):1–48.Google Scholar
Becquer, Annie; Cerquiglini, Bernard; Cholewka, Nicole; Coutier, Martine; Frécher, Josette; & Mathieu, Marie-Josèphe (1999). Femme, j’écris ton nom: Guide d'aide à la féminisation des noms de métiers, titres, grades et fonctions. Paris: Institut National de La Langue Française.Google Scholar
Bereni, Laure (2007). De la cause à la loi: Les mobilisations pour la parité politique en France (1992–2000). Paris: Université Panthéon-Sorbonne-Paris I dissertation.Google Scholar
Bonami, Olivier, & Boyé, Gilles (2019). Paradigm uniformity and the French gender system. In Baerman, Matthew, Bond, Oliver, & Hippisley, Andrew (eds.), Perspectives on morphology. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, to appear.Google Scholar
Boroditsky, Lera; Schmidt, Lauren A.; & Phillips, Webb (2003). Sex, syntax, and semantics. In Gentner, Dedre & Goldin-Meadow, Susan (eds.), Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought, 61–79. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bouchardeau, Huguette (1988). Choses dites de profil. Paris: Ramsay.Google Scholar
Brauer, Markus, & Landry, Mikael (2008). Un ministre peut-il tomber enceinte? L'impact du générique masculin sur les représentations mentales. L'Année Psychologique 108(2):243–72.Google Scholar
Bredin, Frédérique (1997). Députée: Journal de bord. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
Brick, Noelle, & Wilks, Clarissa (1994). Et Dieu nomma la femme: Observations sur la question de la féminisation des noms d'agent et sur les désignations d’Édith Cresson dans la presse. Journal of French Language Studies 4(2):235–39.Google Scholar
Burnett, Heather (2017). Sociolinguistic interaction and identity construction: The view from game-theoretic pragmatics. Journal of Sociolinguistics 22:238–71.Google Scholar
Burnett, Heather, & Bonami, Olivier (2019). A conceptual spaces model of socially motivated language change. Proceedings of the second meeting of the Society for Computation in Linguistics, to appear.Google Scholar
Burr, Elisabeth (2003). Gender and language politics in France. In Hellinger, Marlis & Bußmann, Hadumod (eds.), Gender across languages: The linguistic representation of women and men, vol. 3, 119–39. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith (1993). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of sex. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith (1997). Excitable speech: A politics of the performative. London: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Campbell-Kibler, Kathryn (2007). Accent, (ING), and the social logic of listener perceptions. American Speech 82(1):32–64.Google Scholar
Chatard, Armand; Guimont, Serge; & Martinot, Delphine (2005). Impact de la féminisation lexicale des professions sur l'auto-efficacité des élèves: Une remise en cause de l'universalisme masculine? L'année Psychologique 105(2):249–72.Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville G. (1991). Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Culbertson, Jennifer; Gagliardi, Annie; & Smith, Kenny (2017). Competition between phonological and semantic cues in noun class learning. Journal of Memory and Language 92:343–58.Google Scholar
Dahl, Osten (2000). Animacy and the notion of semantic gender. In Unterbeck, Barbara, Rissanen, Matti, Nevalainen, Terttu, & Saari, Mirja (eds.), Gender in grammar and cognition, vol. I, 99–116. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Donnellan, Keith S. (1966). Reference and definite descriptions. The Philosophical Review 75(3):281–304.Google Scholar
Douven, Igor; Decock, Lieven; Dietz, Richard; & Égré, Paul (2014). Vagueness: A conceptual spaces approach. Journal of Philosophical Logic 42(1):137–60.Google Scholar
Dye, Melody; Milin, Petar; Futrell, Richard; & Ramscar, Michael (2017). A functional theory of gender paradigms. In Kiefer, Ferenc, Blevins, James P., & Bartos, Huba (eds.), Perspectives on morphological organization: Data and analyses, 212–39. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Eckert, Penelope (2008). Variation and the indexical field. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12(4):453–76.Google Scholar
Ehrlich, Susan, & King, Ruth (1992). Gender-based language reform and the social construction of meaning. Discourse & Society 3(2):151–66.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel (1976). Histoire de la sexualité, tome 1: La volonté de savoir. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Freedman, Jane (1997). Femmes politiques: Mythes et symboles. Paris: L'Harmattan.Google Scholar
Freedman, Jane (1998). Les hasards d’être femme en politique. Modern & Contemporary France 6(3):371–73.Google Scholar
Fujimura, Itsuko (2005). La féminisation des noms de métiers et des titres dans la presse française (1998–2001). Mots 78:37–52.Google Scholar
Gärdenfors, Peter (2000). Conceptual spaces: The geometry of thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.Google Scholar
Gärdenfors, Peter (2014). The geometry of meaning: Semantics based on conceptual spaces. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Garréta, Anne F. (2001). Re-enchanting the republic: ‘Pacs’, ‘parité’ and ‘le symbolique’. Yale French Studies 100:145–66.Google Scholar
Gaspard, Françoise; Servan-Schreiber, Claude; & Le Gall, Anne (1992). Au pouvoir citoyennes! Liberté, Égalité, Parité. Paris: Le Seuil.Google Scholar
Grice, Paul (1975). Logic and conversation. In Davidson, Donald & Harman, Gilbert H. (eds.), The logic of grammar, 64–75. Ensino, CA: Dickenson.Google Scholar
Guaresi, Magali (2018). Parler au féminin: Les profession de foi des député.e.s sous la Cinquième République (1958–2007). Paris: L'Harmattan.Google Scholar
Guigou, Elisabeth (1997). Être femme en politique. Paris: Plon.Google Scholar
Gygax, Pascal; Gabriel, Ute; Lévy, Arik; Pool, Eva; Grivel, Marjorie; & Pedrazzini, Elena (2012). The masculine form and its competing interpretations in French: When linking grammatically masculine role names to female referents is difficult. Journal of Cognitive Psychology 24(4):395–408.Google Scholar
Gygax, Pascal; Gabriel, Ute; Lévy, Arik; Pool, Eva; Grivel, Marjorie; Pedrazzini, Elena; Sarrasin, Oriane; Oakhill, Jane; & Garnham, Alan (2008). Generically intended, but specifically interpreted: When beauticians, musicians, and mechanics are all men. Language and Cognitive Processes 23(3):464–85.Google Scholar
Gygax, Pascal; Gabriel, Ute; Lévy, Arik; Pool, Eva; Grivel, Marjorie; & Pedrazzini, Elena; Sarrasin, Orianne; Lévy, Arik; Sato;, Sayaka & Gabriel, Ute (2013). La représentation mentale du genre pendant la lecture: État actuel de la recherche et directions futures. Journal of French Language Studies 23:243–57.Google Scholar
Halimi, Gisèle (1997). La nouvelle cause des femmes. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Hampton, James A. (1998). Similarity-based categorization and fuzziness of natural categories. Cognition 65(2–3):137–65.Google Scholar
Hampton, James A. (2007). Typicality, graded membership, and vagueness. Cognitive Science 31(3):355–84.Google Scholar
Hockett, Charles (1958). A course in modern linguistics. New York: McMillan.Google Scholar
Holmes, Virginia M., & Segui, Juan (2004). Sublexical and lexical influences on gender assignment in French. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 33(6):425–57.Google Scholar
Holmes, Virginia M., & Segui, Juan (2006). Assigning grammatical gender during word production. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 35(1):5–30.Google Scholar
Houdebine, Anne-Marie (1987). Le français au féminin. La Linguistique 23(1):13–34.Google Scholar
Houdebine-Gravaud, Anne-Marie (1998). La féminisation des noms de métiers. Paris: L'Harmattan.Google Scholar
Irmen, Lisa, & Schumann, Eva (2011). Processing grammatical gender of role nouns: Further evidence from eye movements. Journal of Cognitive Psychology 23(8):998–1014.Google Scholar
Irvine, Judith, & Gal, Susan (2000). Language ideology and linguistic differentiation. In Kroskrity, Paul V. (ed.), Regimes of language: Ideologies, polities, and identities, 35–84. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research Press.Google Scholar
Julliard, Virginie (2012). De la presse à Internet: La parité en questions. Paris: Hermès.Google Scholar
Kamp, Hans, & Partee, Barbara (1995). Prototype theory and compositionality. Cognition 57(2):129–91.Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia (1999). Le sens de la parité. L'Infini 67:47–54.Google Scholar
Lepage, Corinne (1998). On ne peut rien faire, Madame le ministre… Paris: Albin Michel.Google Scholar
Levon, Erez (2014). Categories, stereotypes, and the linguistic perception of sexuality. Language in Society 43(5):539–66.Google Scholar
Livia, Anna, & Hall, Kira (1997). ‘It's a girl!’: Bringing performativity back to linguistics. In Livia, Anna & Hall, Kira (eds.), Queerly phrased: Language, gender, and sexuality, 3–18. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Matthews, Clive (2010). On the nature of phonological cues in the acquisition of French gender categories: Evidence from instance-based learning models. Lingua 120(4):879–900.Google Scholar
McConnell-Ginet, Sally (2013). Gender and its relation to sex: The myth of natural gender. In Corbett, Greville G. (ed.), The expression of gender, 3–38. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Michard, Claire (1996). Genre et sexe en linguistique: Les analyses du masculin générique. Mots 49(1):29–47.Google Scholar
Michard, Claire (1999). Humain/femelle: Deux poids deux mesures dans la catégorisation de sexe en français. Nouvelles questions féministes 20(1):53–95.Google Scholar
Michel, Lucy (2016). La relation entre genre grammatical et dénomination de la personne en langue française: Approches sémantiques. Dijon: Université de Bourgogne dissertation.Google Scholar
Montague, Richard (1970). Universal grammar. Theoria 36(3):373–98.Google Scholar
Montini, Frédérique (2017). Le Genre Présidentiel. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar
Ochs, Elinor (1992). Indexing gender. In Duranti, Alessandro & Goodwin, Charles (eds.), Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon, 335–58. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pauwels, Anne (1998). Women changing language. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Pauwels, Anne (1999). Feminist language planning: Has it been worthwhile? Linguistik Online 2(1). Online: https://bop.unibe.ch/linguistik-online/article/view/1043/1707.Google Scholar
Podesva, Robert J. (2007). Phonation type as a stylistic variable: The use of falsetto in constructing a persona. Journal of Sociolinguistics 11(4):478–504.Google Scholar
Podesva, Robert J.; Reynolds, Jermay; Callier;, Patrick & Baptiste, Jessica (2015). Constraints on the social meaning of Released/T: A production and perception study of US politicians. Language Variation and Change 27(1):59–87.Google Scholar
Ramsay, Raylene L. (2003). French women in politics: Writing power, paternal legitimization, and maternal legacies. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Rosch, Elenor (1975). Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 104(3):192–233.Google Scholar
Roudy, Yvette (1995). Mais de quoi ont-ils peur? Un vent de misogynie souffle sur la politique. Paris: Albin Michel.Google Scholar
Royal, Ségolène (1996). La vérité d'une femme. Paris: Stock.Google Scholar
Sato, Sayaka; Gygax, Pascal M.; & Gabriel, Ute (2013). Gender inferences: Grammatical features and their impact on the representation of gender in bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 16(4):792–807.Google Scholar
Scott, Joan Wallach (2005). Parité! Sexual equality and the crisis of French universalism. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Servan-Schreiber, Claude, & Gaspard, Françoise (1993). De la fraternité à la parité. Le Monde, February 19.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael (1976). Shifters, linguistic categories, and cultural description. Meaning in Anthropology 1:1–55.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael (1979). Language structure and linguistic ideology. In Clyne, Paul R., Hanks, William F., & Hofbauer, Carol L. (eds.), The elements: A parasession on linguistic units and levels, 193–247. Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Silverstein, Michael (2003). Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language & Communication 23(3):193–229.Google Scholar
Sintomer, Yves (2007). Le paysage idéologique de la parité. Travail, Genre et Sociétés 2:147–52.Google Scholar
Tarski, Alfred (1944). The semantic conception of truth and the foundations of semantics. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 4(3):341–76.Google Scholar
Tucker, G. Richard; Lambert, Wallace E.; & Rigault, André (1977). The French speaker's skill with grammatical gender: An example of rule-governed behavior. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Viennot, Éliane (1993). Un contentieux à liquider. Le Monde, November 19.Google Scholar
Viennot, Éliane (2014). Non, le masculin ne l'emporte pas sur le féminin! Donnemarie-Dontilly: Éditions Ixe.Google Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel; Labov, William; & Herzog, Marvin I. (1968). Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. In Lehman, Winfred P. & Malkiel, Yakov (eds.), Directions for historical linguistics, 95–195. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Zhang, Qing (2005). A Chinese yuppie in Beijing: Phonological variation and the construction of a new professional identity. Language in Society 34(3):431–66.Google Scholar