Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T03:24:58.744Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Generics in society

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 August 2021

Susan A. Gelman Open the ORCID record for Susan A. Gelman [Opens in a new window]
Susan A. Gelman*
Affiliation:
University of Michigan, USA
*
Address for correspondence: Susan A. Gelman, Department of Psychology, University of Michigan, 530 Church Street, Ann Arbor, MI48109-1043, USA[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article examines two interrelated issues: (i) how considering generics within their social contexts of use contributes to theories of generics, and (ii) how contemporary work on generics provides promising directions for the study of language as an aspect of social life. Examining the function of generics in meaningful interactions stands in contrast to standard treatments, which consider generics as isolated, context-free propositions. Additionally, recent psychological approaches suggest new questions that can enrich sociolinguistic and linguistic anthropological research. These include, for example, when and why generics serve not just negative functions (such as stereotyping) but also positive functions (such as meaning-making), how generics gain their power from what is unstated as opposed to stated, and how generic language distorts academic writing. Ultimately, the study of language in society has the potential to enrich the study of generics beyond what has been learned from their study in linguistics, philosophy, and psychology. (Generics, concepts, categories, stereotyping, induction)*

Type
Articles
Information
Language in Society , Volume 50 , Special Issue 4: The Generic , September 2021 , pp. 517 - 532
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

I thank Chip Zuckerman for feedback on an earlier draft of this article, and the John Templeton Foundation for financial support.

References

REFERENCES

Boucher, Olivier; Chouinard-Leclaire, Christine; Muckle, Gina; Westerlund, Alissa; Burden, Matthew J.; Jacobson, Sandra W.; & Jacobson, Joseph L. (2016). An ERP study of recognition memory for concrete and abstract pictures in school-aged children. International Journal of Psychophysiology 106:106–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brandone, Amanda C.; Cimpian, Andrei; Leslie, Sarah-Jane; & Gelman, Susan A. (2012). Do lions have manes? For children, generics are about kinds rather than quantities. Child Development 83(2):423–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carlson, Gregory N., & Pelletier, Francis J. (eds.) (1995). The generic book. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chestnut, Eleanor K., & Markman, Ellen M. (2018). ‘Girls are as good as boys at math’ implies that boys are probably better: A study of expressions of gender equality. Cognitive Science 42(7):2229–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cimpian, Andrei; Gelman, Susan A.; & Brandone, Amanda C. (2010). Theory-based considerations influence the interpretation of generic sentences. Language and Cognitive Processes 25(2):261–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cimpian, Andrei; Gelman, Susan A.; & Brandone, Amanda C., & Markman, Ellen M. (2009). Information learned from generic language becomes central to children's biological concepts: Evidence from their open-ended explanations. Cognition 113(1):14–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, Ariel (2004). Generics and mental representations. Linguistics and Philosophy 27(5):529–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Creissels, Denis (2013). The generic use of the second person singular pronoun in Mandinka. In Bakker, Dik & Haspelmath, Martin (eds.), Languages across boundaries: Studies in memory of Anna Siewierska, 53–67. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Dahl, Osten (1975). On generics. In Keenan, Edward L. (ed.), Formal semantics of natural language, 99–111. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Hoop, Helen, & Tarenskeen, Sammie (2015). It's all about you in Dutch. Journal of Pragmatics 88:163–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeJesus, Jasmine M.; Callanan, Maureen A.; Solis, Graciela; & Gelman, Susan A. (2019). Generic language in scientific communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116(37):18370–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gelman, Susan A. (2003). The essential child: Origins of essentialism in everyday thought. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelman, Susan A. (2004). Learning words for kinds: Generic noun phrases in acquisition. In Geoffrey Hall, D. & Waxman, Sandra R. (eds.), Weaving a lexicon, 445–84. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Gelman, Susan A. (2010). Generics as a window onto young children's concepts. In Pelletier, Francis Jeffry (ed.), Kinds, things, and stuff: The cognitive side of generics and mass terms. (New directions in cognitive science 12.) New York: Oxford University Press. Online: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195382891.003.0006.Google Scholar
Gelman, Susan A., & Bloom, Paul (2007). Developmental changes in the understanding of generics. Cognition 105(1):166–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gelman, Susan A., & Brandone, Amanda C. (2010). Fast-mapping placeholders: Using words to talk about kinds. Language Learning and Development 6(3):223–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gelman, Susan A.; Coley, John D.; Rosengren, Karl; Hartman, Erin; & Pappas, Athina (1998). Beyond labeling: The role of maternal input in the acquisition of richly-structured categories. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 63(1). Online: https://doi.org/10.2307/1166211.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gelman, Susan A.; Goetz, Peggy J.; Sarnecka;, Barbara S. & Flukes, Jonathan (2008). Generic language in parent-child conversations. Language Learning and Development 4(1):1–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gelman, Susan A.; Leslie, Sarah-Jane; Gelman;, Rochel & Leslie, Alan (2019). Do children recall numbers as generic? A strong test of the generics-as-default hypothesis. Language Learning and Development 15(3):217–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelman, Susan A., & Meyer, Meredith (2014). Generics. In Brooks, Patricia J. & Kempe, Vera (eds.), Encyclopedia of language development, 235–36. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
Gelman, Susan A., & Roberts, Steven O. (2017). How language shapes the cultural inheritance of categories. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114:7900–7907.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gelman, Susan A., & Tardif, Twila Z. (1998). A cross-linguistic comparison of generic noun phrases in English and Mandarin. Cognition 66(3):215–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gelman, Susan A.; Taylor, Marianne G.; & Nguyen, Simone (2004). Mother-child conversations about gender: Understanding the acquisition of essentialist beliefs. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 69(1). Online: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5834.2004.06901002.x.Google Scholar
Gelman, Susan A.; Ware;, Elizabeth & Kleinberg, Felicia (2010). Effects of generic language on category content and structure. Cognitive Psychology 61(3):273–301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodman, Nelson (1973). Fact, fiction, and forecast. 3rd edn. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Graham, Susan A.; Gelman;, Susan A. & Clarke, Jessica (2016). Generics license 30-month-olds’ inferences about the atypical properties of novel kinds. Developmental Psychology 52(9):1353–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hammond, Matthew D., & Cimpian, Andrei (2017). Investigating the cognitive structure of stereotypes: Generic beliefs about groups predict social judgments better than statistical beliefs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 146(5):607–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hollander, Michelle A.; Gelman;, Susan A. & Raman, Lakshmi (2009). Generic language and judgments about category membership: Can generics highlight properties as central? Language and Cognitive Processes 24(4):481–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inhelder, Barbel, & Piaget, Jean (1964). The early growth of logic in the child. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Kitagawa, Chisato, & Lehrer, Adrienne (1990). Impersonal uses of personal pronouns. Journal of Pragmatics 14(5):739–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koven, Michele (2016). Essentialization strategies in the storytellings of young Luso-descendant women in France: Narrative calibration, voicing, and scale. Language & Communication 46:19–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawler, John M. (1973). Tracking the generic toad. Papers from the Ninth regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 320–31. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Leslie, Sarah-Jane (2007). Generics and the structure of the mind. Philosophical Perspectives 21(1):375–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leslie, Sarah-Jane (2008). Generics: Cognition and acquisition. Philosophical Review 117(1):1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mannheim, Bruce; Gelman, Susan A.; Escalante, Carmen; Huayhua, Margarita; & Puma, Rosalia (2011). A developmental analysis of generic nouns in Southern Peruvian Quechua. Language Learning and Development 7(1):1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margetts, Anna (2015). Person shift at narrative peak. Language 91(4):755–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medin, Douglas L., & Ortony, Andrew (1989). Psychological essentialism. In Vosniadou, Stella & Ortony, Andrew (eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning, 179–95. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orvell, Ariana; Kross, Ethan; & Gelman, Susan A. (2017). How ‘you’ makes meaning. Science 355(6331):1299–1302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Orvell, Ariana; Kross, Ethan; & Gelman, Susan A. (2019). Lessons learned: Young children's use of generic-you to make meaning from negative experiences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 148(1):184–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Orvell, Ariana; Kross, Ethan; & Gelman, Susan A. (2020). ‘You’ speaks to me: Effects of generic-you in creating resonance between people and ideas. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 117(49):31038–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pappas, Athina, & Gelman, Susan A. (1998). Generic noun phrases in mother-child conversations. Journal of Child Language 25(1):19–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prasada, Sandeep (2000). Acquiring generic knowledge. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4:66–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prasada, Sandeep, & Dillingham, Elaine M. (2006). Principled and statistical connections in common sense conception. Cognition 99(1):73–112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prasada, Sandeep, & Dillingham, Elaine M. (2009). Representation of principled connections: A window onto the formal aspect of common sense conception. Cognitive Science 33(3):401–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Putnam, Hilary (1975). The meaning of ‘meaning’. In Putnam, Hilary, Mind, language, and reality, 215–71. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quine, Willard V. (1960). Word and object. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Rhodes, Marjorie; Leslie, Sarah-Jane; & Tworek, Christina M. (2012). Cultural transmission of social essentialism. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109(34):13526–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rhodes, Marjorie; Leslie, Sarah-Jane; Bianchi, Lydia; & Chalik, Lisa (2018). The role of generic language in the early development of social categorization. Child Development 89(1):148–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rothbart, Myron, & Taylor, Marjorie (1990). Category labels and social reality: Do we view social categories as natural kinds? In Semin, Gün & Fiedler, Klaus (eds.), Language and social cognition, 11–36. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
Sloutsky, Vladimir M.; Kloos;, Heidi & Fisher, Anna V. (2007). When looks are everything: Appearance similarity versus kind information in early induction. Psychological Science 18(2):179–85.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stirling, Lesley, & Manderson, Lenore (2011). About you: Empathy, objectivity and authority. Journal of Pragmatics 43(6):1581–1602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tessler, Michael Henry, & Goodman, Noah D. (2019). The language of generalization. Psychological Review 126(3):395–436.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wodak, Daniel; Leslie, Sarah-Jane; & Rhodes, Marjorie (2015). What a loaded generalization: Generics and social cognition. Philosophical Compass 10:625–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar