Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T21:22:44.233Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Center for Applied Linguistics, Sociolinguistics: a crossdisciplinary perspective. (With a preface by Roger W. Shuy.) Washington, D.C. Pp. v + 151.

Review products

Center for Applied Linguistics, Sociolinguistics: a crossdisciplinary perspective. (With a preface by Roger W. Shuy.) Washington, D.C. Pp. v + 151.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

M. A. K. Halliday
M. A. K. Halliday
Affiliation:
Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences, Stanford, California, U.S.A.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
Language in Society , Volume 3 , Issue 1 , April 1974 , pp. 94 - 103
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baratz, J. C. (1969). A bi-dialectal task for determining language proficiency in economically disadvantaged Negro children. Child Development 40. 889–902.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bellack, A. A., Dliebard, H. M., Hyman, R. T. & Smith, F. L. Jr (1966). The language of the classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Bernstein, B. (1971). Class, codes and control I: theoretical studies towards a sociology of language. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Blom, J. P. & Gumperz, J. J. (1972). Some social determinants of verbal behaviour. In Gumperz, and Hymes, (eds), Directions in sociolinguistics. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Dumont, L. (1970). Homo hierarchicus. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Google Scholar
Fasold, R. W. (1970). Two models of socially significant linguistic variation. Lg 46. 51–63.Google Scholar
Ferguson, C. A. (1971). Absence of copula and the notion of simplicity. In Hymes, (ed.), Pidginization and creolization of languages. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fishman, J. A. & Lueders-Salmon, E. (1972). What has the sociology of language to say to the teacher? On teaching the standard variety to speakers of dialectal or sociolectal varieties. In John, , Cazden, and Hymes, (eds), Functions of language in the classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Flavell, J. H. et al. (1968). The development of role-taking and communication skills in children. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Garvin, P. & Mathiot, M. (1956). The urbanization of the Guarani language: a problem in language and culture. In Wallace, (ed.), Men and cultures: selected papers of the Fifth International Congress of Anthropological and Ethnological Sciences. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K. (In press). Sociological aspects of semantic change, In Proceedings of the Eleventh International Congress of Linguists. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Hasan, R. (1973). Code, register and social dialect. In Bernstein, B. (ed.), Class, codes and control II: applied studies towards a sociology of language. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Hawkins, P. R. (1969). Social class, the nominal group and reference. Language and Speech 12. 125–35.Google Scholar
Also in Bernstein, B. (ed.), Class, codes and control II: applied studies towards a sociology of language. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1966). The social stratification of English in New York City. Washington, D.C.: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1969). Contraction, deletion, and inherent variation of the English copula. Lg 45. 715–62.Google Scholar
McDavid, R. I. & McDavid, V. G. (1951). The relationship of the speech of American Negroes to the speech of whites. In Wolfram, W. and Clarke, N. H. (eds), Black–white speech relationships. Washington, D.C.: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Mackay, D., Thompson, B. & Schaub, P. (1970). Breakthrough to literacy. London: Longmans. Glendale, California: Bowmar, 1973.Google Scholar
Shuy, R. W., Wolfram, W. A. & Riley, W. (1967). Linguistic correlates of social stratification in Detroit speech. U.S. Office of Education, Co-operative Research Project 6–1347 (Final Report).Google Scholar
Williams, F. & Naremore, R. C. (1969). On the functional analysis of social class differences in modes of speech. Speech Monographs 36 (2). 77–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar