We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
REFERENCES
McArthur, L. Z., & Baron, R. M. (1983). Towards an ecological theory of social perception. Psychological Review90:215–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slama-Cazacu, T. (1977). Le concept de “syntaxe mixte.” Recherches autour d'une hypothèse. Études de linguistique appliquée27:114–23.Google Scholar
Ullmann, I. M. (1975). Psycholinguistik—Psychosemiotik. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht.Google Scholar
Burbank, J., & Steiner, P. (eds.) (1977). J. Mukařovský. The world and the verbal art. New Haven:Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Burbank, J., & Steiner, P. (1978). J. Mukařovský, Structure, sign, and function. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Garvin, P. L. (ed.) (1964). A Prague School reader on esthetics, literary structure, and style. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. K. (ed.) (1978). Recycling the Prague School Linguistic Circle. Ann Arbor, Mich.: Karoma.Google Scholar
Matejka, L., & Titunik, E. R. (eds.) (1976). Semiotics of art: Prague School contributions. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar