Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T21:01:43.118Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Backchannels across cultures: A study of Americans and Japanese1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2008

Sheida White
Sheida White
Affiliation:
Center for Development of Early Education, Kamehameha Schools, Honolulu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The frequency of listener responses, called backchannels, was studied in English conversations within and across two cultural groups: Americans from the midwestern United States and Japanese who were born and raised in Japan. The findings reveal that backchannels of several types are displayed far more frequently by Japanese listeners. This appears to be related to the greater use by Japanese of certain discourse constructions that favor backchannels, and to the Japanese culture. The Japanese listening style remains unchanged in cross-cultural conversations, but Americans alter listening style in the direction of their non-native interlocutors. The study found no evidence for the hypothesis that backchanneling conventions that are not shared contribute to negative personality attributions or stereotyping. (Conversational analysis, intercultural communication, Japanese and American English discourse)

Type
Articles
Information
Language in Society , Volume 18 , Issue 1 , March 1989 , pp. 59 - 76
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Arthur, L. L. (1978). The syntactic complexity of English and Japanese texts as determined by T-units. Proceedings of the 3rd HATJ-UH conference on Japanese Linguistics and Language Teaching. Honolulu, Hawaii.Google Scholar
Cambra, R., Ishii, S., & Klopf, D. (1980). Four studies of Japanese speech characteristics. Journal of the Chiba Prefectural Association of Senior High School English Teachers 16:31–36.Google Scholar
Chick, K. J. (1985). The interactional accomplishment of discrimination in South Africa. Language in Society 14(3):299–326.Google Scholar
Dittmann, A. T., & Llewellyn, L. G. (1968). Relationship between vocalizations and head nods as listener responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 9:79–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duncan, S. (1974). On the structure of speaker-auditor interaction during speaking turns. Language in Society 3(2): 161–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erickson, F. (1979). Talking down: Some cultural sources of miscommunication in interracial interviews. In Wolfgang, A. (ed.), Nonverbal behavior. New York: Academic. 99–126.Google Scholar
Ferguson, C. A. (1975). Toward a characterization of English foreigner talk. Anthropological Linguistics 17(1):1–14.Google Scholar
Giles, H. (1975). Speech style and social evaluation. London: Academic.Google Scholar
Gumperz, J. J. (1982). Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, J. J., Jupp, T. C., & Roberts, C. (1979). Crosstalk: A study of cross-cultural communication. Southhall, Middlesex: National Centre for Industrial Language Learning.Google Scholar
Hecht, M. L. (1978). The conceptualization and measurement of interpersonal communication satisfaction. Human Communication Research 4(3):253–64.Google Scholar
Klopf, D. W., & Cambra, R. E. (1979). Communication apprehension among college students in America, Australia, Japan, and Korea. The Journal of Psychology, 102:27–31.Google Scholar
Kuno, S. (1978). Japanese: A characteristic OV language. In Lehmann, W. P. (ed.), Syntactic typology. Austin: University of Texas Press. 70–78.Google Scholar
Kusanagi, Y. (1976). Teaching of Japanese honorifics in Hawaii. In Kusanagi, Y. (ed.), Japanese linguistics and language teaching: Proceedings of the First Japanese Language Festival. Honolulu: University of Hawaii at Manoa.Google Scholar
Lebra, T. S. (1976). Japanese patterns of behavior. Honolulu: The University of Hawaii Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDermott, J. F., Tseng, W. S., & Maretzki, T. W. (1980). People and cultures of Hawaii: A psychoculturalprofile. Honolulu: The University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Martin, S. (1975). A reference grammar of Japanese. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Maynard, S. K. (1986). On back-channel behavior in Japanese and English casual conversation. Linguistics 24:1079–108.Google Scholar
Mizutani, N. (1982). The listener's responses in Japanese conversation. Sociolinguistic Newsletter 13(1):33–38.Google Scholar
Okuda, K. (1975). Efficacy of speaking. Unpublished paper. International Christian University.Google Scholar
Patkowski, M. S. (1980). The sensitive period for the acquisition of syntax in a second language. Language Learning 30(2):449–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scarcella, R. C. (1983). Discourse accent in second language performance. In Gass, S. & Selinker, L. (eds.), Language transfer in language learning. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Snow, C. E., Eeden, R. V., & Muysken, P. (1981). The interactional origins of foreigner talk: Municipal employees and foreign workers. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 28:81–91.Google Scholar
Tannen, D. (1980). Toward a theory of conversational style: The machine gun question. Sociolinguistic Working Paper 1–16.Google Scholar
Taylor, H. M. (1979). English and Japanese in contrast. New York: Regents.Google Scholar
White, S. (1983). The listener's power. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
White, S. (1986). Functions of backchannels in English: A cross-cultural analysis of Americans and Japanese. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Georgetown University.Google Scholar
Wolfson, N. (1986). Research methodology and the question of validity. TESOL Quarterly 20(4):689–99.Google Scholar
Yngve, V. H. (1970). On getting a word in edgewise. Papers from the 6th regional meeting. Chicago Linguistic Society, 04.Google Scholar