Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T19:34:55.255Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Intelligent information presentation systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 July 2009

Bryan S. Murray
Bryan S. Murray
Affiliation:
LUTCHI Research Centre, Department of Computer Studies, Loughborough University of Technology, Loughborough, Leicester, UK (Email: B. S. [email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper discusses the development of Information Presentation Systems (IPS). It identifies that these systems have had two development paths; generic and application-specific. It discusses the main pieces of early work, and identifies the significant problems and shortcomings associated with them. The development of later systems is traced through to the present day, and outstanding research issues are identified.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Knowledge Engineering Review , Volume 9 , Issue 3 , September 1994 , pp. 269 - 286
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arens, Y, Miller, L, Shapiro, S and Sondheimer, N, 1988. “Automatic construction of user-interface displays”. In: Proceedings of AAAI-88, pp. 808–813.Google Scholar
Arens, Y, Miller, L and Sondheimer, N, 1991. “Presentation design using an integrated knowledge base”. In: Sullivan, JW and Tyler, SW (eds.), Intelligent User Interfaces. ACM Press, New York, pp. 241–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartlett, MW and Smith, LA, 1973. “Design of control and display panels using computer algorithms”. Human Factors 15(1) 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beach, R and Stone, M, 1983. “Graphical style towards high quality illustration”. Computer Graphics 17(3) 07, 127–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bench-Capon, TJM, 1990. Knowledge Representation: an approach to Artificial Intelligence. Academic Press.Google Scholar
Bertin, J, 1983. Semiology of Graphics. University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Borning, A, 1979. “ThingLab-a constraint-oriented simulation laboratory”. PhD dissertation, Department of Computer Science, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Borning, A and Duisberg, R, 1986. “Constraint-based tools for building user interfaces”. ACM Transactions on Graphics 5(4), 345–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowman, WJ, 1968. Graphic Communication. Wiley.Google Scholar
Brachman, RJ and Schmolze, JG, 1985. “An overview of the KL-ONE knowledge representation system”. Cognitive Science 9(2) 171–216.Google Scholar
Casner, SM, 1990. “A task-analytic approach to the automated design of information graphics”. PhD Thesis, University of Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
Casner, SM, 1993. Private communication.Google Scholar
Charniak, E, Gavin, M and Hendler, J, 1983. “The Frail/Nasi reference manual”. CS Tech. Report CS-83–06, Department of Computer Science, Brown University, RI.Google Scholar
Cleveland, WS and McGill, R, 1984. “Graphical perception: theory, experimentation and application to the development of graphical methods”. Journal of the American Statistics Association 79(387) 531–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culbert, C, 1988. CLIPS Reference Manual. NASA/Johnson Space Center, TX.Google Scholar
Edmonds, EA, 1987. “Adaptability response and knowledge”. Knowledge Based Systems 1(1) 3–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edmonds, EA, 1993. “The future of intelligent interfaces: not just ‘How?’ but ‘What?’ and ‘Why?”. In: Grey, Hefley and Murray, (eds.), Proceedings of International Workshop on Intelligent User Interfaces, Orlando, FL, 1–8 01, pp. 13–17.Google Scholar
Edmonds, EA and Murray, BS, 1992. “Intelligent presentation and dialogue management”. In: Marik, Stepahkova and Trappl, (eds.), Advanced Topics in Al. Springer Verlag, pp. 465–476.Google Scholar
Edmonds, EA, Candy, L, Murray, BS, 1993. “Knowledge Support Systems for Designers”. In: IJAI ' 93 Workshop on Artificial Intelligence in Design, 13th Intern ational Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Kaufmann, pp. 7–12.Google Scholar
Elhadad, M, 1988. “The FUF functional unifier: user manual”. Technical Report, Columbia University.Google Scholar
Feiner, S, Nagy, S and van, Dam A, 1982. “An experimental system for creating and presenting interactive graphical documents”. ACM Transactions on Graphics 1(1) 59–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feiner, S, 1985. “APEX: An experiment in the automated creation of pictorial explanations”. IEEE Computer Graphics Applications 5(11) 29–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feiner, S, 1991. “An architecture for knowledge-based graphical interfaces”. In: Sullivan, JW and Tyler, SW (ecls.), Intelligent User Interfaces. ACM, pp. 259–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feiner, S and McKeown, KR, 1990. “Coordinating text and graphics in explanation generation”. In: Proceedings of AAAI '90 National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Boston, MA, pp. 442–449.Google Scholar
Finger, JJ and Genersereth, MR, 1985. “RESIDUE –a deductive approach to design synthesis”. Tech. Rep. KSL-85–1, Computer Science Department, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Fischer, G, 1993. “Turning breakdowns into opportunities for creativity”. In: Proceedings International Symposium on Creativity and Cognition, 13–1504, Loughborough, UK.Google Scholar
Friedell, M, 1983. “Automatic graphics environment synthesis”. PhD dissertation, Department of Computer Engineering and Science, Case Western Reserve University.Google Scholar
Goldberg, AJ and Robson, D, 1983. Smalltalk-80: The language and its implementation. Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Goldstein, DA and Lamb, JC, 1967. “Visual coding using flashing lights”. Human Factors 9(5) 405–408.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gnanamgari, S, 1980. “Providing automatic graphic displays through defaults”. Proceedings of Third National Conf. of CSCSI, 05.Google Scholar
Green, BF and Anderson, LK, 1956. “Colour coding in a visual search task”. Journal of Experimental Psychology 57 19–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M, 1985. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Jarvenpaa, SL and Dickson, GW, 1988. “Graphics and managerial decision making: research based guidelines”. Communications of the ACM 31(6) 764–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Julesz, B, 1981. “Textons, the elements of texture perception, and their interaction”. Nature 290 91–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaczmarek, T, Bates, R and Robins, G. 1986. “Recent developments in NIKL”. In: Proceedings 0f AAAI-86, 08, Philadelphia, PA, pp. 978–985.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D and Henik, A 1981. “Perceptual organisation and attention”. In: Kubovy, and Pomerantz, (eds.), Perceptual Organisation. Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 181–211.Google Scholar
Levitt, D, 1984. “Machine tongues X: constraint languages”. Computer Music Journal 8 (1), 9–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lombardi, C, 1989. Experiments for determining the Assignment of Information to Media in COMET. Columbia University.Google Scholar
McAllester, DA, 1982. “Reasoning utility package user's manual”. AI Memo 667, MIT, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Mackinlay, J, 1986. “Automating the design of graphical presentations of relational information”. ACM Transactions on Graphics 5(2), 110–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackinlay, JD, 1991. “Search architectures for the automatic design of graphical presentations”. In: Sullivan, JW and Tyler, SW (eds.), Intelligent User Interfaces. ACM, pp. 281–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malinowsky, U, Kühme, T, Dieterich, H and Schneider-Hufschmidt, M, 1992. “A taxonomy of adaptive user interfaces”. In: Monk, Diaper and Harrison, (eds.), People and Computers VII. The British Computer Society, pp. 391–414.Google Scholar
Marshall, R, 1993. “Improving the quality of computer generated charts”. In: Salvendy, and Smith, (eds.), Hutnan-Computer Interaction: Software and Hardware interfaces–HCI International '93. Elsevier, pp. 597–602.Google Scholar
Mitchell, JG, Maybury, W and Sweet, R, 1979. Mesa Language Manual. CSL-79–3, Xerox PARC, USA.Google Scholar
Myers, BA, Vander, Zanden B and Dannenberg, RB, 1989. “Creating graphical objects by demonstratio”. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH on User interface Software, Banff, Alberta, Canada, pp. 95–104.Google Scholar
Myers, BA, Guise, DA, Dannenberg, RB, Zanden, BV, Kosbie, DS, Pervin, E, Mickish, A and Marchal, P, 1990. “GARNET: comprehensive support for graphical, highly interactive user interfaces”. IEEE Computer, 11, pp. 71–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neal, JG, Bettinger, KE, Byoun, JS, Dobes, Z and Thielman, CY, 1988. “An intelligent multi-media human- computer dialogue system”. In: Proceedings of Workshop Space Operations, Automation and Robotics (SOAR'88). Wright State University, pp. 245–251.Google Scholar
Neal, JG and Shapiro, SC, 1991. “Intelligent multi-media interface technology”. In: Sullivan, JW and Tyler, SW (eds.), intelligent User interfaces. ACM, pp. 11–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neisser, U, 1964. “Visual search”. Scientific American 210 94–102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rist, T and Andre, E, 1993. “Designing coherent multi-media presentations”. In: Salvendy, and Smith, (eds.), Human-Computer interaction: Software and Hardware Interfaces–HCI International '93. Elsevier, pp. 434–439.Google Scholar
Roth, SF and Mattis, J, 1990. “Data characterization for intelligent graphics presentation”. In: Proceedings of CHI '90 Conference, Seattle, WA.ACM, pp. 193–200.Google Scholar
Roth, SF and Mattis, J, 1991. “Automating the presentation of information”. In: Proceedings of the 7th IEEE Conference on Al Applications, Miami Beach, FL, pp. 90–97.Google Scholar
Roth, SF, Mattis, J and Mesnard, X. 1991. “Graphics and natural language as components of automatic explanation”. In: Sullivan, and Tyler, SW (eds.), Intelligent User interfaces. ACM, pp. 207–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roth, SF, 1993. Private communication.Google Scholar
Russell, S, 1985. “The compleat (sic) guide to MRS”. Tech. Rep. KSL-85–12, Computer Science Dept., Stanford University.Google Scholar
Seligmann, D and Feiner, S, 1989. “Specifying composite illustrations with communicative goals”. In: Proceedings UIST '89 ACM SIGGRAPH Symp. on User Interface Software and Technology, Williamsburg, VA, pp. 1–9.Google Scholar
Schmid, CF, 1983. Statistical Graphics: Design Principles and Practices. Wiley.Google Scholar
Searle, JR, 1969. Speech Acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, SC and Papaport, W, 1987. “SNePS considered as a fully Intensional Propositional Semantic Network”. In: Proceedings of AAAI-86, 08, Philadelphia, PA, pp. 278–283.Google Scholar
Smith, D, 1975. “PYGMALION: A creative programming environment”. Rep. AIM-260, Department of Computer Science, Stanford University.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutherland, I. 1963. “Sketchpad: A man-machine graphical communication system”. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swartout, WR, Paris, CL and Moore, JD, 1992. “Design for explainable expert systems”. IEEE Expert 6(3) 58–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tufte, ER, 1983. The Visual Display of Quantitative Information. Graphics Press, Cheshire, CT.Google Scholar
Tufte, ER, 1980. Envisioning Information. Graphics Press, Cheshire, CT.Google Scholar
Vibhu, O, Paris, M and Paris, GL, 1993. “Automatic document generation: the interaction of text and examples”. In: Proceedings of 13th International Joint Conference on Al, Chambery, France, pp. 1158–1163.Google Scholar
Zdybel, F, Greenfeld, NR, Yonke, MD and Gibbons, J, 1981. “An information presentation system”. In: 7th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vancouver, Canada, pp. 978–984.Google Scholar