Hostname: page-component-7b9c58cd5d-hxdxx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-14T18:03:36.728Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A review of multi-instance learning assumptions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2010

James Foulds  and
Eibe Frank
James Foulds*
Affiliation:
Department of Computer Science, University of Waikato, Private Bag 3105, Hamilton, New Zealand
Eibe Frank*
Affiliation:
Department of Computer Science, University of Waikato, Private Bag 3105, Hamilton, New Zealand
*
e-mail: [email protected], [email protected]
e-mail: [email protected], [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Multi-instance (MI) learning is a variant of inductive machine learning, where each learning example contains a bag of instances instead of a single feature vector. The term commonly refers to the supervised setting, where each bag is associated with a label. This type of representation is a natural fit for a number of real-world learning scenarios, including drug activity prediction and image classification, hence many MI learning algorithms have been proposed. Any MI learning method must relate instances to bag-level class labels, but many types of relationships between instances and class labels are possible. Although all early work in MI learning assumes a specific MI concept class known to be appropriate for a drug activity prediction domain; this ‘standard MI assumption’ is not guaranteed to hold in other domains. Much of the recent work in MI learning has concentrated on a relaxed view of the MI problem, where the standard MI assumption is dropped, and alternative assumptions are considered instead. However, often it is not clearly stated what particular assumption is used and how it relates to other assumptions that have been proposed. In this paper, we aim to clarify the use of alternative MI assumptions by reviewing the work done in this area.

Type
Articles
Information
The Knowledge Engineering Review , Volume 25 , Issue 1 , March 2010 , pp. 1 - 25
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amar, R., Dooly, D., Goldman, S., Zhang, Q. 2001. Multiple-instance learning of real-valued data. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Machine Learning, 3–10. ACM.Google Scholar
Andrews, S., Tsochantaridis, I., Hofmann, T. 2002. Support vector machines for multiple-instance learning. In Proceedings of the 16th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 15) 561–568. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Auer, P., Ortner, R. 2004. A boosting approach to multiple instance learning. In Proceedings of the 15th European Conference on Machine Learning, 63–74. Springer.Google Scholar
Blockeel, H., Page, D., Srinivasan, A. 2005. Multi-instance tree learning. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Machine Learning, 57–64. ACM.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burl, M. C., Weber, M., Perona, P. 1998. A probabilistic approach to object recognition using local photometry and global geometry. In Proceedings of the 5th European Conference on Computer Vision, 628–641. Springer.Google Scholar
Chen, Y., Bi, J., Wang, J. Z. 2006. MILES: Multiple-instance learning via embedded instance selection. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 28(12), 1931–1947.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, Y., Wang, J. Z. 2004. Image categorization by learning and reasoning with regions. Journal of Machine Learning Research 5, 913–939.Google Scholar
Cheung, P., Kwok, J. 2006. A regularization framework for multiple-instance learning. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Machine Learning, 193–200. ACM.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chevaleyre, Y., Zucker, J.-D. 2001. Solving multiple-instance and multiple-part learning problems with decision trees and rule sets. Application to the mutagenesis problem. In Proceedings of the 14th Biennial Conference of the Canadian Society for Computational Studies of Intelligence, 204–214. Springer.Google Scholar
Dietterich, T. G., Lathrop, R. H., Lozano-Pérez, T. 1997. Solving the multiple instance problem with axis-parallel rectangles. Artificial Intelligence 89(1–2), 31–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dong, L. 2006. A comparison of multi-instance learning algorithms. Master’s thesis, University of Waikato.Google Scholar
Dooly, D., Zhang, Q., Goldman, S., Amar, R. 2002. Multiple-instance learning of real-valued data. Journal of Machine Learning Research 3, 651–678.Google Scholar
Edgar, G. A. 1990. Measure, Topology, and Fractal Geometry, 2nd edn. Undergraduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El-Manzalawy, Y., Honavar, V. 2007. MICCLLR: A generalized multiple-instance learning algorithm using class conditional log likelihood ratio. Technical report, Computer Science Department, Iowa State University.Google Scholar
Foulds, J. 2008. Learning Instance Weights in Multi-Instance Learning. Master’s thesis, University of Waikato.Google Scholar
Frank, E., Xu, X. 2003. Applying propositional learning algorithms to multi-instance data. Technical report 06/03, Department of Computer Science, University of Waikato.Google Scholar
Gärtner, T. 2000. Kernel-based Feature Space Transformation in Inductive Logic Programming. Master’s thesis, University of Bristol.Google Scholar
Gärtner, T., Flach, P. A., Kowalczyk, A., Smola, A. 2002. Multi-instance kernels. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Machine Learning, 179–186. Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar
Kriegel, H., Pryakhin, A., Schubert, M. 2006. An EM-approach for clustering multi-instance objects. In Proceedings of the 10th Pacific-Asia Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 139–148. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krogel, M.-A., Wrobel, S. 2002. Feature selection for propositionalization. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Discovery Science, 430–434. Springer.Google Scholar
Kück, H., de Freitas, N. 2005. Learning about individuals from group statistics. In Proceedings of the 21th Annual Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, 332–339. AUAI Press.Google Scholar
Littlestone, N. 1987. Learning quickly when irrelevant attributes abound: A new linear-threshold algorithm. Machine Learning 2(4), 285–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maron, O. 1998. Learning from ambiguity. Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Maron, O., Lozano-Pérez, T. 1997. A framework for multiple-instance learning. In Proceedings of the 11th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, 570–576. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Maron, O., Ratan, A. L. 1998. Multiple-instance learning for natural scene classification. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Machine Learning, 341–349. Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar
Neuhaus, M., Bunke, H. 2007. A quadratic programming approach to the graph edit distance problem. In Proceedings of the 6th IAPR-TC-15 International Workshop on Graph Based Representations in Pattern Recognition, 92–102. Springer.Google Scholar
Qi, G.-J., Hua, X.-S., Rui, Y., Mei, T., Tang, J., Zhang, H.-J. 2007. Concurrent multiple instance learning for image categorization. In Proceeding of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 1–8. IEEE Computer Society.Google Scholar
Ramon, J., De Raedt, L. 2000. Multi instance neural networks. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning 2000 Workshop on Attribute-Value and Relational Learning.Google Scholar
Ray, S., Craven, M. 2005. Supervised learning versus multiple instance learning: an empirical comparison. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Machine Learning, 697–704. ACM.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ray, S., Page, D. 2001. Multiple instance regression. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Machine Learning, 425–432. Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar
Ruffo, G. 2000. Learning single and multiple instance decision trees for computer security applications. PhD thesis, Universida di Torino, Italy.Google Scholar
Schapire, R. E., Singer, Y. 2000. BoosTexter: A boosting-based system for text categorization. Machine Learning 39(2/3), 135–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, S., Zhang, J., Brown, J. 2005. On generalized multiple-instance learning. International Journal of Computational Intelligence and Applications 5(1), 21–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tao, Q., Scott, S. 2004. A faster algorithm for generalized multiple-instance learning. In Proceedings of the 17th International Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference, 550–555. AAAI Press.Google Scholar
Tao, Q., Scott, S., Vinodchandran, N. V., Osugi, T., Mueller, B. 2004a. An extended kernel for generalized multiple-instance learning. In Proceedings of the 16th IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence, 272–277. IEEE Computer Society.Google Scholar
Tao, Q., Scott, S., Vinodchandran, N., Osugi, T. T. 2004b. SVM-based generalized multiple-instance learning via approximate box counting. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Machine Learning, 779–806. ACM.Google Scholar
Tsoumakas, G., Katakis, I. 2007. Multi-Label classification: An overview. International Journal of Data Warehousing and Mining 3(3), 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagstaff, K., Lane, T. 2007. Salience assignment for multiple-instance regression. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning 2007 Workshop on Constrained Optimization and Structured Output Spaces.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, J., Zucker, J.-D. 2000. Solving the multiple-instance problem: A lazy learning approach. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Machine Learning, 1119–1125. Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar
Wang, Z., Radosavljevic, V., Han, B., Obradovic, Z. 2008. Aerosol optical depth prediction from satellite observations by multiple instance regression. In Proceedings of the SIAM International Conference on Data Mining, 165–176. SIAM.Google Scholar
Weidmann, N. 2003. Two-level classification for generalized multi-instance data. Master’s thesis, Albert Ludwigs University of Freiburg.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weidmann, N., Frank, E., Pfahringer, B. 2003. A two-level learning method for generalized multi-instance problems. In Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Machine Learning, 468–479. Springer.Google Scholar
Xu, X. 2003. Statistical Learning in Multiple Instance Problems. Master’s thesis, University of Waikato.Google Scholar
Xu, X., Frank, E. 2004. Logistic regression and boosting for labeled bags of instances. In Proceedings of the 8th Pacific-Asia Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 272–281. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, M-L., Zhou, Z.-H. 2009. Multi-instance clustering with applications to multi-instance prediction. Applied Intelligence 31(1), 47–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Q., Goldman, S. 2001. EM-DD: An improved multiple-instance learning technique. In Proceedings of the 15th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, 1073–1080. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Zhang, Q., Yu, W., Goldman, S., Fritts, J. 2002. Content-based image retrieval using multiple-instance learning. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Machine Learning, 682–689. Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar
Zhou, Z.-H., Sun, Y.-Y., Li, Y.-F. 2009. Multi-instance learning by treating instances as non-I.I.D. samples. In Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Machine Learning, 1249–1256. ACM.Google Scholar
Zhou, Z.-H., Xu, J.-M. 2007. On the relation between multi-instance learning and semi-supervised learning. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Machine learning, 1167–1174. ACM.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, Z.-H., Zhang, M.-L. 2006. Multi-instance multi-label learning with application to scene classification. In Proceedings of the 20th Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, 1609–1616. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Zhou, Z.-H., Zhang, M.-L. 2007. Solving multi-instance problems with classifier ensemble based on constructive clustering. Knowledge and Information Systems 11(2), 155–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar