No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Thomas C. Vinci, Space, Geometry, and Kant’s Transcendental Deduction of the CategoriesOxford: Oxford University Press, 2014 Pp. xii + 251 ISBN 9780199381166 (hbk) $74.00
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 08 October 2015
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Book Reviews
- Information
- Copyright
- © Kantian Review 2015
References
Allison, H. E. (2004) Kant’s Transcendental Idealism, 2nd edn. New Haven: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ameriks, K. (1978) ‘Kant’s Transcendental Deduction as a Regressive Argument’. Kant-Studien, 69, 273–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engstrom, S. (1994) ‘The Transcendental Deduction and Skepticism’. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 32 (1), 359–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henrich, D. (1969) ‘The Proof-Structure of Kant’s Transcendental Deduction’. Review of Metaphysics, 22 (4), 640–659.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1992) On the Form and Principles of the Sensible and the Intelligible World [Inaugural Dissertation]. In D. Walford (trans. and ed.), Theoretical Philosophy 1755–1770 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 373–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, I (1997) Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics. Trans. G. Hatfield. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, I (1998) Critique of Pure Reason. Trans. P. Guyer and A. W. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, I (2004) Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science. Trans. M. Friedman. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Longuenesse, B. (1998) Kant and the Capacity to Judge. Trans. C. T. Wolfe. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaddock, J. (2014) ‘Kant and the Most Difficult Thing that Could Ever Be Undertaken on Behalf of Metaphysics’. History of Philosophy Quarterly, 31 (1), 41–58.Google Scholar