We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Review Essay: Greenberg on Kant, Existence, and De Re Necessity - Robert Greenberg, Real Existence, Ideal Necessity: Kant’s Compromise and the Modalities without the Compromise. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2008. Pp. xviii + 211, $119.00, hbk. 978-3-11-021013-2
Published online by Cambridge University Press:
30 September 2014
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
Guyer, Paul (1987) Kant and the Claims of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1997) Prolegomena to any FutureMetaphysics. Trans. and ed. Gary Hatfield. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel (1998) Critique of Pure Reason. Trans. and ed. Paul Guyer and Allen Wood. New York and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kaplan, David (1969) ‘Quantifying In’. In Leonard Linsky (ed.), Reference and Modality. (London: Oxford University Press, 1971).Google Scholar
Moore, G. E. (1962) Some Main Problems of Philosophy. New York: Collier Books. (First published by Macmillan in 1953).Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. (1953) From a Logical Point of View. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. (1966) Ways of Paradox, and Other Essays. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Russell, Bertrand (1912) Problems of Philosophy. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stang, Nicholas (2014) ‘The Non-Identity of Appearances and Things in Themselves’. Noûs.Google Scholar
Van Cleve, James (1999) Problems from Kant. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar