Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
McElligott, Alan G.
and
Hayden, Thomas J.
1999.
Context-related vocalization rates of fallow bucks, Dama dama.
Animal Behaviour,
Vol. 58,
Issue. 5,
p.
1095.
Reby, David
Cargnelutti, Bruno
Joachim, Jean
and
Aulagnier, Stéphane
1999.
Spectral acoustic structure of barking in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus). Sex-, age- and individual-related variations.
Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences - Series III - Sciences de la Vie,
Vol. 322,
Issue. 4,
p.
271.
Fielding, Alan H.
1999.
Machine Learning Methods for Ecological Applications.
p.
1.
Fielding, Alan
1999.
Machine Learning Methods for Ecological Applications.
p.
209.
Boddy, Lynne
and
Morris, Colin W.
1999.
Machine Learning Methods for Ecological Applications.
p.
37.
Lawson, R. E.
Putnam, R. J.
and
Fielding, A. H.
2000.
Individual signatures in scent gland secretions of Eurasian deer.
Journal of Zoology,
Vol. 251,
Issue. 3,
p.
399.
McElligott, Alan G.
and
Hayden, Thomas J.
2001.
Postcopulatory vocalizations of fallow bucks: who is listening?.
Behavioral Ecology,
Vol. 12,
Issue. 1,
p.
41.
Semple, Stuart
2001.
Individuality and male discrimination of female copulation calls in the yellow baboon.
Animal Behaviour,
Vol. 61,
Issue. 5,
p.
1023.
TERRY, A. M.R.
MCGREGOR, P. K.
and
PEAKE, T. M.
2001.
A COMPARISON OF SOME TECHNIQUES USED TO ASSESS VOCAL INDIVIDUALITY.
Bioacoustics,
Vol. 11,
Issue. 3,
p.
169.
Reby, David
Hewison, Mark
Izquierdo, Marta
and
Pépin, Dominique
2001.
Red Deer (Cervus elaphus) Hinds Discriminate Between the Roars of Their Current Harem‐Holder Stag and Those of Neighbouring Stags.
Ethology,
Vol. 107,
Issue. 10,
p.
951.
Sousa-Lima, Renata S.
Paglia, Adriano P.
and
Da Fonseca, Gustavo A.B.
2002.
Signature information and individual recognition in the isolation calls of Amazonian manatees, Trichechus inunguis (Mammalia: Sirenia).
Animal Behaviour,
Vol. 63,
Issue. 2,
p.
301.
Terry, Andrew M. R.
and
McGregor, Peter K.
2002.
Census and monitoring based on individually identifiable vocalizations: the role of neural networks.
Animal Conservation,
Vol. 5,
Issue. 2,
p.
103.
PAGE, BRAD
GOLDSWORTHY, SIMON D.
and
HINDELL, MARK A.
2002.
INDIVIDUAL VOCAL TRAITS OF MOTHER AND PUP FUR SEALS.
Bioacoustics,
Vol. 13,
Issue. 2,
p.
121.
McCowan, Brenda
and
Hooper, Stacie L.
2002.
Individual acoustic variation in Belding’s ground squirrel alarm chirps in the High Sierra Nevada.
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,
Vol. 111,
Issue. 3,
p.
1157.
Reby, David
and
McComb, Karen
2003.
Anatomical constraints generate honesty: acoustic cues to age and weight in the roars of red deer stags.
Animal Behaviour,
Vol. 65,
Issue. 3,
p.
519.
Reby, David
and
McComb, Karen
2003.
Vol. 33,
Issue. ,
p.
231.
Darden, Safi K.
Dabelsteen, Torben
and
Pedersen, Simon Boel
2003.
A POTENTIAL TOOL FOR SWIFT FOX (VULPES VELOX) CONSERVATION: INDIVIDUALITY OF LONG-RANGE BARKING SEQUENCES.
Journal of Mammalogy,
Vol. 84,
Issue. 4,
p.
1417.
Searby, Amanda
and
Jouventin, Pierre
2005.
The double vocal signature of crested penguins: is the identity coding system of rockhopper penguins Eudyptes chrysocome due to phylogeny or ecology?.
Journal of Avian Biology,
Vol. 36,
Issue. 5,
p.
449.
Terry, Andrew MR
Peake, Tom M
and
McGregor, Peter K
2005.
The role of vocal individuality in conservation.
Frontiers in Zoology,
Vol. 2,
Issue. 1,
McElligott, A. G.
Birrer, M.
and
Vannoni, E.
2006.
Retraction of the mobile descended larynx during groaning enables fallow bucks (Dama dama) to lower their formant frequencies.
Journal of Zoology,
Vol. 270,
Issue. 2,
p.
340.