Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T03:17:12.835Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Seasonal habitat use by flying-foxes, Pteropus alecto and P. scapulatus (Megachiroptera), in monsoonal Australia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 March 2001

Michael J. Vardon
Affiliation:
Australian National University, School of Resource Management and Environmental Science, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia Wildlife Management International Pty Limited, P.O. Box 530, Sanderson, NT 0812, Australia
Peter S. Brocklehurst
Affiliation:
Department of Lands, Planning and Environment, P.O. Box 30, Palmerston, NT 0831, Australia
John C. Z. Woinarski
Affiliation:
Tropical Savannas CRC, Parks and Wildlife Commission, P.O. Box 496, Palmerston, NT 0831, Australia
Ross B. Cunningham
Affiliation:
Australian National University, Statistical Consulting Unit, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia
Christine F. Donnelly
Affiliation:
Australian National University, Statistical Consulting Unit, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia
Christopher R. Tidemann
Affiliation:
Australian National University, School of Resource Management and Environmental Science, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia
Get access

Abstract

Distributions of flying-fox (Pteropus alecto and P. scapulatus) were examined in relation to use of habitat in the essentially natural landscape of northern Australia. There were differences between the species in terms of the vegetation used for roosting and foraging, which were related to the reproductive cycle and seasonal variation in temperature, rainfall and the availability of preferred foods. Important habitats of P. alecto varied seasonally and included floodplain, mangrove, monsoon rainforest, Melaleuca open-forest, and Eucalyptus miniata/E. tetrodonta open-forest and woodland. The minimum scale at which conservation of P. alecto should be attempted is in the order of 5000 km2, based on seasonal patterns of habitat use. The size of this area will make conservation via traditional reserves difficult and conservation of important habitats outside reserves will be needed. Habitats protected for the benefit of P. alecto will also benefit P. scapulatus but because P. scapulatus is more mobile, displays greater yearly variation in distribution and is less well understood than P. alecto, appropriate conservation actions are less certain.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
2001 The Zoological Society of London

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)