Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T22:08:52.608Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Social and genetic mating system of Ridgway's hawk (Buteo ridgwayi), an endemic raptor on Hispaniola

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 November 2013

Lance G. Woolaver ,
Rina K. Nichols ,
Eugene S. Morton  and
Bridget J. M. Stutchbury
Lance G. Woolaver*
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, York University, 4700 Keele Street, Toronto, Ontario, M3J 1P3, Canada
Rina K. Nichols
Affiliation:
Wildlife Preservation Canada, RR#5 5420 Highway 6 North, Guelph, Ontario, N1H 6J2, Canada
Eugene S. Morton
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, York University, 4700 Keele Street, Toronto, Ontario, M3J 1P3, Canada
Bridget J. M. Stutchbury
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, York University, 4700 Keele Street, Toronto, Ontario, M3J 1P3, Canada
*
1Corresponding author. Present address: Durrell Wildlife Conservation Trust, BP 8511, 101 Antananarivo, Madagascar. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Patterns of social organization and mating systems have been shown to be functions of ecological factors such as resource allocation and breeding density. In some species, particularly birds, social organization and genetic mating systems differ with molecular studies providing evidence of extra-pair young frequently occurring within broods of socially monogamous species. Here we examine the social and genetic mating system of an ecologically little-known forest raptor endemic to the island of Hispaniola in the Caribbean. From 2005–2009, our field observations of over 60 breeding pairs verified a social mating system of monogamy for the species. During the same time period, we collected blood samples (n = 146 birds, 48 nests) and used microsatellite profiles from 10 loci to estimate genetic relatedness among nestlings in a brood and assign putative fathers. We found no evidence of extra-pair paternity in 41 broods. We had one instance where a social male was not assigned as the putative father, however, the confidence level of this assignment was not significant since the genotypes of the social and assigned males were very similar. Our results support our hypothesis that genetic monogamy would be exhibited by Ridgway's hawk, an island-endemic tropical raptor.

Keywords

Buteo ridgwayiextra-pair paternity (EPP)monogamynestling relatednesspaternity exclusiontropics
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Tropical Ecology , Volume 29 , Issue 6 , November 2013 , pp. 531 - 540
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE CITED

ALCAIDE, M., NEGRO, J. J., SERRANO, D., TELLA, J. T. & RODRIGUEZ, C. 2005. Extra-pair paternity in the Lesser Kestrel Falco naumanni: a re-evaluation using microsatellite markers. Ibis 147:608–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
AMARAL, F. S. R., SHELDON, F. H., GAMAUF, A., HARING, E., RIESING, M., SILVEIRA, L. F. & WAJNTAL, A. 2009. Patterns and processes of diversification in a widespread and ecologically diverse avian group, the buteonine hawks (Aves, Accipitridae). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 53:703–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ANKER-NILSSEN, T., KLEVEN, O., AARVAK, T. & LIFJELD, J. T. 2008. No evidence of extra-pair paternity in the Atlantic Puffin Fratercula arctica. Ibis 150:619–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ANKER-NILSSEN, T., KLEVEN, O., AARVAK, T. & LIFJELD, J. T. 2010. Low or no occurrence of extra-pair paternity in the Black Guillemot Cepphus grylle. Journal of Ornithology 151:247–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ARNOLD, K. E. & OWENS, I. P. F. 2002. Extra-pair paternity and egg dumping in birds: life history, parental care and the risk of retaliation. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 269:1263–1269.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
ARSENAULT, D. P., STACEY, P. B. & HOELZER, G. A. 2002. No extrapair fertilization in Flammulated Owls despite aggregated nesting. Condor 104:197–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BARRIENTOS, R. & LÓPEZ-DARIAS, M. 2006. A case of a polyandrous trio of Eurasian buzzards Buteo buteo on Fuerte Ventura Island, Canary Islands. Journal of Raptor Research 40:305–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BIRDLIFE INTERNATIONAL 2011. Threatened birds of the world. Birdlife International, Cambridge. 852 pp.Google Scholar
BIRKHEAD, T. R. 1979. Mate guarding in the Magpie Pica pica. Animal Behaviour 27:866–874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BIRKHEAD, T. R., ATKIN, L. & MØLLER, A. P. 1987. Copulation behaviour of birds. Behaviour 101:101–138.Google Scholar
BLOUIN, M. S. 2003. DNA-based methods for pedigree reconstruction and kinship analysis in natural populations. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18:503–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BLOUIN, M. S., PARSONS, M., LACAILLE, V. & LOTZ, D. S. 1996. Use of microsatellite loci to classify individuals by relatedness. Molecular Ecology 5:393–401.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
BOLLMER, J. L., SANCHEZ, T., CANNON, M. D., SANCHEZ, D., CANNON, B., BEDNARZ, J. C., DE VRIES, T., STRUVE, A. S. & PARKER, P. G. 2003. Variation in morphology and mating system among island populations of Galapagos hawks. Condor 105:428–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BRIGGS, C. W. & COLLOPY, M. W. 2012. Extra-pair paternity in Swainson's Hawks. Journal of Field Ornithology 83:41–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CASH, K. J. 1989. Three adult Swainson's hawks tending a nest. Condor 91:727–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CORY, C. B. 1885. The birds of Haiti and San Domingo. Estes and Lauriat, Boston.198 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DECKER, M. D., PARKER, P. G., MINCHELLA, D. J. & RABENOLD, K. N. 1993. Monogamy in black vultures: genetic evidence from DNA fingerprinting. Behavioural Ecology 4:29–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DELANNOY, C. A. & CRUZ, A. 1988. Breeding biology of the Puerto Rican Sharp-shinned Hawk (Accipiter striatus venator). Auk 105:649–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DEWOODY, J. A. 2005. Molecular approaches to the study of parentage, relatedness, and fitness: practical applications for wild animals. Journal of Wildlife Management 69:1400–1418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DOUGLAS, S. B., HEATH, D. D. & MENNILL, D. J. 2012. Low levels of extra-pair paternity in a neotropical duetting songbird, the Rufous-and-White Wren (Thryothorus rufalbus). Condor 114:393–400.Google Scholar
FAABORG, J., PARKER, P. G., DELAY, L., DE VRIES, T. J., BEDNARZ, J. C., MARIA PAZ, S., NARANJO, J. & WAITE, T. A. 1995. Confirmation of cooperative polyandry in the Galapagos hawk (Buteo galapagoensis). Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology 36:83–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FERGUSON-LEES, J. & CHRISTIE, D. A. 2001. Raptors of the world. Christopher Helm, London. 325 pp.Google Scholar
GAUTSCHI, B., GWENAËL, J., NEGRO, J. J., GODOY, J. A., MÜLLER, J. P. & SCHMID, B. 2003. Analysis of relatedness and determination of the source of founders in the captive bearded vulture Gypaetus barbatus population. Conservation Genetics 4:479–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GRIFFITH, S. C. 2000. High fidelity on islands: a comparative study of extrapair paternity in passerine birds. Behavioural Ecology 11:265–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GRIFFITH, S. C., OWENS, I. P. F. & THUMAN, K. A. 2002. Extra pair paternity in birds: a review of interspecific variation and adaptive function. Molecular Ecology 11:2195–2212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
HARCOURT, C. & OTTENWALDER, J. A. 1996. Hispaniola. 102–111 in Harcourt, C. S. & Sayer, J. A. (eds.). The conservation atlas of tropical forests, the Americas. IUCN, Gland.Google Scholar
HOGAN, F. E. & COOKE, R. 2010. Insights into the breeding behaviour and dispersal of the Powerful Owl (Ninox strenua) through the collection of shed feathers. Emu 110:178–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HULL, J. M., TUFTS, D., TOPINKA, J. R., MAY, B. P. & ERNEST, H. B. 2007. Development of 19 microsatellite loci for Swainson's Hawks (Buteo swainsoni) and other Buteos. Molecular Ecology Notes 7:346–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HUYVAERT, K. P., ANDERSON, D. J., JONES, T. C., DUAN, W. & PARKER, P. G. 2000. Extra-pair paternity in Waved Albatross. Molecular Ecology 9:1415–1419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
JOHNSON, P. C. D., FOWLIE, M. K. & AMOS, W. 2005. Isolation of microsatellite loci from the common buzzard, Buteo buteo (Aves: Accipitridae). Molecular Ecology Notes 5:208–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KALINOWSKI, S. T., TAPER, M. L. & MARSHALL, C. 2007. Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Molecular Ecology 16:1099–1106.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
KALINOWSKI, S. T., TAPER, M. L. & MARSHALL, T. C. 2010. Corrigendum. Molecular Ecology 19:1512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KIMBALL, R. T., PARKER, P. G. & BEDNARZ, J. C. 2003. Occurrence and evolution of cooperative breeding among diurnal raptors (Accipitridae and Falconidae). The Auk 120:717–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KINGMA, S. A., HALL, M. L., SEGELBACHER, G. & PETERS, A. 2009. Radical loss of an extreme extra-pair mating system. BMC Ecology 9:15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
KLEVEN, O., BJERKE, B. & LIFJELD, J. T. 2008. Genetic monogamy in the Common Crossbill (Loxia curvirostra). Journal of Ornithology 149:651–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KONOVALOV, D. A., MANNING, C. & HENSHAW, M. T. 2004. KINGROUP: a program for pedigree relationship reconstruction and kingroup assignments using genetic markers. Molecular Ecology Notes 4:779–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KORPIMÄKI, E., KATRIINA, L., MAY, C. A., PARKIN, D. T., POWELL, G. B., TOLONEN, P. & WETTON, J. H. 1996. Copulatory behaviour and paternity determined by DNA fingerprinting in Kestrels: effects of cyclic food abundance. Animal Behaviour 51:945–955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KRUEGER, T. R., WILLIAMS, D. A. & SEARCY, W. A. 2008. The genetic mating system of a tropical Tanager. Condor 110:559–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LABARBERA, K., LOVETTE, J. I. & LLAMBIAS, P. E. 2012. Mating opportunities, paternity, and sexual conflict: paternal care in northern and southern temperate house wrens. Behavioural Ecology and Sociobiology 66:253–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LATTA, S. C., RIMMER, C., KEITH, A., WILEY, J., RAFFAELE, H., MCFARLAND, K. & FERNANDEZ, E. 2006. Birds of the Dominican Republic and Haiti. Princeton University Press, Princeton. 258 pp.Google Scholar
LIN, T. T., YOU, E. M. & LIN, K. 2009. Social and genetic mating systems of the Asian Lesser White-toothed shrew, Crocidura shantungensis, in Taiwan. Journal of Mammology 90:1370–1380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MACDONALD, D. W., ATKINSON, R. P. D. & BLANCHARD, G. 1997. Spatial and temporal patterns in the activity of European moles. Oecologia 109:88–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MACEDO, R. H., KARUBIAN, J. & WEBSTER, M. S. 2008. Extra-pair paternity and sexual selection in socially monogamous birds: are tropical birds different? Auk 125:769–777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MAGUIRE, G. S. & MULDER, R. A. 2008. Low levels of extra-pair paternity in southern emu-wrens (Aves: Maluridae). Australian Journal of Zoology 56:79–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MASELLO, J. F., SRAMKOVA, A., QUILLFELDT, P., EPPLEN, J. T. & LUBJUHN, T. 2002. Genetic monogamy in burrowing parrots Cyanoliseus patagonus? Journal of Avian Biology 33:99–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MÜLLER, W., EPPLEN, J. T. & LUBJUHN, T. 2001. Genetic paternity analyses in little owls (Athene noctua): does the rate of paternal care select against extra-pair young? Journal of Ornithology 142:195–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NEUDORF, D. H. L. 2004. Extrapair paternity in birds: understanding variation among species. Auk 121:302–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NEWTON, I. 1979. Population ecology of raptors. Buteo Books, Vermillion. 399 pp.Google Scholar
QUELLER, D. C. & GOODNIGHT, K. F. 1989. Estimating relatedness using genetic markers. Evolution 43:258–275.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
RIMMER, C. C., TOWNSEND, J. M., TOWNSEND, A. K., FERNANDEZ, E. M. & ALMONTE, J. 2005. Avian diversity, abundance, and conservation status in the Macaya Biosphere Reserve of Haiti. Ornitologica Neotropical 16:219–230.Google Scholar
RUSSELLO, M. A. & AMATO, G. 2004. Ex-situ population management in the absence of pedigree information. Molecular Ecology 13:2829–2840.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
RUTZ, C. 2005. Extra-pair copulation and intraspecific nest intrusions in the Northern Goshawk Accipiter gentilis. Ibis 147:831–835.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SALADIN, V., RITSCHARD, M., ROULIN, A., BIZE, P. & RICHNER, H. 2007. Analysis of genetic parentage in the tawny owl (Strix aluco) reveals extra-pair paternity is low. Journal of Ornithology 148:113–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SANTANA, C. E., KNIGHTS, R. L. & TEMPLE, S. A. 1986. Parental care at a Red-tailed Hawk nest tended by three adults. Condor 88:109–l10.Google Scholar
SEUTIN, G., WHITE, B. N. & BOAG, P. T. 1991. Preservation of avian blood and tissue samples for DNA analyses. Canadian Journal of Zoology 69:82–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
STEWART, S. L. M., WESTNEAT, D. F. & RITCHISON, G. 2010. Extra-pair paternity in eastern bluebirds: effects of manipulated density and natural patterns of breeding synchrony. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 64:463–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
STUTCHBURY, B. J. M. & MORTON, E. S. 1995. The effect of breeding synchrony on extra-pair mating systems in songbirds. Behaviour 132:675–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
STUTCHBURY, B. J. M. & MORTON, E. S. 2001. Behavioral ecology of tropical birds. Academic Press, San Diego. 165 pp.Google Scholar
STUTCHBURY, B. J. M. & MORTON, E. S. 2008. Recent advances in the behavioural ecology of tropical birds. Wilson Journal of Ornithology 120:26–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
STUTCHBURY, B. J. M., MORTON, E. S. & WOOLFENDEN, B. 2007. Comparison of the mating system and breeding behaviour of a resident and migratory tropical flycatcher. Journal of Field Ornithology 78:40–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
TAYLOR, S. S., BOESSENKOOL, S. & JAMIESON, I. G. 2008. Genetic monogamy in two long-lived New Zealand passerines. Journal of Avian Biology 39:579–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
THORSTROM, R. 1996. Methods for trapping tropical forest birds of prey. Wildlife Society Bulletin 24:516–520.Google Scholar
TOWNSEND, A. K., BOWMAN, R., FITZPATRICK, J. W., DENT, M. & LOVETTE, I. J. 2011. Genetic monogamy across variable demographic landscapes in cooperatively breeding Florida scrub-jays. Behavioural Ecology 22:464–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WESTNEAT, D. F. & SHERMAN, P. W. 1997. Density and extra-pair fertilizations in birds: a comparative analysis. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 41:205–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WESTNEAT, D. F. & STEWART, I. R. K. 2003. Extra-pair paternity in birds: causes, correlates and conflict. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 34:365–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WETMORE, A. & LINCOLN, F. C. 1934. Additional notes on the birds of Haiti and the Dominican Republic. Proceedings of the U.S. National Museum 82:1–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WILEY, J. W. & WILEY, B. 1981. Breeding season ecology and behavior of Ridgway's Hawk Buteo ridgwayi. Condor 83:132–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WOOLAVER, L. G. 2011. Ecology and conservation genetics of Ridgway's Hawk Buteo ridgwayi. PhD Thesis, York University, Toronto. 313 pp.Google Scholar
WOOLAVER, L. G, NICHOLS, R. K., MORTON, E. & STUTCHBURY, B. J. 2013a. Feeding ecology and specialist diet of critically endangered Ridgway's Hawks. Journal of Field Ornithology 84:138–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WOOLAVER, L. G, NICHOLS, R. K., MORTON, E. & STUTCHBURY, B. J. 2013b. Population genetics and relatedness in a critically endangered island raptor, Ridgway's Hawk Buteo ridgwayi. Conservation Genetics 14:559–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WOJCZULANIS-JAKUBAS, K., JAKUBAS, D., OIGARDEN, T. & LIFJELD, J. T. 2009. Extrapair copulations are frequent but unsuccessful in a highly colonial seabird, the little auk Alle alle. Animal Behaviour 77:433–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar