Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T04:23:56.809Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Seed rain under the canopies of female and male Myrsine coriacea, a pioneer tree from the Brazilian Atlantic forest

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2013

Romualdo Morelatto Begnini  and
Tânia Tarabini Castellani
Romualdo Morelatto Begnini*
Affiliation:
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biologia Vegetal, Centro de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brasil
Tânia Tarabini Castellani
Affiliation:
Departamento de Ecologia e Zoologia, Centro de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brasil
*
1Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Isolated pioneer trees have been shown to increase the deposition of animal-dispersed seeds. The effect of gender on seed rain has not yet been investigated, and this study aimed to evaluate whether female and male plants of a pioneer dioecious zoochoric tree differ with respect to the seed rain under their canopies. Seed rain was evaluated for 13 mo, from October 2009 to October 2010, in secondary vegetation of the Atlantic forest in southern Brazil. We used 60 seed traps (0.5 m2): 40 traps under the crowns of 40 Myrsine coriacea (Primulaceae) trees (20 male and 20 female individuals) and 20 at sites without trees. We found 365071 diaspores belonging to 115 morphospecies from 37 families, and 38.3% of the morphospecies were trees, most of them zoochoric. The female trees accumulated a greater number of diaspores and species richness than male trees. The male trees accumulated a higher number of seeds and species than areas without trees. This study shows that sites containing female and male trees of M. coriacea and sites without trees differed significantly in terms of seed rain, and there is a gender effect in this dioecious, pioneer tree species because female plants promote an increase in the richness and abundance of diaspores.

Keywords

dioecious treesnatural perchesnucleationsecondary successionseed dispersaltropical forestzoochory
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Tropical Ecology , Volume 29 , Issue 5 , September 2013 , pp. 391 - 399
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE CITED

ALVAREZ-BUYLLA, E. R. & MARTINEZ-RAMOS, M. 1992. Demography and algometry of Cecropia obtusifolia, a neotropical pioneer tree – an evaluation of the climax-pioneer paradigm for tropical rain forests. Journal of Ecology 80:275–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BACCHI, O., LEITÃO FILHO, H. F. & ARANHA, C. 1984. Plantas invasoras de culturas no Estado de São Paulo. Editora da Universidade de Campinas, São Paulo. 309 pp.Google Scholar
BARROSO, G. M., MORIN, M. P., PEIXOTO, A. L. & ICHASO, C. L. F. 1999. Frutos e sementes – morfologia aplicada à sistemática de dicotiledôneas. Editora da Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa. 443 pp.Google Scholar
CARRIÈRE, S. M., ANDRÉ, M., LETOURMY, P., OLIVIER, I. & McKEY, D. B. 2002. Seed rain beneath remnant trees in a slash-and-burn agricultural system in southern Cameroon. Journal of Tropical Ecology 18:353–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CASTELLANI, T. T. & SANTOS, F. A. M. 2005. Abundância de ramos reprodutivos e produção de sementes em populações de Ipomoea pes-caprae (L.) R. Br. na Ilha de Santa Catarina, Brasil. Acta Botanica Brasilica 19:251–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CORLETT, R. T. & HAU, B. C. H. 2000. Seed dispersal and forest restoration. Pp. 317–325 in Elliott, S., Kerby, J., Blakesley, D., Hardwick, K., Woods, K. & Anusarnsunthorn, V. (eds). Forest restoration for wildlife conservation. International Tropical Timber Organization and The Forest Restoration Research Unit, Chiang Mai University, Thailand.Google Scholar
DUNCAN, R. S. & CHAPMAN, C. A. 1999. Seed dispersal and potential forest succession in abandoned agriculture in Tropical Africa. Ecological Applications 9:998–1008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FORERO-MONTAÑA, J., ZIMMERMAN, J. K. & THOMPSON, J. 2010. Population structure, growth rates and spatial distribution of two dioecious tree species in a wet forest in Puerto Rico. Journal of Tropical Ecology 26:433–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GALINDO-GONZÁLEZ, J., GUEVARA, S. & SOSA, V. 2000. Bat and bird generated seed rains at isolated trees in pastures in a tropical rainforest. Conservation Biology 14:1693–1703.Google Scholar
GAPLAN. 1986. Atlas de Santa Catarina. Aerofoto Cruzeiro S/A, Rio de Janeiro. 173 pp.Google Scholar
GROMBONE-GUARATINI, M. T. & RODRIGUES, R. R. 2002. Seed bank and seed rain in a seasonal semi-deciduous forest in south-eastern Brazil. Journal of Tropical Ecology 18:759–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GUEVARA, S., PURATA, S. E. & VAN DER MAAREL, E. 1986. The role of remnant forest trees in tropical secondary succession. Vegetatio 66:77–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GUEVARA, S., LABORDE, J. & SANCHEZ-RIOS, G. 2004. Rain forest regeneration beneath the canopy of fig trees isolated in pastures of Los Tuxtlas, Mexico. Biotropica 36:99–108.Google Scholar
HARDESTY, B. D. & PARKER, V. T. 2002. Community seed rain patterns and a comparison to adult community structure in a West African tropical forest. Plant Ecology 164:49–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HERRERA, J. M. & GARCÍA, D. 2009. The role of remnant trees in seed dispersal through the matrix: being alone is not always so sad. Biological Conservation 142:149–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HOLL, K. D. 1998. Do bird perching structures elevate seed rain and seedling establishment in abandoned tropical pasture? Restoration Ecology 6:253–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HOWE, H. F. & SMALLWOOD, J. 1982. Ecology of seed dispersal. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 13:201–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HOWE, H. F., URINCHO-PANTALEON, Y., PEÑA-DOMENE, M. & MARTÍNEZ-GARZA, C. 2010. Early seed fall and seedling emergence: precursors to tropical restoration. Oecologia 164:731–740.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
IBARRA-MANRIQUEZ, G. & OYAMA, K. 1992. Ecological correlates of reproductive traits of Mexican rain forest trees. American Journal of Botany 79:383–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KLEIN, R. M. 1980. Ecologia da flora e vegetação do Vale do Itajaí (continuação). Sellowia 32:165–389.Google Scholar
KLEIN, R. M. 1981. Fisionomia, importância e recursos da vegetação do Parque Estadual da Serra do Tabuleiro. Sellowia 33:5–57.Google Scholar
KUARAKSA, C., ELLIOTT, S. & HOSSAERT-MCKEY, M. 2012. The phenology of dioecious Ficus spp. tree species and its importance for forest restoration projects. Forest Ecology and Management 265:82–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LEGENDRE, P. & LEGENDRE, L. 1998. Numerical ecology. (Second edition). Elsevier, Amsterdam. 853 pp.Google Scholar
LEITÃO FILHO, H. F., ARANHA, C. & BACCHI, O. 1972. Plantas invasoras de culturas no Estado de São Paulo. Volume 1. Hucitec, São Paulo. 291 pp.Google Scholar
LEITÃO FILHO, H. F., ARANHA, C. & BACCHI, O. 1975. Plantas invasoras de culturas no Estado de São Paulo. Volume 2. Hucitec, São Paulo. 306 pp.Google Scholar
LORENZI, H. 2002a. Árvores brasileiras – Manual de identificação e cultivo de plantas arbóreas nativas do Brasil. (Quarta edição), Volume 1. Instituto Plantarum, Nova Odessa. 368 pp.Google Scholar
LORENZI, H. 2002b. Árvores brasileiras – Manual de identificação e cultivo de plantas arbóreas nativas do Brasil. (Segunda edição), Volume 2. Instituto Plantarum, Nova Odessa. 368 pp.Google Scholar
LORENZI, H. 2009. Árvores brasileiras – Manual de identificação e cultivo de plantas arbóreas nativas do Brasil. (Primeira edição), Volume 3. Instituto Plantarum, Nova Odessa. 384 pp.Google Scholar
PASCOTTO, M. C. 2007. Rapanea ferruginea (Ruiz & Pav.) Mez. (Myrsinaceae) como uma importante fonte alimentar para as aves em uma mata de galeria no interior do Estado de São Paulo. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia 24:735–741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PINHEIRO, A. L. & CARMO, A. P. T. 1993. Contribuição ao estudo tecnológico da Canela-azeitona, Rapanea ferruginea (Ruiz e Pav.) Mez, uma espécie pioneira. I. Características anatômicas da madeira. Ciência Florestal 1:121–145.Google Scholar
PIVELLO, V. R., PETENON, D., JESUS, F. M., MEIRELLES, S. T., VIDAL, M. M., ALONSO, R. A. S., FRANCO, G. A. D. C. & METZGER, J. P. 2006. Chuva de sementes em fragmentos de floresta atlântica (São Paulo, SP, Brasil), sob diferentes situações de conectividade, estrutura florestal e proximidade da borda. Acta Botanica Brasilica 20:845–859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
REITZ, R., KLEIN, R. M. & REIS, A. 1979. Madeiras do Brasil: Santa Catarina. Lunardelli, Florianópolis. 320 pp.Google Scholar
SLOCUM, M. G. 2001. How tree species differ as recruitment foci in a tropical pasture. Ecology 82:2547–2559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SLOCUM, M. G. & HORVITZ, C. C. 2000. Seed arrival under different genera of trees in a neotropical pasture. Plant Ecology 149:51–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VAN DER PIJL, L. 1972. Principles of dispersal in higher plants. (Second edition). Springer-Verlag, Berlin. 160 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VIEIRA, D. C. M. & GANDOLFI, S. 2006. Chuva de sementes e regeneração natural sob três espécies arbóreas em uma floresta em processo de restauração. Revista Brasileira de Botânica 29:541–554.Google Scholar
WILMS, J. J. A. M. & KAPPELLE, M. 2006. Frugivorous birds, habitat preference and seed dispersal in a fragmented Costa Rican montane oak forest landscape. Ecological Studies 185:309–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ZAR, J. H. 1996. Biostatistical analysis. (Fourth edition). Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. 662 pp.Google Scholar