Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T11:16:18.919Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Resilience of secondary forest regrowth after slash-and-burn agriculture in central Amazonia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 July 2005

Christoph Gehring
Affiliation:
Agroecologia, Universidade estadual de Maranhão, São Luis, Brazil
Manfred Denich
Affiliation:
Center for Development Research (ZEF), Univ. Bonn, Germany
Paul L. G. Vlek
Affiliation:
Center for Development Research (ZEF), Univ. Bonn, Germany

Abstract

This study describes forest succession following slash-and-burn agriculture in central Amazonia, based on four chronosequences (22 sites) of 2- to 25-y-old secondary regrowth and mature forest. Biomass accumulated in the form of a saturation curve: 25 y of regrowth restored half of the mature-forest biomass, 75% would be restored after an estimated 175 y. Biomass accumulation was accompanied by a rapid decrease in woody plant density and an increase of the positive skew of plant size distribution. Liana biomass share declined from 5.0% in young to 1.9% in old regrowth, and 1.3% in mature forest, whereas the share of palms was low (0.5%) in young regrowth and high in old regrowth (1.8%) and mature forest (2.2%). 25-y-old regrowth was similar with mature forest in respect to woody plant density and growth-form composition, but both the plant size distribution and the number of stems per plant differed strongly from mature forest. A moderate increase in land use had only minor effects on biomass accumulation, but profoundly changed structural characteristics of regrowth, pointing to a high vulnerability to degradation. Thus, the sustainability of slash-and-burn in central Amazonia may be lower than the rapid initial biomass accumulation would make it seem.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
2005 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)