Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T05:51:30.179Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Relationships between rainfall, nesting habitat and fecundity of Caiman crocodilus yacare in the Pantanal, Brazil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

Zilca Campos  and
William Magnusson
Zilca Campos
Affiliation:
EMBRAPA/CPAP Cxp. 109, 79320–900 Corumbá, MS, Brazil
William Magnusson
Affiliation:
INPA/Ecologia Cxp. 487, 69011–970, Manaus, AM, Brazil
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Differences in rainfall between years influenced the proportions of different types of nesting habitats of Caiman crocodilus yacare available near water bodies in a region of intermittent rivers (Campo Dora Ranch). In contrast, rainfall had little effect on the proximity of nesting habitat to water bodies in a region of isolated lakes (Nhumirim Ranch). There was a strong positive correlation between female body size and clutch size Snout-vent lengths of females on Campo Dora Ranch were significantly larger than those from Nhumirim Ranch which probably accounts for the larger mean clutch size than in the region of isolated lakes. Hatchling size was correlated with egg size, but there was no relationship between egg size and female size or egg size and clutch size.

Keywords

BrazilCaiman crocodilus yacareclutch sizeCrocodiliafecundityPantanal
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Tropical Ecology , Volume 11 , Issue 3 , August 1995 , pp. 351 - 358
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE CITED

Ballinger, R. E. 1983. Life-history variations. Pp. 241–260 in Huey, R., Pianka, E. R. & Shoener, T. W. (eds). Lizard ecology: studies on a model organism. Harvard University Press, Cambridge. 501 pp.Google Scholar
Cadavid, E. A. G. 1984. O clima no Pantanal Matogrossense. Technical Circular, EMBRAPA/UEPAE, Corumbá. 39 pp.Google Scholar
Campos, Z. 1993. Effect of habitat on survival of eggs and sex ratio of hatchlings of Caiman crocodilus yacare in the Pantanal; Brazil. Journal of Herpetology 27(2): 127–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cintra, R. 1988. Nesting ecology of the Paraguayan Caiman (Caiman yacare) in the Brasilian Pantanal. Journal of Herpetology 22:219–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cott, H. B. 1961. Scientific results of an inquiry into the ecology and economic status of the Nile Crocodile (Crocodylus niloticus) in Uganda and northern Rhodesia. Transactions of the Zoological Society, London 29:211–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawshaw, P. G. 1987. Nesting ecology of the Paraguayan (Caiman yacare) in the Pantanal of Mato Grosso, Brazil. Unpublished MSc thesis. Gainesville, University of Florida. 68 pp.Google Scholar
Crawshaw, P. G. & Schaller, G. 1980. Nesting of Paraguayan Caiman, Caiman yacare, in Brazil. Papeis Avulsos de Zoology, S. Paulo 33:283–292.Google Scholar
Deitz, D. C. & Hines, T. C. 1980. Alligator nesting in North-Central Florida. Copeia 249–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, M. W. J. & Joanen, T. 1983. Temperature-dependent sex deterination in Alligator mississippiensis. Journal of Zoology, London 200:143–177.Google Scholar
Graham, A. 1968. The Lake Rudolf Crocodile (Crocodylus niloticus, Laurenti). Report to the Kenya Game Department by Wildlife Services, 145 pp.Google Scholar
Hall, P. M. & Johnson, D. R. 1987. Nesting biology of Crocodylus novaeguineae in the Lake Murray district, Papua New Guinea. Herpetologica 43:249–258.Google Scholar
Jacobsen, T. & Kushlan, J. A. 1989. Growth dynamics in the American alligator (Alligator mississippiensis). Journal of Zoology, London 219:309–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joanen, T. 1969. Nesting ecology of alligators in Louisiana. Proceedings Annual Conference Southeastern Association Game and Fish Commissioners 23:141–151.Google Scholar
Joanen, T. & McNease, L. 1987. Alligator farming research in Louisiana, USA. Pp. 409–415 in Webb, G. J. W., Manolis, S. C. & Whitehead, P. J. (eds). Wildlife management: crocodiles and alligators. Surrey Beatty & Sons, Chipping Norton, Australia.Google Scholar
Joanen, T. & McNease, L. 1989. Ecology and physiology of nesting and early development of the American alligator. American Zoology 29:987–988.Google Scholar
Kushlan, J. A. & Jacobsen, T. 1990. Environmental variability and the reproductive success of Everglades alligators. Journal of Herpetology 24:176–184.Google Scholar
Messel, H. & Vorlicek, G. C. 1989. Ecology of Crocodylus porosus in northern Australia. Pp. 164–183 in Hall, P. & Bryant, R. (eds). Crocodiles: their ecology, management and conservation. IUCN Publication New Series, Gland, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Packard, G. C., Packard, M. J., Miller, M. J. & Boardman, T. J. 1987. Influence of moisture, temperature, and substrate on snapping turtle eggs and embryos. Ecology 68:983–993.Google Scholar
Siegel, R. A. & Fitch, H. S. 1985. Annual variation in reproduction in snakes in a fluctuating environment. Journal of Animal Ecology 54:497–505.Google Scholar
Turner, F. B. 1977. The dynamics of populations of squamates, crocodilians and rhynchocephalians. Pp. 157–264 in Gans, C. & Tinkle, D. W. (eds). Biology of the Reptilia, Vol. 7. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar