Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T13:19:30.148Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of habitat degradation on mixed-species bird flocks in Indian rain forests

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2008

Hari Sridhar  and
K. Sankar
Hari Sridhar*
Affiliation:
Wildlife Institute of India, Post Bag #18, Chandrabani, Dehradun – 248001, Uttarakhand, India
K. Sankar
Affiliation:
Wildlife Institute of India, Post Bag #18, Chandrabani, Dehradun – 248001, Uttarakhand, India
*
1Corresponding author. Current address: Centre for Ecological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science, Malleswaram, Bangalore – 560012, Karnataka, India. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Habitat degradation affects mixed-species bird flocks (flock hereafter) through two mechanisms – changes in the bird community from which flocks are drawn and changes in the propensities of species to flock. We determined the relative influence of these two mechanisms by examining variation in flocks across nine rain-forest fragments (range 11–2600 ha) in a plantation landscape in the Western Ghats, India. We found differences between fragments in average number of species (range 10.8–15.2) and individuals (range 19.0–37.6) per flock, number of species that participated in flocks (range 34–59), encounter rates (range 0.5–2.4 flocks h−1) and flock composition. Multiple regression and randomization tests revealed that different mechanisms contributed to this variation. Three flock variables (open-forest individuals per flock, total open-forest species that participated in flocks in a fragment, flock composition) mainly reflected changes in the bird communities of fragments. Habitat structure strongly influenced three flock variables (open-forest species per flock, total and rain-forest individuals per flock) and flock composition to a lesser extent. Finally, flock encounter rate was strongly related to fragment area, but not to abundance of flock participants indicating habitat degradation-induced changes in propensities of species to flock.

Keywords

avian community ecologyhabitat degradationinterspecific interactionsmixed-species flockstropical rain forestsWestern Ghats
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Tropical Ecology , Volume 24 , Issue 2 , March 2008 , pp. 135 - 147
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE CITED

ACHARD, F., EVA, H. D., STIBIG, H.-J., MAYAUX, P., GALLEGO, J., RICHARDS, T. & MALINGREAU, J.-P. 2002. Determination of deforestation rates of the world's humid tropical forests. Science 297:999–1002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
ALI, S. & RIPLEY, S. D. 1983. Handbook of the birds of India and Pakistan (Compact edition). Oxford University Press, Delhi. 794 pp.Google Scholar
CHEN, C.-C. & HSIEH, F. 2002. Composition and foraging behaviour of mixed-species flocks led by the Grey-cheeked Fulvetta in Fushan Experimental Forest, Taiwan. Ibis 144:313–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DANIELS, R. J. R., JOSHI, N. V. & GADGIL, M. 1992. On the relationship between bird and woody plant species diversity in the Uttara Kannada district of south India. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 89:5311–5315.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DEBINSKI, D. M. & HOLT, R. D. 2000. A survey and overview of habitat fragmentation experiments. Conservation Biology 14:342–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DEVELEY, P. F. & PERES, C. A. 2000. Resource seasonality and the structure of mixed species bird flocks in a coastal Atlantic forest of southeastern Brazil. Journal of Tropical Ecology 16:33–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DOLBY, A. S. & GRUBB, T. C. 1998. Benefits to satellite members in mixed-species foraging groups: an experimental analysis. Animal Behaviour 56:501–509.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DOLBY, A. S. & GRUBB, T. C. 1999. Functional roles in mixed-species foraging flocks: a field manipulation. Auk 116:557–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FAHRIG, L. 2003. Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 34:487–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FERNÁNDEZ–JURICIC, E. 2000. Forest fragmentation affects winter flock formation of an insectivorous guild. Ardea 88:235–241.Google Scholar
GOODALE, E. & KOTAGAMA, S. W. 2005. Testing the roles of species in mixed-species bird flocks in a Sri Lankan rain forest. Journal of Tropical Ecology 21:669–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GOTELLI, N. J. & ELLISON, A. M. 2004. A Primer of Ecological Statistics. Sinauer Associates, Inc. Publishers, Sunderland. 479 pp.Google Scholar
GRAVES, G. R. & GOTELLI, N. J. 1993. Assembly of avian mixed-species flocks in Amazonia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 90:1388–1391.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
GRIMMETT, R., INSKIPP, C. & INSKIPP, T. 1998. Birds of the Indian Subcontinent. Oxford University Press, Delhi. 784 pp.Google Scholar
HAILA, Y. 2002. A conceptual genealogy of fragmentation research: from island biogeography to landscape ecology. Ecological Applications 12:321–334.Google Scholar
HART, P. J. & FREED, L. A. 2003. Structure and dynamics of mixed-species flocks in a Hawaiian rainforest. The Auk 120:1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HUTTO, R. 1994. The composition and social organization of mixed-species flocks in a tropical deciduous forest in western Mexico. The Condor 96:105–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
JULLIEN, M. & CLOBERT, J. 2000. The survival value of flocking in neotropical birds: reality or fiction? Ecology 81:3416–3430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
JULLIEN, M. & THIOLLAY, J.-M. 1998. Multi-species territoriality and dynamics of neotropical understory bird flocks. Journal of Animal Ecology 67:227–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KOTAGAMA, S. W. & GOODALE, E. 2004. The composition and spatial organisation of mixed-species flocks in a Sri Lankan rainforest. Forktail 20:63–70.Google Scholar
KREBS, C. J. 1989. Ecological methodology. Harper Collins Publishers, New York. 654 pp.Google Scholar
LATTA, S. C. & WUNDERLE, J. M. 1996. The composition and foraging ecology of mixed-species flocks in pine forests of Hispaniola. The Condor 98:595–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LEE, T. M., SOH, M. C. K., SODHI, N., KOH, L. P. & LIM, S. L. H. 2005. Effects of habitat disturbance on mixed species bird flocks in a tropical sub-montane rainforest. Biological Conservation 122;193–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LOVEJOY, T. E., BIERREGAARD, R. O., RYLANDS, A. B., MALCOLM, J. B., QUINTELA, C., HARPER, L. H., BROWN, K. S., POWELL, A. H., POWELL, G. V. N., SCHUBART, H. O. R. & HAYS, M. B. 1986. Edge and other effects of isolation on Amazon forest fragments. Pp. 257–285 in Soulé, M. A. (ed.) Conservation biology. The science of scarcity and diversity. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland.Google Scholar
MALDONADO-COELHO, M. & MARINI, M. A. 2000. Effects of forest fragment size and successional stage on mixed-species bird flocks in southeastern Brazil. Condor 102:585–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MALDONADO-COELHO, M. & MARINI, M. A. 2004. Mixed-species bird flocks from Brazilian Atlantic forest: the effects of forest fragmentation and seasonality on their size, richness and stability. Biological Conservation 116:19–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MENON, V. 2003. A field guide to Indian mammals. Dorling Kindersley, New Delhi. 200 pp.Google Scholar
MCCLURE, H. E. 1967. The composition of mixed species flocks in lowland and sub-montane forests of Malaya. Wilson Bulletin 79:131–154.Google Scholar
MORSE, D. H. 1977. Feeding behavior and predator avoidance in heterospecific groups. Bioscience 27:332–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MOYNIHAN, M. 1962. The organization and probable evolution of some mixed species flocks of neotropic birds. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections 143:1–140.Google Scholar
MUNN, C. A. & TERBORGH, J. W. 1979. Multi-species territoriality in neotropical foraging flocks. Condor 81:338–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MYERS, N., MITTERMEIER, R. A., MITTERMEIER, C. G., DA FONSECA, G. A. B. & KENT, J. 2000. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403:853–858.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
NAIR, S. C. 1991. The southern Western Ghats: a biodiversity conservation plan. INTACH, New Delhi. 92 pp.Google Scholar
PASCAL, J. P. 1988. Wet evergreen forest of the Western Ghats of India: ecology, structure, floristic composition, and succession. Institut Français de Pondichéry, Pondicherry. 345 pp.Google Scholar
POWELL, G. V. N. 1979. Structure and dynamics of interspecific flocks in a neotropical mid-elevation rainforest. Auk 96:375–390.Google Scholar
POWELL, G. V. N. 1989. On the possible contribution of mixed species flocks to species richness in neotropical avifaunas. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 24:387–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
RAMAN, T. R. S. 2001. Community ecology and conservation of tropical rainforest birds in the southern Western Ghats, India. PhD thesis, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore.Google Scholar
RAMAN, T. R. S. 2003. Assessment of census techniques for inter-specific comparisons of tropical rainforest bird densities. Ibis 145:9–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
RAMAN, T. R. S., RAWAT, G. S. & JOHNSINGH, A. J. T. 1998. Recovery of tropical rainforest avifauna in relation to vegetation succession following shifting cultivation in Mizoram, north-east India. Journal of Applied Ecology 35:214–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SRIDHAR, H. 2005. Patterns in mixed-species flocking of birds in rainforest fragments of the southern Western Ghats. MSc thesis, Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun.Google Scholar
STATTERSFIELD, A. J., CROSBY, M. J., LONG, A. J. & WEGE, D. C. 1998. Endemic bird areas of the world: priorities for biodiversity conservation. Birdlife International Conservation Series No. 7, Cambridge. 848 pp.Google Scholar
STOTZ, D. F. 1993. Geographic variation in species composition of mixed species flocks in lowland humid forests in Brazil. Papéis Avulsos Zoologia 38:61–75.Google Scholar
STOUFFER, P. C. & BIERREGAARD, R. O. 1995. Use of Amazonian forest fragments by understory insectivorous birds. Ecology 76:2429–2445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
TELLERÍA, J. L., VIRGÓS, E., CARBONELL, R., PÉREZ-TRIS, J. & SANTOS, T. 2001. Behavioural responses to changing landscapes: flock structure and anti-predator strategies of tits wintering in fragmented forests. Oikos 95:253–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
TERBORGH, J. W. 1990. Mixed flocks and polyspecific associations: costs and benefits of mixed groups to birds and monkeys. American Journal of Primatology 21:87–100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
TERBORGH, J., LOPEZ, L., NUÑEZ, P., RAO, M., SHAHABUDDIN, G., ORIHUELA, G., RIVEROS, M., ASCANIO, R., ADLER, G. H., LAMBERT, T. D. & BALBAS, L. 2001. Ecological meltdown in predator-free forest fragments. Science 294:1923–1926.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
THIOLLAY, J.-M. 1993. Response of a raptor community to shrinking area and degradation of tropical rain forest in the South Western Ghats (India). Ecography 16:97–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
THIOLLAY, J.-M. 1997. Disturbance, selective logging and bird diversity: a Neotropical forest study. Biodiversity and Conservation 6:1155–1173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
THIOLLAY, J.-M. 1999a. Responses of an avian community to rainforest degradation. Biodiversity and Conservation 8:513–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
THIOLLAY, J.-M. 1999b. Frequency of mixed species flocking in tropical forest birds and correlates of predation risk: an intertropical comparison. Journal of Avian Biology 30:282–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
TURNER, I. M. 1996. Species loss in fragments of tropical rainforest: a review of the evidence. Journal of Applied Ecology 33:200–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VAN HOUTAN, K. S., PIMM, S. L., BIERREGAARD, R. O., LOVEJOY, T. E. & STOUFFER, P. C. 2006. Local extinctions in flocking birds in Amazonian forest fragments. Evolutionary Ecology Research 8:129–148.Google Scholar