Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T03:37:28.971Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Distribution and abundance of a tropical rodent, the spiny rat, on islands in Panama

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

Gregory H. Adler  and
Joshua O. Seamon
Gregory H. Adler
Affiliation:
Department of Population Sciences, School of Public Health, Harvard University, 665 Huntington Avenue, Boston MA 02115, USA
Joshua O. Seamon
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Boston University, 5 Cumminglon Street, Boston, MA 02215, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The insular distribution and abundance of the spiny rat (Proechimys semispinosus) were studied by live-trapping rats on 50 small forested islands in Gatun Lake, Republic of Panama. Rats were found on 29 of these islands. Rat abundance was not correlated with island size or isolation, in contrast to temperate rodents, and may be due to the highly patchy nature of tropical forests and the differing floristic compositions of the study islands. Rat occurrence on islands was related positively to island size and negatively to island isolation. All islands greater than 2.1 ha contained spiny rats, whereas most islands less than 0.9 ha did not contain rats. The relationship between occurrence, size, and isolation are illustrated by a three-dimensional response surface. Results suggest that colonization and extinction regularly occur on these islands and that (1) larger islands with year-round fruit production, regardless of isolation, will have persistent populations of rats, (2) small isolated islands will never or only very rarely have rats owing to a lack of a year-round food source and the difficulty of immigration, and (3) small near islands frequently will have rats when fruits arc present. No other species of mouse-or rat-like rodents were captured on the islands. We suggest that P. semispinosus is a better colonist than other sympatric forest species, is more of a habitat generalist, and has a more flexible demographic structure allowing persistence in heterogeneous and changing environments.

Keywords

Gatun LakeislandsPanamaProechimys semispinosusrodentsspiny rat
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Tropical Ecology , Volume 7 , Issue 3 , August 1991 , pp. 349 - 360
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE CITED

Adler, G. H. & Wilson, M. L. 1985. Small mammals on Massachusetts islands: the use of probability functions in clarifying biogeographic relationships. Oecologia (Berlin) 66:178–186.Google Scholar
Adler, G. H. & Wilson, M. L. 1987. Demography of a habitat generalist, the white-footed mouse, in a heterogeneous environment. Ecology 68:1785–1796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, G. H. & Wilson, M. L. 1989. Insular distributions of voles and shrews: the rescue effect and implications for species co-occurrence patterns. Coenoses 4:69–72.Google Scholar
Adler, G. H., Wilson, M. L. & Derosa, M. J. 1986. Influence of island area and isolation on population characteristics of Peromyscus leucopus. Journal of Mammalogy 67:406–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowell, K. L. 1973. Experimental zoogeography: introductions of mice to small islands. American Naturalist 107:535–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowell, K. L. 1986. A comparison of relict versus equilibrium models for insular mammals of the Gulf of Maine. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 28:37–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, J. M. 1975. Assembly of species communities. Pp. 342–444 in Diamond, J. M. & Cody, M. L. (eds). Ecology and evolution of communities. Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.Google Scholar
Diamond, J. M. & Marshall, A. G. 1977. Distributional ecology of New Hebridean birds: a species kaleidoscope. Journal of Animal Ecology 46:703–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenberg, J. F. & Thorington, R. W. Jr, 1973. A preliminary analysis of a Neotropical mammal fauna. Biotropica 5:150–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleming, T. H. 1970. Notes on the rodent faunas of two Panamanian forests. Journal of Mammalogy 51:473–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleming, T. H. 1971. Population ecology of three species of Neotropical rodents. Miscellaneous Publications of the Museum of zoology, University of Michigan No. 143, pp. 1–77.Google Scholar
Fleming, T. H. 1972. Aspects of the population dynamics of three species of opossums in the Panama Canal Zone. Journal of Mammalogy 53:619–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gliwicz, J. 1973. A short characteristic of a population of Proechimys semispinosus (Tomes, 1980): a rodent species of the tropical rain forest. Bulletin de L'Academic Polonaise des Sciences, Serie des sciences biologiques, CI II 21:413–418.Google Scholar
Gliwicz, J. 1984. Population dynamics of the spiny rat Proechimys semispinosus on Orchid Island (Panama). Biotropica 16:73–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Handley, C. O.Jr. 1966. Checklist of the mammals of Panama. Pp. 753–795 in Wenzel, R. L. & Tipton, V. J. (eds). Ectoparasites of Panama. Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, IL, USA.Google Scholar
Hanski, I. 1986. Population dynamics of shrews on small islands accord with the equilibrium model. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 28:23–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrell, F. E. 1983. The LOGIST procedure. Pp. 181–202injoyner, S. P. (ed). SUGI supplemental library user's guide. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC, USA.Google Scholar
Leigh, E. G. Jr, Wright, S. J. & Putz, F. E. A null hypothesis concerning the diversity of tropical trees: a test and its implications. Submitted manuscript.Google Scholar
Lomolino, M. V. 1984a. Mammalian island biogeography: effects of area, isolation and vagility. Oecologia (Berlin) 64:376–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lomolino, M. V. 1984b. Immigrant selection, predation, and the distribution of Microtus pennsylvanicus and Marina brevicauda on islands. American Naturalist 123:468–483.Google Scholar
Macarthur, R. H. 1972. Geographical ecology. Harper & Row, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
Macarthur, R. H. & Wilson, E. O. 1967. The theory of island biogeographj. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA.Google Scholar
Pokki, J. 1981. Distribution, demography and dispersal of the field vole, Microtus agrestis (L.), in the Tvarminne archipelago, Finland. Acta zoologica Fennica 164:1–48.Google Scholar
Schoener, T. W. & Adler, G. H. 1991. In press. Greater resolution of distributional complementarities by controlling for habitat affinities: a study with Bahamian lizards and birds. American Naturalist.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoener, T. W. & Schoener, A. 1983. Distribution of vertebrates on some very small islands. I. Occurrence sequences of individual species. Journal of Animal Ecology 52:209–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheppe, W. 1965. Dispersal by swimming in Peromyscus leucopus. Journal of Mammalogy 46:336–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tamarin, R. H. 1978. Dispersal, population regulation, and K-selection in field mice. American Naturalist 112:545–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, S. H. & Duncan, D. B. 1967. Estimation of the probability of an event as a function of several independent variables. Biometrika 54:167–179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wright, S. J. 1979. Competition between insectivorous lizards and birds in central Panama. American Zoologist 19:1145–1156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, S. J. 1986. How isolation affects rates of turnover of species on islands. Oikos 44:331–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar