Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T04:36:34.268Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Beetle pollination and fruit predation of Xanthosoma daguense (Araceae) in an Andean cloud forest in Colombia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 July 2004

Carlos García-Robledo
Affiliation:
Fundación EcoAndina/Wildlife Conservation Society, Colombia Program Apartado Aéreo 25527, Cali, Colombia Present address: Department of Biology, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL 33124-0421, USA. Email: [email protected]
Gustavo Kattan
Affiliation:
Fundación EcoAndina/Wildlife Conservation Society, Colombia Program Apartado Aéreo 25527, Cali, Colombia
Carolina Murcia
Affiliation:
Fundación EcoAndina/Wildlife Conservation Society, Colombia Program Apartado Aéreo 25527, Cali, Colombia
Paulina Quintero-Marín
Affiliation:
Fundación EcoAndina/Wildlife Conservation Society, Colombia Program Apartado Aéreo 25527, Cali, Colombia Departamento de Biología, Universidad del Valle, Apartado Aéreo 25360, Cali, Colombia

Abstract

This study describes a pollination system in a species of Araceae that involves three species of beetle, one of which is also a fruit predator. In a tropical cloud forest in Colombia, inflorescences of Xanthosoma daguense opened at dusk, releasing a sweet scent and raising their temperature 1–3 °C. Soon after, two species of Scarabaeidae (Dynastinae; Cyclocephala gregaria and C. amblyopsis) and one species of Nitidulidae (Macrostola costulata) arrived with pollen. Cyclocephala beetles remained inside the inflorescence for 24 h. The next night, Cyclocephala beetles left the inflorescence after picking up the freshly shed pollen, almost always moving to the nearest inflorescence available. The probability of inflorescence abortion and number of fruits set after the visit of one individual was equivalent for both Cyclocephala species. However, C. gregaria was much more abundant than C. amblyopsis, so it was the most important pollinator. There was a positive relationship between the number of dynastine visits and the number of fruits produced. Besides carrying pollen to the inflorescences, nitidulid beetles had a negative effect on female reproductive success through fruit predation. Nitidulid larvae developed inside the infructescence and preyed on up to 64% of the fruits. However, 8% of inflorescences not visited by dynastines were probably pollinated by nitidulids, because hand-pollination experiments showed that self-pollination was unlikely. Inflorescences potentially pollinated by nitidulids comprised 25% of the fruit crop in the year of our study. This interaction with a fruit predator that is also a potential pollinator resembles brood-site pollination systems in which pollinators prey on part of the fruit set (e.g. Ficus, senita cacti, Yucca), making this system substantially more complex than previously described dynastine-pollinated systems in aroids.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
2004 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)