Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T13:20:11.123Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Predation ecology of large sympatric carnivores as influenced by available wild ungulate prey in a tropical deciduous forest of Central India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 July 2013

Aniruddha Majumder ,
Kalyanasundaram Sankar ,
Qamar Qureshi  and
Santanu Basu
Aniruddha Majumder
Affiliation:
Wildlife Institute of India, P.O. Box # 18, Chandrabani, Dehra Dun-248001, Uttarakhand, India
Kalyanasundaram Sankar*
Affiliation:
Wildlife Institute of India, P.O. Box # 18, Chandrabani, Dehra Dun-248001, Uttarakhand, India
Qamar Qureshi
Affiliation:
Wildlife Institute of India, P.O. Box # 18, Chandrabani, Dehra Dun-248001, Uttarakhand, India
Santanu Basu
Affiliation:
Wildlife Institute of India, P.O. Box # 18, Chandrabani, Dehra Dun-248001, Uttarakhand, India
*
1Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Predation ecology of large sympatric carnivores, tiger, leopard and dhole, as influenced by available wild ungulates, chital, sambar, nilgai, gaur and wild pig, were studied between January 2007 and June 2010 in a tropical deciduous forest of Central India. Both line transect and vehicle transect methods were used to estimate population structure and sex ratios of wild ungulates. The observed adult sex ratio (female:male) was found to be skewed towards females for all ungulates. A total of 123 tiger kills were recorded in the cold season and 162 in the hot season, 32 leopard kills were recorded during the cold season and 48 during the hot season and 32 dhole kills were recorded in the cold season and 55 in the hot season. The age–sex class distribution of each ungulate species in the kill data was compared with the corresponding population age–sex distribution recorded from line transects and vehicle transects. All three large carnivores preferred medium-sized prey species, e.g. chital. A significant difference was observed when comparing different health conditions of prey species predated by the three large carnivores. The observed difference in prey choice as per their body size is a strategy adopted by large carnivores to partition prey resources, thus increasing the potential to avoid intra-guild competition.

Keywords

dholekillsleopardprey choicescatstiger
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Tropical Ecology , Volume 29 , Issue 5 , September 2013 , pp. 417 - 426
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE CITED

ACHARYA, B. B. 2007. The Ecology of the dhole or Asiatic Wild Dog (Cuon alpinus) in Pench Tiger Reserve, Madhya Pradesh. PhD thesis, Saurashtra University, Rajkot, India. 110 pp.Google Scholar
AHRESTANI, F. S. & PRINS, H. H. T. 2011. Age and sex determination of gaur Bos gaurus (Bovidae). Mammalia 75:151–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ANDHERIA, A. P., KARANTH, K. U. & KUMAR, N. S. 2007. Diet and prey profiles of three sympatric large carnivores in Bandipur Tiger Reserve, India. Journal of Zoology 273:169–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ATWOOD, T. C., GESE, E. M. & KUNKEL, K. E. 2007. Comparative patterns of predation by cougars and re-colonizing wolves in Montana's Madison range. Journal of Wildlife Management 71:1098–1106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BISWAS, S. & SANKAR, K. 2002. Prey abundance and food habit of tiger (Panthera tigris tigris) in Pench National Park, Madhya Pradesh, India. Journal of Zoology (London) 256:411–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BUCKLAND, S. T., ANDERSON, D. R., BURNHAM, K. P. & LAAKE, J. L. 1993. Distance sampling: estimating abundance of biological populations. Chapman and Hall, London. 446 pp.Google Scholar
BURNHAM, K. P., ANDERSON, D. R. & LAAKE, J. L. 1980. Estimation of density from line transect sampling of the biological populations. Wildlife Monograph 72:1–202.Google Scholar
CHAMPION, H. G. & SETH, S. K. 1968. A revised survey of the forest types of India. Manager of Publications, Govt.of India Press, New Delhi. 404 pp.Google Scholar
CHAUHAN, N. P. S. 2004. Wild pig. Pp. 203–218 in Sankar, K. & Goyal, S. P. (eds.). Ungulates of India. ENVIS Bulletin: Wildlife and Protected Areas, Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun.Google Scholar
CHILDRESS, M. J. & LUNG, M. A. 2003. Predation risk, gender and the group size effect: does elk vigilance depend upon the behaviour of conspecifics? Animal Behaviour 66:389–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
COHEN, J. E., PIMM, S. L., YODZIS, P. & SALDAÑA, J. 1993. Body sizes of animal predators and animal prey in food webs. Journal of Animal Ecology 62:67–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CURIO, E. 1976. Ethology of predation. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. 250 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DINERSTEIN, E. 1980. An ecological survey of the Royal Karnali Bardia Wildlife Refuge, Nepal. Part III. Ungulate populations. Biological Conservation 16:5–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GITTLEMAN, J. L. 1985. Carnivore body size: ecological and taxonomic correlates. Oecologia 67:540–544.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
GLASSER, J. W. 1979. The role of predation in shaping and maintaining the structure of communities. American Naturalist 113:631–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GRAF, W. & NICHOLS, L. 1966. The Axis deer in Hawaii. Journal of Bombay Natural History Society 63:629–734.Google Scholar
GRIFFITHS, D. 1975. Prey availability and the food of predators. Ecology 56:1209–1214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HIRST, S. M. 1969. Road-strip census techniques for wild ungulates in African woodland. Journal of Wildlife Management 33:40–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HUNTER, S. A. 2011. Resource partitioning between generalist competitors and factors affecting the detectability of scat by dogs. MSc thesis, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama. 52 pp.Google Scholar
HUSSEMAN, J. S., MURRAY, D. L., POWER, G., MACK, C., WENGER, C. R. & QUIGLEY, H. 2003. Assessing differential prey selection patterns between two sympatric large carnivores. Oikos 101:591–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IVLEV, V. S. 1961. Experimental ecology of the feeding of fishes. Yale University, New Haven. 302 pp.Google Scholar
JHALA, Y. V., QURESHI, Q. & GOPAL, R. 2005. Monitoring tigers, co-predators, prey and their habitat. Revised second edition. Technical publication of Project Tiger Directorate, New Delhi and Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun. 40 pp.Google Scholar
JOHNSINGH, A. J. T. 1983. Large mammalian prey-predator in Bandipur. Journal of Bombay Natural History Society 80:1–57.Google Scholar
JOHNSINGH, A. J. T. 1992. Prey selection in three sympatric carnivores in Bandipur. Mammalia 56:517–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KARANTH, K. U. 1993. Predator–prey relationship among large mammals of Nagarhole National Park. PhD thesis, Mangalore University, India.Google Scholar
KARANTH, K. U. & SUNQUIST, M. E. 1992. Population structure, density and biomass of large herbivores in the tropical forests of Nagarahole, India. Journal of Tropical Ecology 8:21–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KARANTH, K. U. & SUNQUIST, M. E. 1995. Prey selection by tiger,leopard and dhole in tropical forests. Journal of Animal Ecology 64:439–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KARANTH, K. U., NICHOLS, J. D., KUMAR, N. S., LINK, W. A. & HINES, J. E. 2004. Tigers and their prey: predicting carnivore densities from prey abundance. Proceedings of the Natural Academy of Sciences USA 101:4854–4858.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
KHAN, J. A., CHELLAM, R., RODGERS, W. A. & JOHNSINGH, A. J. T. 1996. Ungulate densities and biomass in the tropical dry deciduous forests of Gir, Gujarat, India. Journal of Tropical Ecology 12:149–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MAJUMDER, A. 2011. Prey selection, food habits and population structure of sympatric carnivores tiger, leopard and dhole in Pench Tiger Reserve, Madhya Pradesh, India. PhD thesis, Saurashtra University, Rajkot, India. 236 pp.Google Scholar
MAJUMDER, A., SANKAR, K., QURESHI, Q. & BASU, S. 2011a. Food habits and temporal activity patterns of the Golden Jackal Canis aureus and the Jungle Cat Felis chaus in Pench Tiger Reserve, Madhya Pradesh, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa 3:2221–2225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MAJUMDER, A., QURESHI, Q., SANKAR, K., BASU, S. & JHALA, Y. V. 2011b. Occupancy and abundance of dhole (Cuon alpinus) in Pench Landscape of Central India. Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society 108:158–162.Google Scholar
MAJUMDER, A., BASU, S., SANKAR, K., QURESHI, Q., JHALA, Y. V. & GOPAL, R. 2012. Prey selection, food habits and temporal activity patterns of sympatric carnivores in Pench Tiger Reserve, Madhya Pradesh, Central India. Journal of Scientific Transactions in Environment and Technovation 5:110–120.Google Scholar
MAJUMDER, A., SANKAR, K. & QURESHI, Q. 2013. Co-existence patterns of large sympatric carnivores as influenced by their habitat use in a tropical deciduous forest of Central India. Journal of Biological Research-Thessaloniki, 19:89–98.Google Scholar
O’GARA, B. W. & HARRIS, R. B. 1988. Age and condition of deer killed by predators and automobiles. Journal of Wildlife Management 52:316–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PRATER, S. H. 1980. The book of Indian animals. Bombay Natural History Society, Oxford University Press, Bombay. 324 pp.Google Scholar
QURESHI, Q., GOPAL, R., KYATHAM, S., BASU, S., MITRA, A. & JHALA, Y.V. 2006. Evaluating tiger habitat at the Tehsil level. Technical Report 06/001. Project Tiger Directorate, Govt. of India, New Delhi, and Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun. 162 pp.Google Scholar
RABINOWITZ, A. 1989. The density and behavior of large cats in a dry tropical forest mosaic in Huai Kha Khaeng Wildlife Sanctuary, Thailand. Natural History Bulletin Siam Society 37:235–251.Google Scholar
RADLOFF, F. G. T. & DU TOIT, J. T. 2004. Large predators and their prey in a southern African savanna: a predator's size determines its prey size range. Journal of Animal Ecology 73:410–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
RAMESH, T. 2010. Prey selection and food habits of large carnivores (tiger, leopard and dhole) in Mudumalai Tiger Reserve, Western Ghats, India. PhD thesis, Saurastra University, Rajkot, India. 178 pp.Google Scholar
RINEY, T. 1982. Study and management of large mammals. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, New York. 552 pp.Google Scholar
SANKAR, K. 1994. The ecology of three large sympatric herbivores with special reference to reserve management in Sariska Tiger Reserve, Rajasthan. PhD thesis, University of Rajasthan, Jaipur. 190 pp.Google Scholar
SANKAR, K. & JOHNSINGH, A. J. T. 2002. Food habits of tiger (Panthera tigris) and leopard (Panthera pardus) in Sariska Tiger Reserve, Rajasthan, India, as shown by scat analysis. Mammalia 66: 285–289.Google Scholar
SANKAR, K. & ACHARYA, B. 2004. Spotted Deer or Chital. Pp. 171–180 in Sankar, K. & Goyal, S.P. (eds.). Ungulates of India. ENVIS Bulletin: Wildlife and Protected Areas, Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun.Google Scholar
SANKAR, K., QURESHI, Q., PASHA, M. K. S. & AREENDRAN, G. 2001. Ecology of gaur (Bos gaurus) in Pench Tiger Reserve, Madhya Pradesh. Final report, Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun. 124 pp.Google Scholar
SARTAJ, S., GHUMAN, S. S., SANKAR, K. & JHALA, Y. V. 2010. A study of vigilance behaviour of chital (Axis axis). Examining the determinant of individual and group vigilance for chital in Pench Tiger Reserve, India. LAMBERT Academic Publishing, London, UK. 72 pp.Google Scholar
SCHALLER, G. B. 1967. The deer and the tiger. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. 384 pp.Google Scholar
SCHALLER, G. B. & CRAWSHAW, P. G. Jr. 1980. Movement patterns of jaguar. Biotropica 12:161–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SCHEEL, D. 1993. Profitability, encounter rates and prey choice of African lions. Behavioral Ecology 4:90–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SCHOENER, T. W. 1974. Resource partitioning in ecological communities. Science 185:27–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
SEIDENSTICKER, J. 1976. On the ecological separation between tigers and leopards. Biotropica 8:225–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SINCLAIR, A. R. E. 1977. The African buffalo: a study of resource limitation of populations. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago. 355 pp.Google Scholar
SMITH, D. W., MURPHY, K. M. & GUERNSEY, D. S. 1999. Yellowstone Wolf Report: Annual Report 1998. Yellowstone Center for Resources, Yellowstone National Park, Mammoth Hot Springs, Wyoming.Google Scholar
VARMAN, K. S. & SUKUMAR, R. 1995. The line transect method for estimating densities of large mammals in a tropical deciduous forest: an evaluation of models and field experiment. Journal of Bioscience 20:273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WANG, S. W. & MACDONALD, D.W. 2009. Feeding habits and niche partitioning in a predator guild composed of tigers, leopards and dholes in a temperate ecosystem in central Bhutan. Journal of Zoology, London 277:275–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ZAR, J. H. 1984. Biostatistical analysis. Second edition. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. 130 pp.Google Scholar