Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T19:25:21.741Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Directional orientation of migration in an aseasonal explosive-breeding toad from Brazil

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 May 2010

Raquel Rocha Santos ,
Simone Baratto Leonardi ,
Valentina Zaffaroni Caorsi  and
Taran Grant
Raquel Rocha Santos
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Sistemática de Vertebrados, Faculdade de Biociências, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Faculdade de Biociências, Avenida Ipiranga 6681, 90619-900 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
Simone Baratto Leonardi
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Sistemática de Vertebrados, Faculdade de Biociências, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Faculdade de Biociências, Avenida Ipiranga 6681, 90619-900 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
Valentina Zaffaroni Caorsi
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Sistemática de Vertebrados, Faculdade de Biociências, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Faculdade de Biociências, Avenida Ipiranga 6681, 90619-900 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
Taran Grant*
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Sistemática de Vertebrados, Faculdade de Biociências, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Faculdade de Biociências, Avenida Ipiranga 6681, 90619-900 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
*
1Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

The directional orientation of pre- and post-reproductive migration was studied in the Brazilian red-bellied toad Melanophryniscus cambaraensis, a species that forms explosive-breeding aggregations at irregular intervals throughout the entire year. Migrating toads were captured by enclosing the breeding site in dual drift fences with inward- and outward-facing funnel traps. Data were collected over 5 mo and totalled 333 captures. The observed directional orientation was significantly different from expected under a uniform distribution for both pre- and post-reproductive migration, regardless of gender. Males and females did not differ significantly from each other in the orientation of entry or exit, and the directional orientation of pre-reproductive migration was not significantly different from post-reproductive migration. It is suggested that the observed directional bias may be due to a dirt road next to the breeding site that could restrict juvenile dispersal to the adjacent forest.

Keywords

AmphibiaAnuraBufonidaeecologyMelanophryniscus cambaraensismovementSouth America
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Tropical Ecology , Volume 26 , Issue 4 , July 2010 , pp. 415 - 421
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITERATURE CITED

ACHAVAL, F. & OLMOS, A. 2007. Anfíbios y reptiles del Uruguay. Facultad de Ciências, Montevideo. 160 pp.Google Scholar
ALTIG, R. & MCDIARMID, R. W. 1999. Body plan. Diversity: familial and generic characterizations. Pp. 295–337 in McDiarmid, R. W. & Altig, R. (eds.). Tadpoles. The biology of anuran larvae. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
BACKES, A., FELIPE, L. & VIOLA, M. G. 2005. Produção de serapilheira em Floresta Ombrófila Mista, em São Francisco de Paula, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. Acta Botânica Brasileira 19:155–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BECKER, C. G., FONSECA, C. R., HADDAD, C. F. B., BATISTA, R. F. & PRADO, P. I. 2007. Habitat split and the global decline of amphibians. Science 318:1775–1777.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
BERGIN, T. M. 1991. A comparison of goodness-of-fit tests for analysis of nest orientation in western kingbirds (Tyrannus verticalis). Condor 93:164–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BONATTI, C., MARCZWSKI, M., REBELATO, G. S., SILVEIRA, C. F., CAMPELLO, F. D., RODRIGUES, G., GUERRA, T. & HARTZ, S. M. 2006. Trilhas da Floresta Nacional de São Francisco de Paula, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil: Mapeamento, Análise e Estudo da Capacidade de Carga Turística. Revista Brasileira de Biociências 4:15–26.Google Scholar
BOTH, C., KAEFER, I. L., SANTOS, T. G. & CECHIN, S. T. Z. 2008. An austral anuran assemblage in the Neotropics: seasonal occurrence correlated with photoperiod. Journal of Natural History 42:205–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BURIOL, G. A., ESTEFANEL, V., GRACIOLI, M. S. A., CHAGAS, A. C. & FONTINELI, D. C. 2009. Climatic zoning of conditions for the development of the larva of the mosquito that transmits the dengue fever virus in the State of Rio Grande do Sul. Electronic Journal of Communication, Information & Innovation in Health 3:24–36.Google Scholar
CADE, B. S. & RICHARDS, J. D. 2005. User manual for Blossom statistical software. U.S. Department of Interior, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia, USA. Available from http://www.fort.usgs.gov/products/publications/pub_abstract.asp?PubID=21536Google Scholar
DODD, C. K. & CADE, B. S. 1998. Movement patterns and the conservation of amphibians breeding in small, temporary wetlands. Conservation Biology 12:331–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FERNER, J. W. 2007. A review of marking and individual recognition techniques for amphibians and reptiles. Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles, Salt Lake City. 72 pp.Google Scholar
GARCIA, P. C. A. & VINCIPROVA, G. 2003. Anfíbios. Pp. 147–164 in Fontana, C. S., Bencke, G. A. & Reis, R. E. (eds.). Livro vermelho da fauna ameaçada de extinção no Rio Grande do Sul. EDIPUCRS, Porto Alegre.Google Scholar
HADDAD, C. F. B. & PRADO, C. P. A. 2005. Reproductive modes in frogs and their unexpected diversity in the Atlantic forest of Brazil. Bioscience 55:207–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
JEHLE, R. & ARNTZEN, J. W. 2000. Post-breeding migrations of newts (Triturus cristatus and Triturus marmoratus) with contrasting ecological requirements. Journal of Zoology, London 251:297–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KWET, A. & DI-BERNARDO, M. 1999. Anfíbios, amphibien, amphibians. EDIPUCRS, Porto Alegre. 107 pp.Google Scholar
LEMCKERT, F. L. 2004. Variations in anuran movements and habitat use: implications for conservation. Applied Herpetology 1:165–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MALMGREN, J. C. 2002. How does a newt find its way from a pond? Migration patterns after breeding and metamorphosis in great crested newts (Triturus cristatus) and smooth newts (T. vulgaris). Herpetological Journal 12:29–35.Google Scholar
MARTY, P., ANGELIBERT, S., GIANI, N. & JOLY, P. 2005. Directionality of pre and post-breeding migrations of a marbled newt population (Triturus marmoratus): implications for buffer zone management. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 15:215–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
RAO, J. S. 1976. Some tests based on arc-lengths for the circle. Sankhya, The Indian Journal of Statistics, Series B 38:329–338.Google Scholar
RITTENHOUSE, T. A. G. & SEMLITSCH, R. D. 2006. Grasslands as movement barriers for a forest-associated salamander: migration behavior of adult and juvenile salamanders at a distinct habitat edge. Biological Conservation 131:14–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
RUSSELL, A. P., BAUER, A. M. & JOHNSON, M. K. 2005. Migration of amphibians and reptiles: an overview of patterns and orientation mechanisms in relation to life history strategies. Pp. 151–203 in Elewa, M. T. (ed.). Migration of organisms. Springer, Berlin.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SEMLITSCH, R. D. 2008. Differentiating migration and dispersal processes for pond-breeding amphibians. Journal of Wildlife Management 72:260–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SINSCH, U. 1988. Seasonal changes in the migratory behavior of the toad Bufo bufo: direction and magnitude of movements. Oecologia 76:390–398.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
SONEGO, R. C., BACKES, A. & SOUZA, A. F. 2007. Descrição da estrutura de uma Floresta Ombrófila Mista, RS, Brasil, utilizando estimadores não-paramétricos de riqueza e rarefão de amostras. Acta Botânica Brasileira 21:943–955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
TODD, B. D., LUHRING, T. M., ROTHERMEL, B. B. & GIBBONS, J. W. 2009. Effects of forest removal on amphibian migrations: implications for habitat and landscape connectivity. Journal of Applied Ecology 46:554–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VASCONCELOS, D. & CALHOUN, A. J. K. 2004. Movement patterns of adult and juvenile Rana sylvatica (LeConte) and Ambystoma maculatum (Shaw) in three restored seasonal pools in Maine. Journal of Herpetology 38:551–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WALSTON, L. J. & MULLIN, S. J. 2008. Variation in amount of surrounding forest habitat influences the initial orientation of juvenile amphibians emigrating from breeding ponds. Canadian Journal of Zoology 86:141–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WELLS, K. D. 1977. The social behavior of anuran amphibians. Animal Behavior 25:666–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WELLS, K. D. 2007. The ecology and behavior of amphibians. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago. 1400 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar