Hostname: page-component-cc8bf7c57-llmch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-11T23:06:06.511Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Eighteenth-Century Origins of the Musical Canon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

William Weber
William Weber*
Affiliation:
California state University, Long Beach
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Joseph Kerman has suggested a distinction crucial in defining the meaning of ‘canon’ in musical culture: repertory, he argues, was simply the performance of old works; canon, by contrast, is their reverence on a critical plane and in a literary context. The distinction is a fertile one, for it challenges us to define when works were not just offered by convention, but when they functioned as models for musical taste critically and aesthetically. The distinction can be extremely fruitful in tracing the early history of the canon – its origins in repertory and gradual evolution into its modern form. What I would like to show here is how repertories grew up originally without true status as canon; before canon there was repertory, and that is where the whole tradition began. In inquiring just where the modern practice of performing old music regularly came about we can look into some of the most fundamental social and intellectual bases upon which the tradition was established.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the Royal Musical Association , Volume 114 , Issue 1 , 1989 , pp. 6 - 17
Copyright
Copyright © 1989 Royal Musical Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Kerman, Joseph, ‘A Few Canonic Variations’, Critical Inquiry, 10 (1983), 107–26; repr. in Canons, ed Robert von Hallberg (Chicago, 1984), 177–95.Google Scholar

2 Among my studies of the emerging musical canon are ‘The Contemporaneity of Eighteenth-Century Musical Taste’, Musical Quarterly, 70 (1984), 75–94, ‘La Musique anctenne in the Ancien Régime’, Journal of Modern History, 58 (1984), 58–88, ‘Classical Repertory in Nineteenth-Century Orchestral Concerts’, The Orchestra, ed. Joan Peyser (New York, 1986), 361–86, ‘Wagner, Wagnerism, and Musical Idealism’, Wagnerism in European Culture and Politics, ed. William Weber and David C. Large (Ithaca, 1984), 28–71, and ‘Mentalité, tradition et les origines du “canon” musical au XVIIIe siècle’, forthcoming in Annates, E. S CGoogle Scholar

3 Kerman, ‘A Few Canonic Variations’, 112Google Scholar

4 The most important recent works on canon in the other arts likewise see indigenous roots in each field, see Haskell, Francis, Rediscoveries in Art Some Aspects of Taste, Fashion and Collecting in Nineteenth-Century England and France (Oxford, 1976), and Frank Kermode, The Classic. Images of Permanence and Change (New York, 1975)Google Scholar

5 Lovell, Percy, ‘“Ancient” Music in Eighteenth-Century England’, Music and Letters, 60 (1979), 401–15.Google Scholar

6 Die Musik in Geschichte und Gegenwart, 17 vols. (Kassel, 1949–51), i, cols. 603–7. I am indebted to Jerome Roche on this matter.Google Scholar

7 Robert L. and Norma W. Weaver, A Chronology of Music in the Florentine Theater, 1590–1750 (Detroit, 1978), 129.Google Scholar

8 See the various editions of The Catch Club or Merry Companion between c.1725 and 1800.Google Scholar

9 ‘Allegri, Gregorio’, The New Grove Dictionary, i, 266–7; Julius Amann, Allegrt's Miserere und die Aufführungspraxis in der Sixtina (Regensburg, 1935).Google Scholar

10 ‘Cavalli, Francesco’, The New Grove Dictionary, iv, 24–34. I am indebted to Michael Talbot on this matter.Google Scholar

11 Blackburn, Bonnie, ‘Josquin's Chansons: Ignored and Lost Sources’, Journal of the American Musicological Soctety, 29 (1976), 30–76, Robert Stevenson, ‘Josquin in the Music of Spain and Portugal’, Proceedings of the International Josquin Festival, ed. Edward Lowinsky (Oxford, 1976). 217–46; Vanhulst, Henri, ‘Un succès de l'édition musicale. Le Septièsme livre des chansons à quatre parties, 1560–1661/3’, Revue beige de mustcologie, 32–3 (1978–9), 97–120.Google Scholar

12 Wolff, Christoph, Der stile antico in der Musik J. S. Bachs Studien zu Bachs Spätwerk (Wiesbaden, 1968); Karl Gustav Feilerer, Der Palestrinastil und seine Bedeutung in der vokalen Kirchenmusik des 18. Jahrhunderts (Augsburg, 1929); Day, Thomas, ‘Echoes of Palestrina's Missa ad fugam in the Eighteenth Century’, Journal of the American Mustcological Society, 24 (1971), 462–9; Newcomb, Anthony, ‘When the Stile antico was Young’, paper read to the American Musicological Society Convention, November 1986.Google Scholar

13 See, for example, the inclusion of a piece for clavecin by Froberger in a recueil dated London, 1702 (British Library, Add. MS 39659). I am indebted to Bruce Gustavson for this information, see his French Harpsichord Music of the Seventeenth Century (Ann Arbor, 1979).Google Scholar

14 Edwards, Owain, “The Response to Corelli's Music in Eighteenth-Century England', Studia musicologica Norvegica, 2 (1976), 51–96, Dennis Libby, ‘Interrelationships in Corelli’, Journal of the American Musicological Society, 26 (1973), 263–4; John Hawkins, A General History of the Science and Practice of Music (repr. New York, 1963), ii, 676. See, for example, Two Concertos being the 1st and 11th solos of the late Arcangelo Corelli .. as they are made into concerto's by Mr Obadiah Shuttlesworth (London, c.1725).Google Scholar

15 Morehen, John, ‘The Sources of English Church Music, c.1617-c.1644’ (Ph.D. dissertation, University of Cambridge, 1969).Google Scholar

16 Ibid, 244–88 The Barnard is in Royal College of Music, MSS 1045–51.Google Scholar

17 First Book of Selected Church Music (London, 1641), Preface, 2.Google Scholar

18 Music and the Reformation in England (London, 1967), 368. Brian Crosby has likewise found that the copying done at Durham Cathedral in the 1670s and 1680s excluded all but a few of the verse anthems such as were so popular in the 1630s.Google Scholar

19 Crosby, Brian, A Catalogue of Durham Cathedral Manuscripts (Oxford, 1986); ‘A Seventeenth-Century Durham Inventory’, The Musical Times, 119 (1980), 167–70; ‘Durham Cathedral's Liturgical Manuscripts, c.1620–40’, Durham University Journal, 66 (1973), 40–51. I am indebted to Brian Crosby for his help.Google Scholar

20 Tomkins, Thomas, Musica Sacra or Musick, dedicated to the Honour and Service of God, and to the use of Cathedrals and other churches of England and Especially of the Chapell Royal of King Charles the First (London, 1668).Google Scholar

21 For related glorification of old music by Catholics, see Brett, Philip, ‘Edward Paston (1552–1630): A Norfolk Gentleman and his Music Collection’, Transactions of the Cambridge Bibliographical Society, 4 (1964), 51–72.Google Scholar

22 See Bedford, Arthur, The Great Abuse of Music (London, 1711), 183, discussing ‘such who learn our present Songs may be as far to seek in our ancient divine musick, as if they knew nothing at all’. The collection was John Playford'sGoogle Scholar

23 Turnbull, Edward, ‘Thomas Tudway and the Harleian Collection’, Journal of the American Musicological Society, 8 (1955), 203–7; Hogwood, Christopher, “Thomas Tudway's History of Music', Music in Eighteenth-Century England A Festschrift to Charles Cudworth, ed. Christopher Hogwood and Richard Luckett (Cambridge, 1984), 19–17.Google Scholar

24 Tudway to Wanley, 20 September 1719, Portland Loan 29/257. This series of letters in the Portland Loan deserves the close attention of scholars, see, for example, the letters on Tudway's supposed dismissal from the university in 1706 in 29/159. I will be publishing a brief discussion of these letters in a forthcoming issue of the British Library Journal devoted to the final acquisition of the Portland Loan.Google Scholar

25 Tudway to Wanley, 4 June 1716, Harl. 3782, f 58.Google Scholar

26 Programmes of the Academy are to be found in the Leeds Public Library, the Bibliothèque Nationale, Paris, the British Library and the collection of Mr Christopher Hogwood; a set of scores from the first programme of the Academy are in the library of Durham Cathedral, and the Minutes of the Academy, 1726–31, is in British Library, Add. MS 11732 See discussion of its history in H. Diack Johnstone, ‘Maurice Greene: His Life and Work’ (D.Phil, dissertation, University of Oxford, 1967), i, 96–110; and Colin Timms, ‘Steffani and the Academy of Ancient Music’, The Musical Times, 119 (1978), 127–30Google Scholar

27 The programmes are widely available in Words of the concerts of Antient Music at Tottenham Square Rooms for the Year 1776 and so on. See James E. Matthew, The Antient Concerts, 1776–1848', Proceedings of the Musical Association, 33(1906–7), 55–79. I plan to publish a detailed analysis of the first 15 years of the programme at this series in my book in progress, The Musical Canon in the Eighteenth and Nineteenth CenturiesGoogle Scholar

28 Richard Luckett,’ “Or rather our Musical Shakspeare:” Charles Burney's Henry Purcell’, Music in Eighteenth-Century England, 59–77.Google Scholar

29 Pearce, Ernest Harold, History of the Corporation of the Sons of the Clergy (London, 1904); papers of the Corporation and the Festival, London Record Office, Northampton Row; Nicholas Cox, Bridgmg the Gap A History of the Sons of the Clergy (Oxford, 1978).Google Scholar