Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T12:12:59.685Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Suffix sat

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2011

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Miscellaneous Communications
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Asiatic Society 1912

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 729 note 1 See also JRAS. 1906, pp. 484–90, 716–22; my Aitareya Āraṇyaha, p. 203.

page 729 note 2 ZDMG. lxv, 313–15. 3 v, 4. 52–4.

page 729 note 3 Sanskrit Grammar, § 1108.

page 729 note 4 Summarized neatly by Whitney, loc. eit., to whose account there is really nothing to add.

page 730 note 1 ii, 1. 13; Hi, 3. 44.

page 731 note 1 For the references see St. Petersburg Dictionary, s.vv.; Speyer, , Sanskrit Syntax, § 309Google Scholar.

page 731 note 2 xi, 5. 6. 9.

page 731 note 3 Sāyujya is used with much the same sense.

page 732 note 1 xii, 2328 (a late passage).

page 732 note 2 vii, 8687.

page 733 note 1 See the St. Petersburg Dictionaries, s. v. sātmī, and ProfessorSpeyer's, own quotations, ZDMG. lxv, 314Google Scholar.

page 733 note 2 Cf. also Speyer, , Vedische und Sanskrit Syntax, p. 46Google Scholar, n. 1.

page 733 note 3 xi, 80.

page 733 note 4 v, 23. 8.

page 733 note 5 iv, 1. 10. 3.

page 733 note 6 xvi, 7.

page 733 note 7 ii, 5. 2.

page 733 note 8 ii, 7. 7.

page 733 note 9 v, 37.

page 733 note 10 vi, 6. 5. 10. Eggeling, , SBE. xli, 259Google Scholar, renders “burn thou to ashes”.

page 733 note 11 St. Petersburg Dict. s.v. Maṣmaṣā; Bloomfield, , SBE. xlii, 455Google Scholar.

page 734 note 1 Cf. Wackernagel, , Altind. Gramm. i, 18Google Scholar; Macdonell, , Vedic Grammar, p. 431Google Scholar.

page 734 note 2 See St. Petersburg Dict. s.v.

page 734 note 3 Possibly the fact that the s is not liable to lingualization is to be connected with the fact that sat in sat kṛ is not liable to change as not being an ordinary suffix.