Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T23:33:38.477Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Proceedings of the Arabic and Islamic sections of the 35th international congress of Asian and North African studies (ICANAS), Part one. Edited by Kinga Dévényi and Tamás Iványi. (The Arabist, Budapest studies in Arabic, 19–20). pp. v, 272. Budapest, Eötvös Loránd University Chair for Arabic Studies & Csoma de Kőrös Society Section of Islamic Studies, 1998.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 September 2009

François de Blois
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society , Volume 10 , Issue 2 , July 2000 , pp. 239 - 241
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Asiatic Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 PSAS xvi (1986), p. 18Google Scholar. I would wish to qualify one of the statements in this passage: Although the (lost) history of Thābit b. Sinān aṣ-Ṣābi’ is clearly one of the principal sources used by Miskawayh and Ibn al-’Athīr for this period, I do not now believe that the work published as Thābīt's ’Akbāru l-qarāmiṭah has anything to do with him and have expressed in print the opinion that the latter is “a clumsy forgery knocked together out of extracts from Ibn al-’Athīr” see El 2, art. Ṣābi’. The El article has presumably been overlooked by Hajnal, who quotes repeatedly from pseudo-Thābit.