Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T14:04:17.100Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

XVI. The Factitious Genealogies of the Mongol Rulers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2011

Extract

When the various tribes of Mongols and Kalmuks were definitely converted to Lamaism in the sixteenth century it was not unnatural that the Lamaist monks, who formed their only literary class, should have tried to affiliate their famous heroes and their princely families to the old royal stock of Tibet, which had become for them a sacred land. Hence we find the two Mongol chronicles, one known as the “Altan Topchi” and the other generally quoted from the name of its author as Ssanang Setzen, and the Kalmuk legend derived by Pallas from the Tibetan work called the “Bodimer,” all concurring in a pedigree for the Mongol royal race which traces them first to the early Tibetan kings, and through them up to the alleged Indian ruler Olana Ergükdeksen, and through him again up to Sakiamuni Buddha himself. This pedigree was probably the invention of the author of the “Altan Topchi.”

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Asiatic Society 1908

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 662 note 1 Klaproth reminds us that the Chinese dictionary called Wan sing t'ung pu reports the legend of Burtechino and gives this genealogy in epitome, and also tells us that Borjig was the family name of Chinghiz Khan. (Ascr. Polyglotta, 263.)