No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 March 2011
The Vākāṭaka Dynasty, of which the very name and existence had been utterly forgotten for many centuries, was brought to the knowledge of students of ancient Indian history by the publication in 1836 of a copper-plate grant from the Central Provinces. Since that date a few more inscriptions on stone or copper have been discovered at various times and places, and the little known about the dynasty is derived solely from those records. No extant coin can be assigned to the Vākāṭaka princes, who must have used as currency the monetary issues of other powers. We are ignorant of the derivation of the name Vākāṭaka, and are unable to say whether the kings were indigenous or of foreign descent. Nor do we know for certain the locality in which the dynasty took its rise. It is not mentioned in literature, although it seems to be the subject of an obscure allusion in the Purāṇas, which contain in the section dealing with the dynasties of Vidiśā, etc., the passage translated by Mr. Pargiter from his eclectic text, as follows:—
“Hear also the future kings of Vidiśā. Bhogin, son of the Naga king Seṣa, will be king, conqueror of his enemies' cities, a king who will exalt the Nāga family. Saducandra, and Candrāṁśa who will be a second Nakhavant, then Dhanadharman, and Vaṅgara is remembered as the fourth. Then Bhūtinanda will reign in the Vaidiśa kingdom.
page 318 note 1 Dynasties of the Kali Age, Oxford, 1913, p. 72.Google Scholar
page 319 note 1 Obsolete editions are not cited.
page 326 note 1 For details and dates of the history of the Imperial Guptas, see Early History of India, in either the second or the third edition.
page 329 note 1 The Districts of Berār were re-arranged in 1905. Īlichpur, which used to be a separate District, was then merged in Amraoti (Amarāvatī).
page 329 note 2 The references are collected by Collins, , p. 28.Google Scholar
page 330 note 1 Mysore and Coorg from the Inscriptions, 1909, p. 3Google Scholar; Mysore Gazetteer, i, 289, 1897.Google Scholar
page 331 note 1 A.S.R., xvii, pp. 68–70, 1884.Google Scholar
page 331 note 2 All the little information available about the Traikūṭakas has been collected and published by Rapson, Catalogue, of the Coins of the Andhra Dynasty, etc., in the British Museum, 1908. See especially sections 42, 132, 134.
page 332 note 1 Bombay Gazetteer, vol. i, pt. i, p. 7, 1896.Google Scholar
page 334 note 1 A.S.R., vol. xxi, pp. 95–8Google Scholar, pls. xxv–vii, 1885. Plate xxvi gives slight indications of the nature of the sculptured ornaments, but no statue is figured. It is much to be desired that a good set of photographs of the temple and its sculptures should be obtained and published to illustrate the art of the reign of Samudragupta.
page 334 note 2 H.F.A., p. 162.Google Scholar