Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T20:38:08.180Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Multicultural China in the Early Middle Ages. By Sanping Chen . pp. xi, 279. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania University Press, 2012.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2014

Stephen G. Haw*
Affiliation:
Independent scholar, [email protected]

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Asiatic Society 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Exactly who was “Chinese” and who not is also a debatable question.

2 Chinese Hanhua 漢化

3 白居易

4 拓跋

5

6 Mackerras, C. (ed. and trans.), The Uighur Empire According to the T'ang Dynastic Histories: a study in Sino-Uighur relations 744 – 840 (Canberra: Australian National University Press, 1972), p. 63 Google Scholar.

7 新唐書.

8 安祿山

9 哥舒翰

10 胡. In the case of An Lushan, it certainly means Sogdian, but, at this period, it more generally referred to Central Asians of Eastern Iranian or Indo-Iranic type.

11 Xu, Liu 劉昫, et al. (eds), Jiu Tang shu 舊唐書, 16 vols. (Beijing: Zhonghua Shuju 中華書局, 1975), vol. 10, juan 卷 104, p. 3213 Google Scholar.

12 The Old History of the Tang Dynasty (Jiu Tang shu) and the Comprehensive Mirror for Aid in Government (Zizhi tongjian 資治通鉴).