No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 March 2011
page 712 note 1 His original reading was given in JASB, 32, 1863. 151. He corrected aśa-thuva into aya thuva, with a suggestion that there might be ayaṁ, in the same volume, p. 172. He afterwards adopted ayaṁ; but his reproduction shews aē. He read bhratarēhi and pratithavitō in his later version (ASI, 2. 125); but his drawing shews bhatarēhi and pratithavatō.
page 713 note 1 Judged by his use of the form gihilēna, instead of sihilēna, Mr. Thomas did the same. But he made certain deviations from what the reproduction really shews.
page 715 note 1 The verse, and another following it, stand in print as if they were prose.
page 715 note 2 The verse stands in print as if it were prose. The editors, however, have marked it as a verse in a note on page 708. And they have there suggested that for kshantum there should be read khantum, for the sake of the metre. That, however, does not now seem necessary.