Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-17T02:14:54.688Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Evolution of Historical Linguistics: Sir Ralph Turner Memorial Lecture 9th May, 1985

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2011

R. H. Robins
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It would, of course, be possible in the case of a man such as Sir Ralph Turner to devote an entire lecture to an extended obituary. Several full obituaries have already been published, but a brief notice of some salient features of his life and career are still, perhaps, in place in a Memorial Lecture in his honour. Ralph Lilley Turner was born in 1888 and educated at The Perse School, Cambridge, and at Christ's College, Cambridge. He entered the Indian Education Service and during the First World War he served with the Gurkha Rifles. After the war he was Professor of Indian Linguistics at Benares University, until he was appointed to the Chair of Sanskrit in London. In 1937 he became Director of the School of Oriental Studies, soon to become the School of Oriental and African Studies, until 1957. He was knighted in 1950, and from 1957 he spent an active retirement working almost until his death in 1983 on the final stages of the supplements to his life's work, the Comparative Dictionary of the Indo-Aryan Languages.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society , Volume 118 , Issue 1 , January 1986 , pp. 5 - 20
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Asiatic Society 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Allen, W. S. (1953). Relationship in comparative linguistics. TPS: 108.Google Scholar
Benfey, T. (1869). Geschichte der Sprachwissenschaft und orientalischen Philologie in Deutschland. Munich, Cotta.Google Scholar
Boas, F. (1929). Classification of American Indian languages. Lang. 5: 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bopp, F. (1816). Über das Conjugationssystem der Sanskritsprache in Vergleichung mit jenem der griechischen, lateinischen, persischen, und germanischen Sprache. Frankfurt, Andreäische Buchhandlung.Google Scholar
Bopp, F. (1833). Vergleichende Grammatik des Sanskrit, Zend, Griechischen, Lateinischen, Litauischen, Gotischen, und Deutschen. Berlin, Dümmler.Google Scholar
Borst, A. (1957–1963). Der Turmbau von Babel. Stuttgart, Hiersemann.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. The Hague, Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, A. M. (1975). Language classification in the nineteenth century. In Sebeok, T. A. (ed.), Current trends in linguistics 13: 607–716. The Hague, Mouton.Google Scholar
Diderot, D. and d'Alembert, J. le R. (1772). Encyclopédie 9. Geneva, Cramer.Google Scholar
Duponceau, P. S. (1825). Essai de solution du probléme philologique proposé en l'année 1823 par la Commission de l'Institut royal de France. Ms.Google Scholar
Duponceau, P. S. (1838). Mémoire sur le systéme grammaticale des langues de quelques nations indiennes de l'Amérique du Nord. Paris, Pihan de la Forest.Google Scholar
Goropius, Becanus (1569). Origines Antwerpianae. Antwerp, Plantinus.Google Scholar
Greenberg, J. H. (1960). A quantitative approach to the morphological typology of languages. IJAL 26: 178–194.Google Scholar
Guitarte, G. L. (1984). La dimensión imperial del español en la obra de Aldrete: sobre la aparición del español de América en la linguística hispanica. HL 11: 129–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guthrie, M. (1948). The classification of the Bantu languages. London, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Haas, M. R. (1966). The prehistory of languages. The Hague, Mouton.Google Scholar
Haas, M. R. (1969). Grammar or lexicon? The American Indian side of the question from Duponceau to Powell. IJAL 35: 239–255.Google Scholar
Hockett, C. F. (1965). Sound change. Lang. 41: 185–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humboldt, W. von (1949). Über die Verschiedenheit des menschlichen Sprachbaues. Darmstadt, Claassen and Roether.Google Scholar
Jespersen, O. (1922). Language. London, Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Kaulen, F. (1861). Die Sprachverwirrung zu Babel. Mainz, Kirchheim.Google Scholar
Lehmann, W. P. (ed.) (1967). A reader in nineteenth century historical Indo-European linguistics. Bloomington, Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Meillet, A. (1937). Introduction à l'étude comparative des langues indo-européennes. Paris, Librairie Hachette.Google Scholar
Meillet, A. (1948). Linguistique historique et linguistique générale. Paris, Honoré Champion.Google Scholar
Pertz, G. H. (ed.) (1879). Monumenta Germaniae historica 24. Hannover, Hahn.Google Scholar
Pott, A. F. (1833). Etymologische Forschungen l. Lemgo, Meyer.Google Scholar
Pott, A. F. (1863). Anti-Kaulen oder mythische Vorstellungen vom Ursprunge der Völker und Sprachen. Lemgo, Meyer.Google Scholar
Powell, J. W. (1891). Indian linguistic families north of Mexico. Seventh Annual Report of the Bureau of Ethnology. Washington, Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Rask, R. (1818). Undersøgelse om det gamle nordiske eller islandske sprogs oprindelse. Hjelmslev, L. (ed.), Ausgewählte Abhandlungen 1 (1932). Copenhagen, Levin and Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Robins, R. H. (1979). A short history of linguistics. London, Longman.Google Scholar
Rowe, J. H. (1974). Sixteenth and seventeenth century grammars. In Hymes, Dell(ed.), Studies in the history of linguistics, 361–379. Bloomington, Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Sarmiento, R. (ed.) (1984). Gramètica de la lengua caslellana 1771. Madrid, Editora nacional.Google Scholar
Saussure, F. de (1916). Cours de linguistique générale. Lausanne, Payot.Google Scholar
Scaliger, J. J. (1610). Diatriba de Europaeorum linguis. Opuscula varia, 119–122. Paris, Beys.Google Scholar
Schlegel, A. W. von (1818). Observations sur la langue et la littérature provençales. Paris, Librairie grecque latine allemande.Google Scholar
Schlegel, F. von (1808). Über die Sprache und Weisheit der Indier. Heidelberg, Mohr and Zimmer.Google Scholar
Schleicher, A. (1863). Die darwinsche Theorie und die Sprachwissenschaft, Weimar, Böhlau.Google Scholar
Schleicher, A. (1876). Compendium der Vergleichenden Grammatik der indogermanischen Sprachen. Weimar, Böhlau.Google Scholar
Schott, A. (ed.) (1603). Hispaniae illustratae 2. Frankfurt, Marnius.Google Scholar
Schrader, O. (1907). Sprachvergleichung und Urgeschichte. Jena, Costenoble.Google Scholar
Sievers, E. (1876). Grundzüge der Lautphysiologie: zur Einführung in das Studium der Lautlehre der indogermanischen Sprachen. Leipzig, Breitkopf and Hirtel.Google Scholar
Stiernhielm, G. (1671). De linguarum origine Praefatio. D. N. Jesu Christi SS. Evangeliaab Ulfila Gothorum translata. Stockholm, Wankif.Google Scholar
Thomsen, V. (1927). Geschichte der Sprachwissenschaft bis zum Ausgang des 19 Jahrhunderts. Halle, Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Thumb, A. (1958). Handbuch des Sanskrit 1. Heidelberg, Winter.Google Scholar
Tovar, C. L. de (1984). José Celestine Mutis (1732–1808) and the report on American languages ordered by Charles III of Spain for Catherine the Great of Russia. HL 11: 213–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Transactions of the Philological Society (1978). The Neogrammarians.Google Scholar
Turgot, A. (1844). Oeuvres 2. Paris, Guillaumin.Google Scholar
Turner, R. L. (1931). A comparative and etymological dictionary of the Nepali language. London, Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Turner, R. L. (1966–1984). A comparative dictionary of the Indo-Aryan languages. London, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Turner, R. L. (1975). Collected papers 1912–1973. London, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Uhlig, G. (ed.) (1883). Grammatici Graeci l. Leipzig, Teubner.Google Scholar
Vendryes, J. (1921). Le langage. Paris, La renaissance du livre.Google Scholar
Webb, J. (1669). An historical essay endeavouring a probability that the language of the Empire of China is the primitive language. London, Blagrave.Google Scholar
Wilkins, J. (1668). Essay towards a real character and a philosophical language. London, Gellibrand.Google Scholar
Whitney, W. D. (1874). Oriental and linguistic studies 1. New York, Scribner.Google Scholar
Wright, J. C. (1984). Obituary, Sir Ralph Lilley Turner. BSOAS 47, 540–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar