No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 March 2011
page 505 note 3 J.R.A.S. 1907, p. 951 ff.Google Scholar
page 505 note 4 J.R.A.S. 1908, p. 169 ff.Google Scholar
page 508 note 1 Preller, : “Griechische Mythologie,” 2nd ed., vol. i, p. 187.Google Scholar
page 509 note 1 v. Dr. Barnett's translation of the Antagaḍa-Dasāo (O. T. F., vol. xvii), pp. 67–82Google Scholar, for the legend, and pp. 13–15 for a description of Kaṇhe (Krishṇa) Vāsudeva.
page 510 note 1 Op. cit., p. 81.Google Scholar
page 511 note 1 The following note by Dr. McLean, of Christ's College, Cambridge, is of interest:—“The name ‘Christ’ does not appear to have been used by the early Syriac-speaking Christians. The N. T. has always : you will find that Brockelmann's Lexicon does not mention at all, and that Payne Smith's only authorities for it are a Bodleian MS. (Or. lix, of which the age may be ascertained from his catalogue) and two Syriac lexicographers, who give it as = On the other hand, ‘Christian’ () appears in 1 Pet. iv, 16, and in early Syriac books, and some of its derivatives (such as ) are fairly common. But my impression is that the more usual words for ‘Christian’ are and . So that the evidence is not quite clear: only must have been very rarely used, if at all.”Dr. Mills says: “The nearest to your matter is the Kalašiyākāh of Neryosangh at Y. 9. 75 (Sp.). Ner. seems to have seen a resemblance between Kaesāni and Christos, so he coins Kalašiyākāh to imitate ecclesia. The term Christos does not occur, so far as I remember, in the texts with which I have to do.”
page 513 note 1 Select works of S. Ephraem the Syrian, translated by Morris, J. B., Rhythm VI, p. 37Google Scholar (Eph. Opp. Syr.-Lat., iii, 420 f. Professor Burkitt has very kindly revised Mr. Morris' renderings for me).
page 513 note 2 Wilson, , Vishṇu Purāna, v, c. 3, p. 502.Google Scholar
page 514 note 1 Select works of S. Ephraem the Syrian, tr. by Morris.
page 514 note 2 Wilson, , Vishṇu Purāna, v, c. 3, p. 542.Google Scholar
page 514 note 3 Select works of S. Ephraem the Syrian, tr. by Morris, , p. 6.Google Scholar
page 514 note 4 Ibid., Rhythm I, p. 6Google Scholar. (Opp. Syr.-Lat., iii, 4006. Professor Burkitt says that Gabriel is called the Watcher in the Nestorian Epiphany Service (Rituale Armenorum, p. 327Google Scholar). Cf. Daniel, iv, 10.)Google Scholar
page 514 note 5 “The followers of Basilides,” says Clement, “celebrate the day of the Baptism as a feast, . They say it happened in the ISth year of Tiberius Caesar, on the 15th day of the month Tybi, but some of them hold it on the 11th of the same month” (Strom, , i, c. 21, p. 147 S.)Google Scholar. These Gnostics held that the Christ descended on the man Jesus at the Baptism; and this naturally suggested the month of Tybi, ‘the first month of growth’ in the Egyptian calendar, as an appropriate season for the festival. They avoided any connection -with the great heathen festivals of the Egyptians, which were celebrated in the month preceding.
page 515 note 1 ‘December,’ Syr. ‘Kanun’: Kanun i = December, Kanun ii = January. S. Ephraem gives no indication which is meant; his words would equally well suit January 6th.
page 515 note 2 Select works of S. Ephraem, etc., Rhythm III, pp. 20, 21Google Scholar. Cf. Rhythm IV, p. 27: “The sun gave longer light, and foreshadowed the mystery by the degrees which it had gone up.” “The increase of light at the time of the Nativity is noticed by S. Gregory Naz., S. Augustine, and S. Leo,” says Morris.Google Scholar
page 517 note 1 J.R.A.S., 1908, p. 171.Google Scholar
page 517 note 2 Hopkins, , “Religions of India,” p. 57.Google Scholar
page 517 note 3 Ibid., p. 51.
page 517 note 4 Ibid., p. 54.
page 517 note 5 Ibid., p. 50.
page 517 note 6 Ibid., p. 52.
page 518 note 1 Levi, S.: “Theâtre Indien,” p. 299.Google Scholar
page 518 note 2 Hopkins, : “Religions of India,” p. 32.Google Scholar
page 519 note 1 Ibid., p. 51.
page 520 note 1 J.R.A.S., 1908, p. 174.Google Scholar
page 520 note 2 J.R.A.S., 1908, p. 172.Google Scholar
page 521 note 1 Hopkins, : “Religions of India,” p. 430.Google Scholar