Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T14:17:53.042Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Inventory of Tibetan Sound Laws

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2011

NATHAN W. HILL
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Scholars of Indo-European historical linguistics have long found it convenient to refer to well known sound changes by the name of the researcher who first noticed the correspondences the sound change accounts for. Because of the proven utility of such named sound laws in Indo-European linguistics, the explicit listing and naming of sound laws in the Tibeto-Burman family could be expected to bring similar benefits.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society , Volume 21 , Issue 4 , October 2011 , pp. 441 - 457
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Asiatic Society 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ba Shin, U (1962). The Lokahteikpan. Rangoon: The Burma Historical Commission.Google Scholar
Baxter, William H. (1992). A Handbook of Old Chinese Phonology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Benedict, Paul (1939). “Semantic Differentiation in Indo-Chinese.” Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies 4.3–4: pp. 213–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benedict, Paul K. (1972). Sino-Tibetan: A Conspectus. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Beyer, Stephen (1992). The Classical Tibetan Language. Albany: State University of New York Press; reprinted Delhi, Sri Satguru Publications, 1993.Google Scholar
Bodman, Nicolas C. (1980). “Proto – Chinese and Sino – Tibet Data towards establishing the nature of the relationship.” Contributions to Historical Linguistics: Issues and Methods. van Coetsem, Frans and Waugh, Linda, (eds.). Leiden: Brill. pp. 34–199.Google Scholar
Bray, John (2008). “Missionaries, officials and the making of the 1826 Dictionary of the Bhotanta, or Boutan Language.” Zentralasiatische Studien 37: pp. 33–75.Google Scholar
Chang, Betty Shefts (1971). “The Tibetan Causative phonology.” Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology 42: pp. 623–765.Google Scholar
Coblin, Weldon South (1974). “An early Tibetan word for horse.” Journal of the American Oriental Society 94: pp. 124–125.Google Scholar
Coblin, Weldon South (1976). “Notes on Tibetan Verbal Morphology.” T'oung Pao 52: pp. 45–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dempsey, Jakob (2001). “Remarks on the vowel system of old Burmese.” Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 24.2: pp. 205–234. Errata 26.1 183.Google Scholar
Eimer, Helmut (1987). “Eine alttibetische Perfektbildung.” Indo-Iranian Journal 30: pp. 213–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucaux, Philippe Édouard (1858). Grammaire de la langue tibétaine. Paris: L'imprimerie impériale.Google Scholar
Gong, Huang-cherng 龔 煌 城 (1977). “古 藏 文 的 y 及 其 相 關 問 題 guzangwen de y ji qixiangguan wenti [Ancient Tibetan y and related questions].” Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology, Academia Sinica 48.2: pp. 205–228. (reprinted in) Gong Hwang-cherng 龔 煌 城 (2002). 漢 藏 語 硏 究 論 文 集 Hanzangyu yanjiulun wenji / Collected Papers on Sino-Tibetan Linguistics. Taipei: 中 央 硏 究 院 語 言 學 硏 究 所 籌 備 處 Zhongyang yanjiuyuan yuyanxue yanjiusuo choubeichu: pp. 379–399.Google Scholar
Gong, Hwang-cherng (1980). “A Comparative Study of the Chinese, Tibetan, and Burmese Vowel Systems.” Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology 51.3: pp. 455–490. (reprinted in:) 漢 藏 語 硏 究 論 文 集 Hanzangyu yanjiulun wenji / Collected Papers on Sino-Tibetan Linguistics. Taipei: 中 央 硏 究 院 語 言 學 硏 究 所 籌 備 處 Zhongyang yanjiuyuan yuyanxue yanjiusuo choubeichu, 2002: pp. 1–30.Google Scholar
Gong, Hwang-cherng (1995). “The System of Finals in Proto-Sino-Tibetan”. The Ancestry of the Chinese Language. William S. Y. Wang, (ed.) (Journal of Chinese linguistics. Monograph series 8) Berkeley: Project on Linguistic Analysis, University of California: pp. 41–92. (reprinted in:)漢 藏 語 硏 究 論 文 集 Hanzangyu yanjiulun wenji / Collected Papers on Sino-Tibetan Linguistics. Taipei: 中 央 硏 究 院 語 言 學 硏 究 所 籌 備 處 Zhong yang yan jiu yuan yuyanxue yanjiusuo choubeichu, 2002: pp. 79–124.Google Scholar
Hahn, Michael (1999). “Blags und Verwandtes (Miscellanea etymologica tibetica, VI).” Studia Tibetica et Mongolica (Festschrift Manfred Taube). (eds.) Helmut, Eimer et al. (Indica et Tibetica 34). Swistall-Odendorft: Indica et Tibetica Verlag. pp. 123–125.Google Scholar
Hill, Nathan W. (2005). “Once more on the letter.” Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 28.2: pp. 111–141.Google Scholar
Hill, Nathan W. (2006). “Tibetan vwa ‘fox’ and the sound change Tibeto-Burman *wa -> Old Tibetan o.” Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 29.2: pp. 75–90.Google Scholar
Hill, Nathan W. (2007) “Aspirate and non-aspirate voiceless consonants in Old Tibetan.” 語 言 暨 語 言 學 / Language and Linguistics 8.2: pp. 471–493.Google Scholar
Hill, Nathan W. (2009a). “Tibetan < ḥ-> as a plain initial and its place in Old Tibetan Phonology.” Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 32.1: pp. 115–140.Google Scholar
Hill, Nathan W. (2009b). “Review of Handbook of Proto-Tibeto-Burman: System and Philosophy of Sino-Tibetan Reconstruction. By James A. Matisoff. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2003”. 語 言 暨 語 言 學 Language and Linguistics 10.1: pp. 173–195.Google Scholar
Hill, Nathan W. (2010). A Lexicon of Tibetan Verb Stems as Reported by the Grammatical Tradition. Munich: Bayerische Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Hill, Nathan W. (forthcoming). “The difference between Tibetan <gy> and <g.y> and ramifications for Old Tibetan phonology.” Medieval Tibeto-Burman Languages IV. Leiden: Brill.+and++and+ramifications+for+Old+Tibetan+phonology.”+Medieval+Tibeto-Burman+Languages+IV.+Leiden:+Brill.>Google Scholar
Houghton, Bernard (1898). “Outlines of Tibeto-Burman Linguistic Palæontology.” Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society: pp. 23–55.Google Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume (2001). “Les préfixes nominaux d- /g- en tibétain classique.” Quinzième journée de linguistique - Asie orientale, EHESS, Paris, 08–06-2001.Google Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume (2003). “Un cas de dissimilation labiale en chinois archaique: la racine ‘couvrir, renverser’ et son equivalent en Tibetain.” Cahiers de Linguistique Asie Orientale 32.1: pp.123–130.Google Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume 向 柏 霖 (2008). 嘉 絨 語 研 究 Jiarongyu yanjiu. [Study of the Rgyalrong Language]. 民 族 出 版 社 Minzu Chubanshe.Google Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume (2009). “Tibetan wa-zur and Laufer's law.” Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 32.1: pp. 141–144.Google Scholar
Jacques, Guillaume and Chen, Zhen (2010). Une verison rgyalrong de l’épopée de Gesar. (Senri Ethnological Reports 93). Osaka: National Museum of Ethnology.Google Scholar
Jäschke, Heinrich August (1881). Tibetan English Dictionary. London: Unger Brothers.Google Scholar
Jin, Peng 金 鵬 (1958). 藏 語 拉 薩 日 喀 則 昌 都 話 的 比 較 硏 究 Zangyu Lasa, Rikeze, Changdu hua di bijiao yanjiu. [Tibetan language, A comparative study of the Lha sa, Gźis ka rtse, and Chab mdo dialects.] Beijing: 科 学 出 版 社 Kexue chubanshe.Google Scholar
de Jong, Jan Willem (1973). “Tibetan blag-pa and blags-pa.” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 36.2: pp. 309–312.Google Scholar
Judson, Adoniram (1893). Judson's Burmese-English dictionary. Rangoon: Printed by the superintendent, Government printing, Burma.Google Scholar
Karlgren, Bernhard (1964). Grammata Serica Recensa. Stockholm: Museum of Far Eastern Antiquities.Google Scholar
von Koerber, H. N. (1935). Morphology of the Tibetan language. Los Angeles: Suttonhouse.Google Scholar
Kojima, Noriyuki 小 島 憲 之 et al. (1994). 日 本 書 紀 Nihon shoki. Tokyo: 小 学 館 Shōgakkan.Google Scholar
Kjellin, Olle (1975). “How to explain the ‘tones’ in Tibetan.” ア ジ ア • ア フ リ カ 語 の 計 数 研 究 Ajia Afurika go no keisūkenkyū / Computational Analyses of Asian & African Languages 2: pp. 37–52.Google Scholar
Laufer, Berthold (1898/1899). “Ueber das va zur. Ein Beitrag zur Phonetik der tibetischen Sprache.” Wiener Zeitschrift für die Kunde des Morgenlandes 12: pp. 289–307; 13: pp. 95–109, 199–226; reprinted in Kleinere Schriften von Berthold Laufer. (ed.) Hartmut Walravens. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner Verlag, 1976: pp. 61–122.Google Scholar
Laufer, Berthold (1914). “Bird divination among the Tibetans (notes on document Pelliot no 3530, with a study of Tibetan phonology of the ninth century).” T'oung Pao 15: pp. 1–110; reprinted in Hartmut Walravens & Lokesh Chandra (eds.), Sino-Tibetan Studies, vol 2. New Delhi: Rakesh Goel. pp. 354–463.Google Scholar
Li, Fang-Kuei (1933). “Certain Phonetic Influences of the Tibetan Prefixes upon the Root Initials.” Bulletin of the Institute of History and Philology 6.2: pp. 135–157.Google Scholar
Li, Fang-Kuei (1959). “Tibetan Glo-ba-’dring.” Studia Serica Bemhard Karlgren dedicate. Egerod, Søren and Glahn, Else (eds.) Copenhagen: Ejnar Munksgaard, pp. 55–59.Google Scholar
Fang-Kuei, Li (1976). “Sino-Tai”. Computational Analysis of Asian and African Languages 3: pp. 39–48.Google Scholar
Luce, G. H. (1985). Phases of Pre-Pagán Burma: Languages and History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Matisoff, James (2003). Handbook of Proto-Tibeto-Burman. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Maung, Wun (1975). “Development of the Burmese language in the medieval period.” 大 阪 外 国 語 大 学 学 報 Ōsaka gaikokugo daigaku gakuhō 36: pp. 63–119.Google Scholar
Miller, Roy Andrew (1956). “Segmental diachronic phonology of a Ladakh (Tibetan) dialect.” Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morganländischen Gesellschaft 106: pp. 345–362.Google Scholar
Miller, Roy Andrew (1966). “Early evidence for vowel harmony in Tibetan.” Language 42: pp. 252–277.Google Scholar
Miller, Roy Andrew (1974). “Sino-Tibetan: Inspection of a Conspectus.” Journal of the American Oriental Society 94.2: pp. 195–209.Google Scholar
Miller, Roy Andrew (1993). Prolegomena to the First Two Tibetan Grammatical Treatises. (Wiener Studien zur Tibetologie und Buddhismuskunde 30.) Vienna: Arbeitskreis für Tibetische und Buddhistische Studien Universität Wien.Google Scholar
Mimaki, Katsumi (1990). “ ウ パ ロ サ ル (dBus pa blo gsal) の 『 新 旧 語 彙 集 』 (brDa gsar rñiṅ gi rnam par dbye ba) 校 訂 本 初 稿 Dbus pa blo gsal no ‘Shin Kyuu Goi Shu’ –Kōteibon Shokō / A Fourteenth-Century Tibetan Lexicographical Work, the brDa gsar rñiṅ gi rnam par dbye ba by dBus pa blo gsal.” ア ジ ア の 言 語 と – 般 言 語 学: 西 田 龍 雄 教 授 還 暦 記 念 論 集 Ajia no gengo to ippan gengogaku: Nishida Tatsuo kyōju kanreki kinen ronshū / Asian Languages and General Linguistics, Festschrift for Prof. Tatsuo Nishida on the occasion of his 60th birthday. Tokyo: 三 省 堂 Sanseidō: pp. 17–54.Google Scholar
Mimaki, Katsumi (1992). “Index to two brda gsar rnying treatises: the works of dbus pa blo gsal and lCang skya Rol pa'i rdo rje.” 成 田 山 仏 敎 硏 究 所 紀 要 Naritasan Bukkyō Kenkyūjo kiyō 15: pp. 479–503.Google Scholar
Nishi, Yoshio (1999). Four Papers on Burmese: Toward the history of Burmese (the Myanmar language). Tokyo: Institute for the study of languages and cultures of Asia and Africa, Tokyo University of Foreign Studies.Google Scholar
Nishida, Tatsuo 西 田 竜 雄 (1972). 緬 甸 館 譯 語 の 研 究: ビ ル マ 言 語 學 序 說 Mendenkan yakugo no kenkyū: Biruma gengogaku josetsu / A Study of the Burmese-Chinese vocabulary, Mien-tien-kuan i-yu.Google Scholar
Norman, Jerry (1994) “Pharyngealization in Early Chinese.” Journal of the American Oriental Society 114.3: pp. 397–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pan, Wuyun 潘 悟 雲 (2000). 漢 語 歷 史 音 韻 學 Hanyu lishi yinyunxue. Shanghai: 上 海 敎 育 出 版 社 Shanghai jiaoyu chubanshe.Google Scholar
Pulleyblank, Edwin G. (1962). “Consonantal system of Old Chinese. Part II.” Asia Major (New Series) 9.2: pp. 206–265.Google Scholar
Pulleyblank, Edwin G. (1979). “The Chinese Cyclical Signs as Phonograms.” Journal of the American Oriental Society 99.1: pp. 24–38.Google Scholar
Róna-Tas, András (1992). “Reconstructing Old Tibetan.” Ihara, Shoren and Yamaguchi, Zuiho (eds.) Tibetan Studies: Proceedings of the 5th Seminar of the International Association for Tibetan Studies, Narita 1989. Narita: Naritasan Shinshoji. Vol 2. pp. 697–704.Google Scholar
Sagart, Laurent (1988). “Nord et sud dans la langue et L’écriture des Shang”. T'oung Pao 74.4–5: pp. 249–254.Google Scholar
Sagart, Laurent (1999). The Roots of Old Chinese. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Sagart, Laurent (2003). “The vocabulary of cereal cultivation and the phylogeny of East Asian languages.” Bulletin of the Indo-Pacific Prehistory Association 23.1: pp. 127–136.Google Scholar
Sagart, Laurent (2006). “Handbook of Proto-Tibeto-Burman: System and philosophy of Sino-Tibeto-Burman reconstruction. By James A. Matisoff.” Diachronica 23:1: pp. 206–223.Google Scholar
Sagart, Laurent and Baxter, William H. (2009). “Reconstructing Old Chinese uvulars in the Baxter-Sagart system (Version 0.99).” Cahiers de Linguistique - Asie Orientale 38.2: pp. 221–244.Google Scholar
Schiefner, Anton (1852). “Tibetischen Studien.” Mélanges asiatiques tirés du Bulletin de l'Académie impériale des sciences de St.-Pétersboug 1: pp. 324–394.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Isaak Jakob (1839). Grammatik der tibetischen Sprache. St. Petersburg: Kaiserlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Schroeter, Frederic Christian Gotthelf (1826). A Dictionary of the Bhotanta or Boutan Language. Serampore.Google Scholar
Schuessler, Axel (2003). “What Are Cognates and What Are Variants in Chinese Word Families?” 古 今 通 塞: 漢 語 的 歷 史 與 發 展 Gu jin tong sai: Hanyu de lishi yu fazhan / Historical development of Chinese language. He Da'an 何 大 安, ed. Taipei: 中 央 硏 究 院 語 言 學 硏 究 所 籌 備 處 Zhongyang yanjiu yuan yuyanxue yanjiusuo choubeichu: pp. 225–248.Google Scholar
Schuessler, Axel (2007). ABC Etymological Dictionary of Old Chinese. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press.Google Scholar
Shafer, Robert (1950/51). “Studies in the morphology of the Bodic verbs.” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 13.3 and 4: pp. 702–724 and 1017–1031.Google Scholar
Simon, Walter (1929). “Tibetisch-Chinesische Wortgleichungen, ein Versuch.” Mitteilungen des Seminars für Orientalische Sprachen an der Friedrich Wilhelms-Universität zu Berlin 32: pp. 157–228.Google Scholar
Simon, Walter (1964). “Tibetan Lexicography and Etymological Research.” Transactions of the Philological Society 63.1: pp. 85–107.Google Scholar
Sprigg, Richard Keith (1972). “A Polysystemic Approach, in Proto-Tibetan Reconstruction, to Tone and Syllable-Initial Consonant Clusters.” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 35.3: pp. 546–587.Google Scholar
Sun, Jackson T. S. (1993). ‘A Historical-Comparative study of the Tani (Mirish) Branch in Tibeto-Burman', PhD dissertation, University of California at Berkeley.Google Scholar
Tauscher, Helmut (2008). Catalogue of the Gondhla Proto-Kanjur. Vienna: Arbeitskreis für Tibetische und Buddhistische Studien Universität Wien.Google Scholar
Ulving, Tor (1972). “Tibetan vowel harmony revisited.” T'oung Pao 58: pp. 203–217.Google Scholar
Uray, Géza (1968). “A Chronological Problem in the Old Tibetan Chronicle.” Acta orientalia Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 11: pp. 268–269.Google Scholar
Walleser, Max (1926). Zur Aussprache des Sanskrit und Tibetischen. (Materialien zur Kunde des Buddhismus 11). Heidelberg: O. Harrassowitz.Google Scholar