Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T19:42:23.443Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tenure and Satisfaction as Indicators of Attachment: A Note

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2017

A. E. Luloff ,
Louis E. Swanson Jr.  and
Rex H. Warland
A. E. Luloff
Affiliation:
Institute of Natural and Environmental Resources, University of New Hampshire
Louis E. Swanson Jr.
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology, University of Kentucky
Rex H. Warland
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, The Pennsylvania State University
Get access

Abstract

The role of community attachments in decision-making models of migration is evaluated. Findings of a block model analysis (with multiple partials) are reported with data from a longitudinal study. Findings indicate that attachments to community only partially explain willingness to move.

Type
Contributed Papers
Information
Journal of the Northeastern Agricultural Economics Council , Volume 11 , Issue 2 , Fall 1982 , pp. 53 - 60
Copyright
Copyright © Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The data upon which this publication is based were collected pursuant to Contract No. NIH-NICHD-72-2743 with the National Institutes of Child Health and Human Development. This research was partially funded by the Pennsylvania State University Program of the 1972 Rural Development Act. Published with the approval of the Director of the New Hampshire Agricultural Experiment Station as Scientific Contribution No. 1083. We gratefully acknowledge the assistance of Ken Wilkinson and Dan Moore and many other reviewers. An earlier version of the paper was presented at the 1980 Rural Sociological Society meetings.

References

Bach, Robert L. and Smith, J. 1977. “Community Satisfaction, Expectations of Moving, and Migration.” Demography 14 (May): 147–168.Google Scholar
Berry, Brian J.L. and Kasarda, John D. 1977. Contemporary Urban Ecology. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc.Google Scholar
Blackwood, Larry G. and Carpenter, Edwin H. 1978. “The Importance of Anti-Urbanism in Determining of Residential Preferences and Migration Patterns.” Rural Sociology 43 (Spring): 31–47.Google Scholar
Coleman, James S. 1975. “Methods and Results in the IEA Studies of Effects of School on Learning.” Review of Educational Research 45 (Summer): 355–86.Google Scholar
Coleman, James S. 1976. “Regression Analysis for the Comparison of School and Home Effects.” Social Science Research 5 (March): 1–20.Google Scholar
DeJong, Gordon F. 1977. “Residential Preferences and Migration.” Demography 14 (May): 169–178.Google Scholar
DeJong, Gordon F. and Bush, Trudy L. 1974. “Residential Preference Patterns and Population Redistribution.” pp. 170–313 in Zelinsky, et al., Population Change and Redistribution in Nonmetropolitan Pennsylvania, 1940–1970. University Park, PA: Population Issues Research Office, The Pennsylvania State University.Google Scholar
DeJong, Gordon F. and Sell, Ralph R. 1973. “Residential Preferences and Migration Behavior.” Report submitted to the Center for Population Research, U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare.Google Scholar
Goldscheider, Calvin. 1971. Population, Modernization, and Social Structure. Boston: Little, Brown and Co.Google Scholar
Heaton, Tim, Fredrickson, Carl, Fuguitt, Glenn V. and Zuiches, James. 1979. “Residential Preferences, Community Satisfaction, and the Intention to Move.” Demography 16 (November): 565–573.Google Scholar
Kasarda, John D. and Janowitz, Morris. 1974. “Community Attachments in Mass Society.” American Sociological Review 39 (June): 328–339.Google Scholar
Lansing, J. B., and Mueller, E. 1967. The Geographic Mobility of Labor. Ann Arbor, Michigan: Survey Research Center.Google Scholar
Ritchey, R. Neal. 1976. “Explanations of Migration.” pp. 363–340 in Inkeles, , et al. (eds.), Annual Review of Sociology. Palo Alto, California: Annual Reviews, Inc.Google Scholar
Sell, Ralph R. 1977. “Household and Neighborhood Factors in Migration: A Motivational Decision-making Analysis.” University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation.Google Scholar
Paul, Shaw R. 1975. Migration Theory and Fact. Philadelphia, PA: Regional Science Research Institute.Google Scholar
Speare, A. Jr. 1974. “Residential Satisfaction as an Intervening Variable in Residential Mobility.” Demography 11 (May): 173–188.Google Scholar
Speare, Alden Jr., Goldstein, Sidney, and Frey, William H. 1975. Residential Mobility, Migration, and Metropolitan Change. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Pub. Co.Google Scholar
Sullivan, John L. 1974. “Multiple Indicators: Some Criteria of Selection.” pp. 243–269 in Blalock, (ed.), Measurement in the Sciences: Theories and Strategies. Chicago: Aldine Press.Google Scholar
Suttles, Gerald D. 1972. The Social Construction of Communities. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Swanson, Louis E., Luloff, A. E., Warland, H. 1979a. “Factors Influencing Willingness to Move: An Examination of Nonmetropolitan Residents.” Rural Sociology 44 (Winter): 719–735.Google Scholar
Swanson, Louis Ε., Luloff, A. Ε., Warland, H. 1979b. “Retirement and Willingness to Move: A Note.” Paper presented at the annual meetings of the Northeast Agricultural Economics Council, June, Newark, DE.Google Scholar
Wolpert, Julian. 1965. “Behavioral Aspects of the Decision to Migrate.” Papers of the Regional Science Association 15: 159–169.Google Scholar
Zelinsky, Wilbur, et al. 1974. Population Change and Redistribution in Nonmetropolitan Pennsylvania, 1940–1970. University Park, PA: Population Issues Research Office, The Pennsylvania State University.Google Scholar
Zelinsky, Wilbur. 1978. “Is Nonmetropolitan America Being Repopulated? The Evidence from Pennsylvania's Minor Civil Divisions.” Demography 15 (February): 13–39.Google Scholar