Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-f46jp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-12T13:52:02.690Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rural Community Development: A Community State Approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2017

Jon M. Conrad  and
Barry C. Field
Jon M. Conrad
Affiliation:
Department of Food and Resource Economics, University of Massachusetts, Amherst
Barry C. Field
Affiliation:
Department of Food and Resource Economics, University of Massachusetts, Amherst
Get access

Extract

Research in rural community development is being pursued in a number of different directions. One of these is the identification and analysis of economic development alternatives facing rural communities. A second is the clarification and study of the preferences that rural communities may have with respect to these alternatives. The purpose of this paper is to provide a conceptual framework for integrating these two thrusts in rural development research.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Northeastern Agricultural Economics Council , Volume 5 , Issue 1 , April 1976 , pp. 1 - 16
Copyright
Copyright © Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

This paper is an offshoot of a larger study supported under Title V of the Rural Development Act of 1972. The authors wish to express their thanks to the Experiment Station, University of Massachusetts, Amherst for its support, and Geoff Allen and Cleve Willis for their valuable comments on an earlier draft.

References

1. Allbee, R. N. and Storey, D. A., “Elements in a Decision Framework for the Allocation of Coastal Land and Water Resources with Illustration for a Coastal Community,” Publication No. 36, Water Resources Research Center, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, 1973.Google Scholar
2. Arrow, K. J., “A Difficulty in the Concept of Social Welfare,” Journal of Political Economy 58 (1950): 328–346.Google Scholar
3. Arrow, K. J., Social Choice and Individual Values, New York, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 1951.Google Scholar
4. Bish, R. L., The Public Economy of Metropolitan Areas, Chicago, Markham, 1971.Google Scholar
5. Black, D., “On the Rationale of Group Decision Making,” Journal of Political Economy 56 (1948): 23–34.Google Scholar
6. Bromley, D. W., Schmid, A. A., and Lord, W. B., “Public Water Resource Project Planning and Evaluation: Impacts, Incidence, and Institutions,” Working Paper #1, Center for Resource Policy Studies and Programs, University of Wisconsin, Madison, September, 1971.Google Scholar
7. Dahl, R., A Preface to Democratic Theory, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press, 1956.Google Scholar
8. Hildreth, R. J. and Schaller, W. N., “Community Development in the 1970's,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 54 (1972): 764–773.Google Scholar
9. Inada, K., “A Note on the Simple Majority Decision Rule,” Econometrica 32 (1964): 525–531.Google Scholar
10. Leontief, W., “Environmental Repercussions and the Economic Structure: An Input-Output Approach,” The Review of Economics and Statistics, 52 (1970): 262–271.Google Scholar
11. Sen, A. K., “A Possibility Theorem on Majority Decisions,” Econometrica 34 (1966): 491–499.Google Scholar
12. Tiebout, C. M., “A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures,” Journal of Political Economy 64 (1956): 416–424.Google Scholar
13. Tiebout, C. M., The Community Economic Base Study, Committee for Economic Development, Supplementary Paper No. 16, December, 1962.Google Scholar
14. Ward, B., “Majority Voting and Alternative Forms of Public Enterprises,” in The Second Conference in Urban Expenditure, Margolis, J., Editor, 1966.Google Scholar