Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T13:42:48.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The use of Fourier analysis as a tool for Oblada melanura (Linnaeus, 1758) stock unit separation in the south central Mediterranean Sea

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 July 2017

Manel Barhoumi ,
Widien Khoufi ,
Sawssen Kalai ,
Anissa Ouerhani ,
Sabrine Essayed ,
Ghada Zaier ,
Héla Jaziri ,
Sadok Ben Meriem  and
Rafika Fehri-Bedoui
Manel Barhoumi
Affiliation:
University of Tunis El Manar, Faculty of Sciences of Tunis (FST), Physiology and Aquatic Environment (UR/13ES, 35), Campus F. Hached, 2092 Tunis, Tunisia
Widien Khoufi
Affiliation:
National Institute of Sciences and Marine Technologies (INSTM), Port La Goulette, 2060 Tunis, Tunisia
Sawssen Kalai
Affiliation:
National Institute of Sciences and Marine Technologies (INSTM), Port La Goulette, 2060 Tunis, Tunisia
Anissa Ouerhani
Affiliation:
University of Tunis El Manar, Faculty of Sciences of Tunis (FST), Physiology and Aquatic Environment (UR/13ES, 35), Campus F. Hached, 2092 Tunis, Tunisia
Sabrine Essayed
Affiliation:
University of Tunis El Manar, Faculty of Sciences of Tunis (FST), Physiology and Aquatic Environment (UR/13ES, 35), Campus F. Hached, 2092 Tunis, Tunisia
Ghada Zaier
Affiliation:
University of Tunis El Manar, Faculty of Sciences of Tunis (FST), Physiology and Aquatic Environment (UR/13ES, 35), Campus F. Hached, 2092 Tunis, Tunisia
Héla Jaziri
Affiliation:
National Institute of Sciences and Marine Technologies (INSTM), Port La Goulette, 2060 Tunis, Tunisia
Sadok Ben Meriem
Affiliation:
National Institute of Sciences and Marine Technologies (INSTM), Port La Goulette, 2060 Tunis, Tunisia
Rafika Fehri-Bedoui*
Affiliation:
University of Tunis El Manar, Faculty of Sciences of Tunis (FST), Physiology and Aquatic Environment (UR/13ES, 35), Campus F. Hached, 2092 Tunis, Tunisia
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: R. Fehri-Bedoui, University of Tunis El Manar, Faculty of Sciences of Tunis (FST), Physiology and Aquatic Environment (UR/13ES, 35), Campus F. Hached, 2092 Tunis, Tunisia email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

For the first time, an otolith shape analysis was used to investigate the stocks of saddled bream (Oblada melanura, Linnaeus, 1758) in three fishing zones along the Tunisian coast (Bizerte, Kélibia and Sayada). Otolith shape analysis was used on 30 otoliths for each site, sampled during the spawning period. Using elliptic Fourier descriptors (EFD) the quantization of the shape otolith was investigated by SHAPE and multivariate statistical procedures. Considering the environmental and the genotypic aspects, the preliminary results of the otolith shape analysis showed dissimilarity in silhouette of otoliths of saddled bream stocks collected from the north (Bizerte), the north-east (Kélibia) and the east (Sayada) of the Tunisian coast. Therefore, these three groups could be considered as three sub-units of the Tunisian stock, which should be managed separately.

Keywords

Oblada melanuraotolith shapeelliptic Fourier descriptors (EFD)stockTunisia
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 98 , Issue 7 , November 2018 , pp. 1725 - 1732
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Antolović, N., Kožul, V., Safner, R., Glavić, N. and Bolotin, J. (2011) Influence of temperature, salinity and body mass on the metabolism of the saddled bream Oblada melanura. In Milan, P. (ed) Proceedings of 46th Croatian and 6th International Symposium on Agriculture, Section 6: Fisheries, Game Management and Beekeeping, University of Zagreb and Faculty of Agriculture, Opatija, 14–18 February 2011. Opatija: University of Zagreb and Faculty of Agriculture, pp. 782–786.Google Scholar
Avigliano, E., Jawad, L.A. and Volpedo Alejandra, V. (2015) Assessment of the morphometry of saccular otoliths as a tool to identify triplefin species (Tripterygiidae). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 96, 1167–1180.Google Scholar
Avigliano, E., Martinez, C.F.R. and Volpedo, A.V. (2014) Combined use of otolith microchemistry and morphometry as indicators of the habitat of the silverside (Odontesthes bonariensis) in a freshwater-estuarine environment. Fisheries Research 149, 55–60.Google Scholar
Bas, C. (2009) The Mediterranean: a synoptic overview. Contributions to Science 5, 25–39.Google Scholar
Begg, G.A. and Brown, R.W. (2000) Stock identification of haddock Melanogrammus aeglefinus on Georges Bank based on otolith shape analysis. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 129, 935–945.Google Scholar
Begg, G.A., Overholtz, W.J. and Munroe, N.J. (2001) The use of internal otolith morphometrics for identification of haddock (Melanogrammus aeglefinus) stocks on Georges Bank. Fishery Bulletin 99, 1.Google Scholar
Begg, G.A. and Waldman, J.R. (1999) An holistic approach to fish stock identification. Fisheries Research 43, 35–44.Google Scholar
Ben Slimen, H., Guerbej, H., Ben Othmen, A., Ould Brahim, I., Blel, H., Chatti, N., El Abed, A. and Said, K. (2004) Genetic differentiation between populations of gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata) along the Tunisian coast. Cybium 28, 45–50.Google Scholar
Bethoux, J.P. (1979) Budgets of the Mediterranean Sea – their dependence on the local climate and on the characteristics of the Atlantic waters. Oceanologica Acta 2, 157–163.Google Scholar
Booke, H. E. (1981) The conundrum of the stock concept – are nature and nurture definable in fishery science? Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 38, 1479–1480.Google Scholar
Borsa, P., Naciri, M., Bahri, L., Chikhi, L., Garcia De Leon, F.J., Kotoulas, G. and Bonhomme, F. (1997) Zoogéographie infra-spécifique de la mer Méditerranée : analyse des données génétiques populationnelles sur seize espèces Atlanto-Méditerranéennes (poissons et vertébrés). Vie Milieu 47, 295–305.Google Scholar
Brophy, D. and Danilowicz, B.S. (2002) Tracing populations of Atlantic herring (Clupea harengus L.) in the Irish and Celtic Seas using otolith microstructure. ICES Journal of Marine Science: Journal du Conseil 59, 1305–1313.Google Scholar
Burke, N., Brophy, D. and King, P.A. (2008) Otolith shape analysis: its application for discriminating between stocks of Irish Sea and Celtic Sea herring (Clupea harengus) in the Irish Sea. ICES Journal of Marine Science 65, 1670–1675.Google Scholar
Cadrin, S.X. and Friedland, K. D. (1999) The utility of image processing techniques for morphometrics analysis and stock identification. Fisheries Research 43, 129–139.Google Scholar
Cadrin, S.X., Kerr, L.A. and Mariani, S. (2013) Stock identification methods: applications in fishery science. 2nd edition. New York, NY: Elsevier Academic Press.Google Scholar
Calarza, J.A. (2007) Patterns and causes of population subdivision in the marine environment. PhD thesis. University of Hull, Hull, UK.Google Scholar
Calò, A., Di Franco, A., De Benedetto, G.E., Pennetta, A., Pérez-Ruzafa, Á. and García-Charton, J.A. (2016a) Propagule dispersal and larval patch cohesiveness in a Mediterranean coastal fish. Marine Ecology Progress Series 544, 213–224.Google Scholar
Calò, A., Muñoz, I., Pérez-Ruzafa, Á., Vergara-Chen, C. and García-Charton, J.A. (2016b) Spatial genetic structure in the saddled sea bream (Oblada melanura Linnaeus, 1758) suggests multi-scaled patterns of connectivity between protected and unprotected areas in the Western Mediterranean Sea. Fisheries Research 176, 30–38.Google Scholar
Campana, S.E. and Casselman, J.M. (1993) Stock discrimination using otolith shape analysis. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 50, 1062–1083.Google Scholar
Cañás, L., Stransky, C., Schlickeisen, J., Sampedro, M.P. and Farinã, A.C. (2012) Use of the otolith shape analysis in stock identification of anglerfish (Lophius piscatorius) in the Northeast Atlantic. ICES Journal of Marine Science 69, 250–256.Google Scholar
Cardinale, M., Doering-Arjes, P., Kastowsky, M. and Mosegaard, H. (2004) Effects of sex, stock, and environment on the shape of known-age Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) otoliths. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 61, 158–167.Google Scholar
Carvalho, J.R. and Hauser, L. (1994) Molecular genetics and the stock concept in fisheries. Journal of Fish Biology 4, 326–350.Google Scholar
Cheilari, A. and Rätz, H.J. (2009) Review of possible stock units of European hake, red mullet and deep-water pink shrimp in the Mediterranean Sea by means of trends in survey abundance. Scientific, Technical and Economic Committee for Fisheries (STECF), Working paper SG/ECA/RST/MED, 9 pp. https://stecf.jrc.ec.europa.eu/c/document_library/get_file?uuid=19964081-e12c-4d27-b26a-ee3c8149a328&groupId=43805.Google Scholar
Duarte-Neto, P., Lessa, R., Stosic, B. and Morize, E. (2008) The use of sagittal otoliths in discriminating stocks of common dolphinfish (Coryphaena hippurus) off northeastern Brazil using multishape descriptors. ICES Journal of Marine Science 65, 1144–1152.Google Scholar
Fischer, W., Bauchot, M.L. and Schneider, M. (1987) Fiches FAO d'identification des espèces pour les besoins de la pêche. Méditerranée et Mer Noire, zone de pêche 37 (I, II). Rome: FAO, 1527 pp.Google Scholar
Franchini, P., Sola, L., Crosetti, D., Milana, V. and Rossi, R.A. (2011) Low levels of population genetic structure in the gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata) along the coast of Italy. ICES Journal of Marine Science 69, 41–50.Google Scholar
Gagliano, M. and McCormick, M.I. (2004) Feeding history influences otolith shape in tropical fish. Marine Ecology Progress Series 278, 291–296.Google Scholar
Galley, E.A., Wright, P.J. and Gibb, F.M. (2006) Combined methods of otolith shape analysis improve identification of spawning areas of Atlantic cod. ICES Journal of Marine Science 63, 1710–1717.Google Scholar
Gauldie, R.W. (1988) Tagging and genetically isolated stocks of fish: a test of one stock hypothesis and the development of another. Journal of Applied Ichthyology 4, 168–173.Google Scholar
Gauldie, R.W. (1991) Taking stock of genetic concept in fisheries management. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 48, 722–731.Google Scholar
Gibbons, J.D. (1985) Nonparametric statistical inference. 2nd edition. New York, NY: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
Gkafas, G. A., Tsigenopoulos, C., Magoulas, A., Panagiotaki, P., Vafidis, D., Mamuris, Z. and Exadactylos, A. (2013) Population subdivision of saddled seabream Oblada melanura in the Aegean Sea revealed by genetic and morphometric analyses. Aquatic Biology 18, 69–80.Google Scholar
Gulland, J.A. (1969) Manual of methods for fish stock assessment. Part 1. Fish population analysis. FAO Manual of Fisheries Science 4, 154 pp.Google Scholar
Harmelin-Vivien, M.L., Harmelin, G. and Leboulleux, V. (1995) Microhabitat requirements for settlement of juvenile sparid fishes on Mediterranean rocky shores. Hydrobiologia 300–301, 309–320.Google Scholar
Hecht, T. and Appelbaum, S. (1982) Morphology and taxonomic significance of the otoliths of some bathypelagic Anguilloidei and Saccopharyngoidei from the Sargasso Sea. Helgolander Meeresunters 35, 301–308.Google Scholar
Hills, J., Lines, J., Baranauskas, E., Mapp, J. and Bagnall, A. (2014) Classification of time series by shapelet transformation. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 28, 851–881.Google Scholar
Hüssy, K. (2008) Otolith shape in juvenile cod (Gadus morhua): ontogenetic and environmental effects. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 364, 35–41.Google Scholar
Ihssen, P.E., Booke, H.E., Casselman, J.M., McGlade, J.M., Payne, N.R. and Utter, E.M. (1981) Stock identification: materials and methods. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 38, 1838–1855.Google Scholar
Iwata, H., Niikura, S., Matsuura, S., Takano, Y. and Ukai, Y. (1998) Evaluation of variation of root shape of Japanese radish (Raphanus sativus L.) based on image analysis using elliptic Fourier descriptors. Euphytica 102, 143–149.Google Scholar
Iwata, H. and Ukai, Y. (2002) SHAPE: a computer program package for quantitative evaluation of biological shapes based on elliptic Fourier descriptors. Journal of Heredity 93, 384–385.Google Scholar
Jamieson, A. (1973) Genetic ‘tags’ for marine fish stocks. In Hardin, J.F.R. (ed.) Sea fisheries research. London: Elek Science, pp. 91–99.Google Scholar
Jawad, L.A., Hoedemakers, K., Ibáñez, A.L., Ahmed, Y.A., Abu El-Regal, M.A. and Mehanna, S.F. (2017) Morphology study of the otoliths of the parrotfish, Chlorurus sordidus (Forsskäl, 1775) and Hipposcarus harid (Forsskäl, 1775) from the Red Sea coast of Egypt (Family: Scaridae). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. doi: 10.1017/S0025315416002034.Google Scholar
Jemaa, S., Bacha, M., Khalaf, G., Dessailly, D., Rabhi, K. and Amara, R. (2015) What can otolith shape analysis tell us about population structure of the European sardine, Sardina pilchardus, from Atlantic and Mediterranean waters? Journal of Sea Research 96, 11–17.Google Scholar
Kuhl, F.P. and Giardina, C.R. (1982) Elliptic Fourier features of a closed contour. Computer Graphics and Image Processing 18, 236–258.Google Scholar
Libungan, L.A., Slotte, A., Husebø, A., Godiksen, J.A. and Pálsson, A. (2015) Latitudinal gradient in otolith shape among local populations of Atlantic herring (Clupea harengus L.) in Norway. PLoS ONE 10, e0130847.Google Scholar
Lombarte, A. (1992) Changes in otolith area: sensory area ratio with body size and depth. Environmental Biology of Fishes 33, 405–410.Google Scholar
Lombarte, A. and Lleonart, J. (1993) Otolith size changes related with body growth, habitat depth and temperature. Environmental Biology of Fish 37, 297–306.Google Scholar
Mahé, K., Oudard, C., Mille, T., Keating, J., Gonçalves, P., Clausen, L.W., Petursdottir, G., Rasmussen, H., Meland, E., Mullins, E., Pinnegar, J.K., Hoines, A. and Trenkel, V.M. (2016) Identifying blue whiting (Micromesistius poutassou) stock structure in the Northeast Atlantic by otolith shape analysis. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 73, 1363–1371.Google Scholar
Mapp, J., Hunter, E., Van Der Kooij, J., Songer, S. and Fisher, M. (2017) Otolith shape and size: the importance of age when determining indices for fish-stock separation. Fisheries Research 190, 43–52.Google Scholar
Megalofonou, P. (2006) Comparison of otolith growth and morphology with somatic growth and age in young-of-the-year bluefin tuna. Journal of Fish Biology 68, 1867–1878.Google Scholar
Mérigot, B., Letourneur, Y. and Lecomte-Finiger, R. (2007) Characterization of local populations of the common sole Solea solea (Pisces: Soleidae) in the NW Mediterranean through otolith morphometrics and shape analysis. Marine Biology 151, 997–1008.Google Scholar
Nikolioudakis, N., Koumoundouros, G. and Somarakis, S. (2014) Synchronization in allometric and morphological changes during metamorphosis: comparison among four sparid species. Aquatic Biology 21, 155–165.Google Scholar
Pallaoro, A., Šantić, M. and Jardas, I. (2003) Feeding habits of the saddled bream Oblada melanura (Sparidae), in the Adriatic Sea. Cybium 27, 261–268.Google Scholar
Parisi-Baradad, V., Lombarte, A., García-Ladona, E., Cabestany, J., Piera, J. and Chic, O. (2005) Otolith shape contour analysis using affine transformation invariant wavelet transforms and curvature scale space representation. Marine and Freshwater Research 56, 795–804.Google Scholar
Pothin, K., Gonzalez-Salas, C., Chabanet, P. and Lecomte-Finiger, R. (2006) Distinction between Mulloidichthys flavolineatus juveniles from Reunion Island and Mauritius Island (south-west Indian Ocean) based on otolith morphometrics. Journal of Fish Biology 68, 1–16.Google Scholar
Renán, X., Pérez-Díaz, E., Colás- Marrufo, T., Garza- Pérez, J.J.R. and Brulé, T. (2010) Using otolith shape analysis to identify different stocks of Epinephelus morio from the Campeche Bank. In Proceedings of the 63rd Gulf and Caribbean Fisheries Institute, 1–5 November 2010, San Juan, Puerto Rico.Google Scholar
Rohlf, F.J. and Archie, J.W. (1984) A comparison of Fourier methods for the description of wing shape in mosquitoes (Ritera culicidae). Systematic Zoology 33, 302–317.Google Scholar
Roques, S., Galarza, J.A. and Macpherson, E. (2007a) Isolation of eight microsatellites loci from the saddled bream, Oblada melanura and cross-species amplification in two sea bream species of the genus Diplodus. Conservation Genetics 8, 1255–1257.Google Scholar
Roques, S., Galarza, J.A., Macpherson, E., Turner, G.F. and Rico, C. (2007b) Isolation and characterization of nine polymorphic microsatellite markers in the two-banded sea bream (Diplodus vulgaris) and cross-species amplification in the white sea bream (Diplodus sargus) and the saddled bream (Oblada melanura). Molecular Ecology Notes 7, 661–663.Google Scholar
Smrzlić, V.I., Valić, D., Kapetanović, D., Kurtović, B. and Teskeredžić, E. (2012) Molecular characterisation of Anisakidae larvae from fish in Adriatic Sea. Parasitology Research 111, 2385–2391.Google Scholar
Summerer, M., Hanel, R. and Sturmbaue, C. (2001) Mitochondrial phylogeny and biogeographic affinities of sea breams of the genus Diplodus (Sparidae). Journal of Fish Biology 59, 1638–1652.Google Scholar
Suquet, M., Divanach, P., Hussenot, J., Coves, D. and Fauvel, C. (2009) Marine fish culture of ‘new species’ farmed in Europe. Cahiers Agricultures 18, 148–156.Google Scholar
Swan, S.C., Geffen, A.J., Gordon, J.D.M., Morales-Nin, B. and Shimmield, T. (2006) Effects of handling and storage methods on the concentrations of elements in deep-water fish otoliths. Journal of Fish Biology 68, 891–904.Google Scholar
Torres, G. J., Lombarte, A. and Morales-Nin, B. (2000) Variability of the sulcus acusticus in the sagitta otolith of the genus Merluccius. Fisheries Research 46, 5–13.Google Scholar
Tracey, S.R., Lyle, J.M. and Guy Duhamelb, S.R. (2006) Application of elliptical Fourier analysis of otolith form as tool for stock identification. Fisheries Research 77, 138–147.Google Scholar
Trojette, M., Ben Faleh, A., Fatnassi, M., Marsaoui, B., Mahouachi, N.E.H., Chalh, A.Quignard, J.P. and Trabelsi, M. (2015) Stock discrimination of two insular populations of Diplodus annularis (Actinopterygii: Perciformes: Sparidae) along the coast of Tunisia by analysis of otolith shape. Acta Ichthyologica et Piscatoria 45, 363–372.Google Scholar
Turan, C. (2004) Stock identification of Mediterranean horse mackerel (Trachurus mediterraneus) using morphometric and meristic characters. ICES Journal of Marine Science 61, 774–781.Google Scholar
Vieira, A.R., Neves, A., Sequiera, V., Paiva, R.B. and Gordo, L.S. (2014) Otolith shape analysis as a tool for stock discrimination of forkbeard (Phycis phycis) in the Northeast Atlantic. Hydrobiologia 728, 103–110.Google Scholar
Vignon, M. and Morat, F. (2010) Environmental and genetic determinant of otolith shape revealed by a non-indigenous tropical fish. Marine Ecology Progress Series 411, 231–241.Google Scholar
Waldman, J.R. (2007) Definition of stock: an envolving concept. In Cadrin, S.X., Friedland, K.D. and Waldman, J.R. (eds) Stock identification methods. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 719 pp.Google Scholar
Ward, T. and Rogers, P. (2003) Northern mackerel (Scombridae: Scomberomorus): current and future research needs, Final Report for FRDC Project 2002/096, South Australian Research and Development Institute, Henley Beach, SA, Australia.Google Scholar
Yoshioka, Y., Iwata, H., Ohsawa, R. and Ninomiya, S. (2004) Analysis of petal shape variation of Primula sieboldii by elliptic Fourier descriptors and principal component analysis. Annals of Botany 94, 657–664.Google Scholar