Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-g4j75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-23T21:00:25.611Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the integument and photophores of the alepocephalid fishes Xenodermichthys and Photostylus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

A. C. G. Best  and
Q. Bone
A. C. G. Best
Affiliation:
The Laboratory, Marine Biological Association Citadel Hill, Plymouth
Q. Bone
Affiliation:
The Laboratory, Marine Biological Association Citadel Hill, Plymouth
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The mesopelagic alepocephalid fishes Xenodermichthys and Photostylus have unusual compartmented sub-dermal spaces filled with a fluid more dilute than sea water. The fluid is probably lymph, and contributes to the low density of the fish. The external layer superficial to these subdermal spaces consists of cells containing large intracellular paracrystals which form tubular arrays. This external layer is interrupted by numerous photophores (in Photostylus borne on stalks) which have a reddish-violet central core, and are backed by a reflecting layer. The reflector does not contain guanine, it is made up of a series of flattened cells, and reflects blue-green light. The cells of the central core are assumed to be photocytes and are in connexion with apparent nerve terminals, but in neither fish has luminescence of the photophores been observed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 56 , Issue 1 , February 1976 , pp. 227 - 236
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bassot, J-M., 1966. On the comparative morphology of some luminous organs. In Bioluminescence in progress, eds Johnson, F. H. and Haneda, Y., 557–610. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Beebe, W., 1933. Deep sea fishes of the Bermuda oceanographic expeditions. Family Alepocephalidae. Zoologica, New York, 16(2), 13–93.Google Scholar
Denton, E. J., Gilpin-Brown, J. B. & Wright, P. G., 1970. On the niters in the photophores of mesopelagic fish and on a fish emitting red light and especially sensitive to red light. Journal of Physiology, 208, 72–3P.Google Scholar
Denton, E. J., Gilpin-Brown, J. B. & Wright, P. G., 1972. The angular distribution of the light produced by some mesopelagic fish in relation to their camouflage. Proceedings of the Royal Society (B), 182, 145–58.Google Scholar
Denton, E. J. & Land, M. F., 1971. Mechanism of reflexion in silvery layers offish and cephalopods. Proceedings of the Royal Society (B), 173, 43–61.Google Scholar
Denton, E. J. & Marshall, N. B., 1958. The buoyancy of bathypelagic fishes without a gas-filled swimbladder. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 37, 753–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodyear, R. H., 1969. Records of the alepocephalid fish Photostylus pycnopterus in the Indian and Pacific oceans. Copeia, 1969, 398–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Günther, A., 1887. Report on the deep sea fishes collected by HMS Challenger during the years 1873–1876. In Report on the scientific results of the exploring voyage of H.M.S. Challenger 1873–1876 (Zoology), 22, 1–268. London.Google Scholar
Lendenfeld, R. Von, 1887. Report on the structure of the phosphorescent organs of fishes. In Report on the scientific results of the exploring voyage of H.M.S. Challenger 1873–1876 (Appendix B), 277–329. London.Google Scholar
Locket, N. A., 1972. The reflecting structure in the iridescent cornea of the serranid teleost Nemanthias carberryi. Proceedings of the Royal Society (B), 249–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsubara, K. & Iwai, T., 1969. Notes on the alepocephalid fish Xenodermichthys nodulosm Günther, from Japan. Bulletin of the Misaki Marine Biological Institute, 1–10.Google Scholar
Murray, R. W. & Potts, W. T. W., 1961. The composition of the endolymph perilymph and other body fluids of elasmobranchs. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology, 2, 65–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nusbaum-Hilarowicz, J., 1923. Études d'anatomie comparée sur les poissons provenant des campagnes scientifiques de S.A.S. le Prince de Monaco. Résultats des campagnes scientifiques accompliés par le Prince Albert I, Monaco II, Fasc. 65, 1–100.Google Scholar
O'day, W., 1972. The histology and fine structure of some bioluminescent organs in deep sea fishes. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Southern California.Google Scholar
Pantin, C. F. A., 1946. Notes on microscopical technique for zoologists, viii, 77 pp. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sidman, R. L., 1957. The structure and concentration of solids in photoreceptor cells studied by refractometry and interference microscopy. Journal of Biophysical and Biochemical Cytology, 3, 15–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Starling, D. & Burns, R. G., 1975. Ultrastructure of tubulin paracrystals from sea-urchin eggs with determination of spacings by electron and optical diffraction. Journal of Ultrastructure Research, 51, 261–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strum, J. M., 1969. Fine structure of the dermal luminescent organs, photophores, in the fish Porichthys notatus. Anatomical Record, 164, 433–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trincker, D., 1962. The transformation of mechanical stimuli into nervous excitation by the labyrinthine receptors. Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology, 16, 289–316.Google Scholar
Winkelmann, R. K. & Schmitt, R. W., 1957. A simple silver method for nerve axoplasm. Proceedings. Mayo Clinic, 32, 217–22.Google ScholarPubMed