Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T23:25:38.913Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

High diversity of dinoflagellates in the intertidal sandy sediments of Wimereux (north-east English Channel, France)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 December 2013

Fernando Gómez  and
Luis F. Artigas
Fernando Gómez*
Affiliation:
Laboratoire d'Océanologie et Géosciences, CNRS UMR 8187, Université du Littoral Côte d'Opale, MREN ULCO, 32 av. Foch, 62930 Wimereux, France Laboratory of Plankton Systems, Oceanographic Institute, University of São Paulo, Praça do Oceanográfico 191, sala 100, São Paulo, SP 05508-120, Brazil
Luis F. Artigas
Affiliation:
Laboratoire d'Océanologie et Géosciences, CNRS UMR 8187, Université du Littoral Côte d'Opale, MREN ULCO, 32 av. Foch, 62930 Wimereux, France
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: F. Gómez, Laboratory of Plankton Systems, Oceanographic Institute, University of São Paulo, Praça do Oceanográfico 191, sala 100, São Paulo, SP 05508-120, Brazil email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Benthic dinoflagellates collected in spring–summer 2010 and 2011 from intertidal sandy sediments of the shore of Wimereux (north-east English Channel, France) were examined by light microscopy, and some of them by scanning electron microscopy. High dinoflagellate species richness, 70 species, was evidenced when compared to the plankton observed in the coastal waters of the north-east English Channel. The greatest difficulty in performing accurate species identification mainly concerned the heterotrophic species of Amphidinium sensu lato, the laterally flattened species of Amphidiniopsis, as well as some heterotrophic species of Thecadinium. Several undescribed species are here illustrated, mainly within these genera. The differences in size between species of Herdmania and Sabulodinium suggest the occurrence of at least a second species for these monotypic genera. The species Amphidiniopsis hexagona, A. rotundata, A. uroensis and Sinophysis minima are reported for the first time in the Atlantic Ocean and on European coasts. Although these species were only previously known from the Pacific Ocean, they should not necessarily be considered as newcomers or invasive species due to the scarce coverage of the previous studies on sand-dwelling dinoflagellates.

Keywords

benthic microbial loopbiodiversityDinophytamicrophytobenthosnorth-east Atlanticpsammophilic protistsand-dwelling Dinophyceaetaxonomy
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 94 , Issue 3 , May 2014 , pp. 443 - 457
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Al-Yamani, F.Y. and Saburova, M. (2010) Illustrated guide on the flagellates of Kuwait′s intertidal soft sediments. Safat: Kuwait Institute for Scientific Research.Google Scholar
Balech, E. (1956) Étude des dinoflagellés du sable de Roscoff. Revue Algologique 2, 29–52.Google Scholar
Brylinski, J.-M., Lagadeuc, Y., Gentilhomme, V., Dupont, J.-P., Lafite, R., Dupeuble, P.-A., Huault, M.-F., Auger, Y., Puskaric, E., Wartel, M. and Cabioch, L. (1991) Le «fleuve côtier»: un phénomène hydrologique important en Manche orientale. Exemple du Pas-de-Calais. Oceanologica Acta 11, 197–203.Google Scholar
Consalvey, M., Paterson, D.M. and Underwood, G.J.C. (2004) The ups and downs of life in a benthic biofilm: migration of benthic diatoms. Diatom Research 19, 181–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewarumez, J.-M., Gevaert, F., Massé, C., Foveau, A. and Grulois, D. (2011) Les espèces marines animales et végétales introduites dans le bassin Artois–Picardie. Wimereux: UMR CNRS 8187 LOG et Agence de l'Eau Artois–Picardie.Google Scholar
Dodge, J.D. and Lewis, J. (1986) A further study of armoured sand-dwelling marine dinoflagellates. Protistologica 22, 221–230.Google Scholar
Dragesco, J. (1965) Étude cytologique de quelques flagelles mesopsammiques. Cahiers de Biologie Marine 6, 83–115.Google Scholar
Flø Jørgensen, M., Murray, S. and Daugbjerg, N. (2004) Amphidinium revisited. I. Redefinition of Amphidinium (Dinophyceae) based on cladistic and molecular phylogenetic analyses. Journal of Phycology 40, 351–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gómez, F. (2008) Phytoplankton invasions: comments on the validity of categorizing the non-indigenous dinoflagellates and diatoms in European Seas. Marine Pollution Bulletin 56, 620–628.Google Scholar
Gómez, F. (2012) A quantitative review of the lifestyle, habitat and trophic diversity of dinoflagellates (Dinoflagellata, Alveolata). Systematics and Biodiversity 10, 267–275.Google Scholar
Gómez, F. and Artigas, L.F. (2013) The formation of the twin resting cysts in the dinoflagellate Dissodinium pseudolunula, a parasite of copepod eggs. Journal of Plankton Research 35, 1167–1171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gómez, F. and Souissi, S. (2007) The distribution and life cycle of the dinoflagellate Spatulodinium pseudonoctiluca (Dinophyceae, Noctilucales) in the north-eastern English Channel. Comptes Rendus Biologies 330, 231–236.Google Scholar
Gómez, F. and Souissi, S. (2008) The impact of the 2003 summer heat wave and the 2005 late cold wave on the phytoplankton in the north-eastern English Channel. Comptes Rendus Biologies 331, 678–685.Google Scholar
Gómez, F. and Souissi, S. (2010) The diatoms Odontella sinensis, Coscinodiscus wailesii and Thalassiosira punctigera in the European Atlantic: recent introductions or overlooked in the past? Fresenius Environmental Bulletin 19, 1424–1433.Google Scholar
Gómez, F., López-García, P. and Moreira, D. (2011) Molecular phylogeny of the sand-dwelling dinoflagellates Amphidiniopsis hirsuta and A. swedmarkii (Peridiniales, Dinophyceae). Acta Protozoologica 50, 255–262.Google Scholar
Gómez, F., Moreira, D. and López-García, P. (2012) Sinophysis and Pseudophalacroma are distantly related to typical dinophysoid dinoflagellates (Dinophysales, Dinophyceae). Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology 59, 188–190.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grattepanche, J.-D., Vincent, D., Breton, E. and Christaki, U. (2011) Microzooplankton herbivory during the diatom-Phaeocystis spring succession in the eastern English Channel. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 404, 87–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herdman, E.C. (1922) Notes on dinoflagellates and other organisms causing discolouration of the sand at Port Erin II. Proceedings and Transactions of the Liverpool Biological Society 36, 15–30.Google Scholar
Herdman, E.C. (1924) Notes on dinoflagellates and other organisms causing discolouration of the sand at Port Erin IV. Proceedings and Transactions of the Liverpool Biological Society 38, 75–84.Google Scholar
Horiguchi, T. & Pienaar, R.N. (1988) Ultrastructure of a new sand-dwelling dinoflagellate, Scrippsiella arenicola sp. nov. Journal of Phycology 24, 426–438.Google Scholar
Horiguchi, T., Hayashi, Y., Kudo, H. and Hara, Y. (2011) A new benthic dinoflagellate Spiniferodinium palauense sp. nov. (Dinophyceae) from Palau. Phycologia 50, 616–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hubas, C., Lamy, D., Artigas, L.F. and Davoult, D. (2007) Seasonal variability of intertidal bacterial metabolism and growth efficiency in an exposed sandy beach during low tide. Marine Biology 151, 41–52.Google Scholar
Janssen, M., Hust, M., Rhiel, E. and Krumbein, W.E. (1999) Vertical migration behaviour of diatom assemblages of Wadden Sea sediments (Dangast, Germany): a study using cryo-scanning electron microscopy. International Microbiology 2, 103–110.Google Scholar
Kingston, M.B. and Gough, J.S. (2009) Vertical migration of a mixed-species Euglena (Euglenophyta) assemblage inhabiting the high-intertidal sands of Nye Beach, Oregon. Journal of Phycology 45, 1021–1029.Google Scholar
Korotenko, K.A. and Sentchev, A.V. (2011) Study turbulence in shallow tidal coastal zone. Oceanology 51, 1–14.Google Scholar
Larsen, J. (1985) Algal studies of the Danish Wadden Sea II. A taxonomic study of psammobious dinoflagellates. Opera Botanica 79, 14–37.Google Scholar
Laza-Martínez, A., Orive, E. and Irati, M. (2011) Morphological and genetic characterization of benthic dinoflagellates of the genera Coolia, Ostreopsis and Prorocentrum from the south-eastern Bay of Biscay. European Journal of Phycology 46, 45–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margalef, R. (1978) Life-forms of phytoplankton as survival alternatives in an unstable environment. Oceanologica Acta 1, 493–509.Google Scholar
Mitbavkar, S. and Anil, A.C. (2004) Vertical migratory rhythms of benthic diatoms in a tropical intertidal sand flat: influence of irradiance and tides. Marine Biology 145, 9–20.Google Scholar
Murray, S. and Patterson, D.J. (2002) The benthic dinoflagellate genus Amphidinium in south-eastern Australian waters, including three new species. European Journal of Phycology 37, 279–298.Google Scholar
Murray, S., Nagahama, Y. and Fukuyo, Y. (2007) Phylogenetic study of benthic, spine-bearing prorocentroids, including Prorocentrum fukuyoi sp. nov. Phycological Research 55, 91–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, S.A., Garby, T., Hoppenrath, M. and Neilan, B.A. (2012) Genetic diversity, morphological uniformity and polyketide production in dinoflagellates (Amphidinium, Dinoflagellata). PLoS ONE 7(6), e38253.Google Scholar
Palmer, J.D. and Round, F.E. (1965) Persistent, vertical-migration rhythms in benthic microflora. I. The effect of light and temperature on the rhythmic behaviour of Euglena obtusa. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 45, 567–582.Google Scholar
Paulmier, G. (1992) Catalogue illustré des microphytes planctoniques et benthiques des côtes Normandes. Rapports internes de la Direction des Ressources Vivantes de l'IFREMER.Google Scholar
Saunders, R.D. and Dodge, J.D. (1984) An SEM study and taxonomic revision of some armoured sand-dwelling marine dinoflagellates. Protistologica 20, 271–283.Google Scholar
Schiller, J. (1933) Dinoflagellatae (Peridineae) in monographischer Behandlung. 10[3]. In L. Rabenhorst's Krytogamen-Flora von Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz. Leipzig: Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft, pp. 1–617.Google Scholar
Sentchev, A. and Yaremchuk, M. (2007) VHF radar observations of surface currents off the northern Opal coast in the eastern English Channel. Continental Shelf Research 27, 2449–2464.Google Scholar
Spilmont, N., Migné, A., Lefebvre, A., Artigas, L.F., Rauch, M. and Davoult, D. (2005) Temporal variability of intertidal benthic metabolism under emersed conditions in an exposed sandy beach (Wimereux, eastern English Channel, France). Journal of Sea Research 53, 161–167.Google Scholar
Underwood, G.J.C., Boulcott, M., Raines, C.A. and Waldron, K. (2004) Environmental effects on exopolymer production by marine benthic diatoms: dynamics, changes in composition, and pathways of production. Journal of Phycology 49, 293–304.Google Scholar
Yasumoto, T., Nakajima, I., Bagnis, R. and Adachi, R. (1977) Finding of a dinoflagellate as a likely culprit of ciguatera. Bulletin of the Japanese Society of Scientific Fisheries 43, 1021–1026.Google Scholar
Yoshimatsu, S., Toriumi, S. and Dodge, J.D. (2000) Light and scanning microscopy of two benthic species of Amphidiniopsis (Dinophyceae), Amphidiniopsis hexagona sp. nov. and Amphidiniopsis swedmarkii from Japan. Phycological Research 48, 107–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar