Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T04:39:41.905Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Feeding ecology, growth and sexual cycle of the sand sole, Solea lascaris, along the Portuguese coast

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2009

Célia M. Teixeira*
Affiliation:
Universidade de Lisboa, Faculdade de Ciências, Centro de Oceanografia, Campo Grande, 1749-016 Lisboa, Portugal
Ana Pinheiro
Affiliation:
Universidade de Lisboa, Faculdade de Ciências, Centro de Oceanografia, Campo Grande, 1749-016 Lisboa, Portugal
Henrique N. Cabral
Affiliation:
Universidade de Lisboa, Faculdade de Ciências, Centro de Oceanografia, Campo Grande, 1749-016 Lisboa, Portugal
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: Célia M. Teixeira, Universidade de Lisboa, Faculdade de Ciências, Centro de Oceanografia, Campo Grande, 1749-016 Lisboa, Portugal email: [email protected]

Abstract

Sand sole, Solea lascaris, were collected along the Portuguese coast, between October 2002 and July 2003, to examine feeding habits, age and growth and sexual cycle. The most important prey items were Mysidacea, Amphipoda and Polychaeta. Differences in diet according to season and length size were found: Amphipoda were very important in diet during winter, while Echinodermata were consumed mostly in summer; smaller individuals feed on Amphipoda while larger feed on Decapoda. Age of S. lascaris was determined from sagittae otoliths. The length of fish analysed ranged from 61 mm to 340 mm. The von Bertalanffy growth equation parameters differed significantly between sexes (L = 342.3 mm, k = 0.50, t0 = −0.87 and L = 264.5 mm, k = 0.82, t0 = 0.13, females and males, respectively). The highest values of the gonadosomatic index were obtained in winter and spring, when the highest proportion of individuals at spawning stage was recorded.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Andrade, J.P.A.S. (1990) A importância da Ria Formosa no ciclo biológico de Solea senegalensis Kaup 1858, Solea vulgaris Quensel 1806, Solea lascaris (Risso, 1810) e Microchirus azevia (Capello, 1868). PhD thesis. Universidade do Algarve, Faro, Portugal.Google Scholar
Cabral, H.M.R.N. (1998) Utilização do estuário do Tejo como área de viveiro pelos linguados, Solea solea (L., 1758) e Solea senegalensis Kaup, 1858, e robalo, Dicentrarchus labrax (L., 1758). PhD thesis. Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.Google Scholar
Cabral, H.N. (2000a) Distribution and abundance patterns of flatfishes in the Sado estuary, Portugal. Estuaries 53, 351358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cabral, H.N. (2000b) Comparative feeding ecology of two sympatric soles, Solea solea and Solea senegalensis, within the nursery areas of the Tagus estuary. Journal of Fish Biology 57, 15501562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cabral, H.N. and Costa, M.J. (1999) Differential use of nursery areas within the Tagus estuary by sympatric soles, Solea solea and Solea senegalensis. Environmental Biology of Fish 56, 389397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cabral, H.N., Lopes, M. and Loeper, R. (2002) Trophic niche overlap between flatfishes in a nursery area in the Portuguese coast. Scientia Marina 66, 293300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darnaude, A.M., Harmelin-Vivien, M.L. and Salen-Picard, C. (2001) Food partioning among flatfish (Pisces: Pleuronectiformes) juveniles in a Mediterranean coastal shallow sandy area. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 81, 119127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deniel, C. (1981) Les poisons plats en baie de Douarnenez. Reproduction, croissance et migration des Bothidae, Scophthalmidae, Pleuronectidae et Soleidae. PhD thesis. Université de Bretagne Occidentale, Brest, France.Google Scholar
Deniel, C., Le Blanc, C. and Rodriguez, A. (1989) Comparative study of sexual cycles, oogenesis and spawning of two Soleidae, Solea lascaris (Risso, 1810) and Solea impar (Bennet, 1831), on the western coast of Brittany. Journal of Fish Biology 35, 4958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dinis, M.T. (1986) Quatre Soleidae de l'estuaire du Tage. Reproduction et croissance. Essai d'élevage de Solea senegalensis Kaup. PhD thesis, Université de Bretagne Occidentale, Brest, France.Google Scholar
Garcia-Franquesa, E., Molinero, A., Valero, V. and Flos, R. (1996) Influence of sex, age and season on the feeding habits of the flatfish Solea senegalensis. Environmental Biology of Fish 47, 289298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerking, S.D. (1994) Feeding ecology of fish. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Gomes, T.M.M.F. (2002) Reprodução e fecundidade de Solea lascaris (Risso, 1810) em águas costeiras do Norte de Portugal. MSc thesis. Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.Google Scholar
Hyslop, E.J. (1980) Stomach contents analysis: a review of methods and their application. Journal of Fish Biology 17, 415429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koutsikopoulos, C., Dorel, D. and Desaunay, Y. (1995) Movement of sole (Solea solea) in the Bay of Biscay: coastal environment and spawning. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 75, 109126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marinaro, J.Y. and Bouabid, M. (1983) Ecologie alimentaire de deux soles d'Algérie, Pegusa nasuta (Pallas) et P. lascaris (Risso) (Téléostéens soléidés). Rapport du Commission Internationale de la Mer Méditerranée 28, 7375.Google Scholar
Molinero, A. and Flos, R. (1991) Influence of sex and age on the feeding habits of the common sole Solea solea. Marine Biology 111, 493501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, J.G. (1986a) Citharidae. In Whitehead, P.J.P., Bauchot, M.L., Hureau, J.C., Nielsen, J. and Tortonese, E. (eds) Fishes of the north-eastern Atlantic and the Mediterranean. Paris: UNESCO, p. 1286.Google Scholar
Nielsen, J.G. (1986b) Scophthalmidae. In Whitehead, P.J.P., Bauchot, M.L., Hureau, J.C., Nielsen, J. and Tortonese, E. (eds) Fishes of the north-eastern Atlantic and the Mediterranean. Paris: UNESCO, pp. 12871293.Google Scholar
Nielsen, J.G. (1986c) Bothidae. In Whitehead, P.J.P., Bauchot, M.L., Hureau, J.C., Nielsen, J. and Tortonese, E. (eds) Fishes of the north-eastern Atlantic and the Mediterranean. Paris: UNESCO, pp. 12941298.Google Scholar
Nielsen, J.G. (1986d) Pleuronectidae. In Whitehead, P.J.P., Bauchot, M.L., Hureau, J.C., Nielsen, J. and Tortonese, E. (eds) Fishes of the north-eastern Atlantic and the Mediterranean. Paris: UNESCO, pp. 12991307.Google Scholar
Quéro, J.C., Desoutter, M. and Lagardère, F. (1986a) Soleidae. In Whitehead, P.J.P., Bauchot, M.L., Hureau, J.C., Nielsen, J. and Tortonese, E. (eds) Fishes of the north-eastern Atlantic and the Mediterranean. Paris: UNESCO, pp. 13081324.Google Scholar
Quéro, J.C., Desoutter, M. and Lagardère, F. (1986b) Cynoglossidae. In Whitehead, P.J.P., Bauchot, M.L., Hureau, J.C., Nielsen, J. and Tortonese, E. (eds) Fishes of the north-eastern Atlantic and the Mediterranean. Paris: UNESCO, pp. 13251328.Google Scholar
Rodriguez, A. (1996) Regime alimentaire de deux soleidae, Solea lascaris et Solea impar de la côte ouest de Bretagne. Cybium 20, 261277.Google Scholar
ter Braak, C.J.F. and Smilauer, P. (1998) CANOCO reference manual and user's guide to Canoco for Windows: software for Canonical Community Ordination (version 4). Ithaca, NY: Microcomputer Power.Google Scholar
Wootton, R.J. (1998) Feeding. In Wootton, R.J. (ed.) Ecology of teleost fishes. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 2762.Google Scholar