Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-03T19:20:26.087Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Environmental influences upon the expression of shell form in Rissoa parva (da Costa). [Gastropoda: Prosobranchia]

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

G. D. Wigham
G. D. Wigham*
Affiliation:
Zoology Department, University of Reading
*
*Present address: Zoology Department, University College of Swansea
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The classification of the Rissoidae has been, and continues to be, based largely upon shell characters. In a group of small animals of variable form this has resulted in a state of considerable taxonomic confusion. Ponder (1965, 1967, 1968), in his works on the New Zealand Rissoidae, attempted to clarify, what he termed, the existing ‘pigeon-hole classification’ in the light of more detailed anatomical investigation. He observed (Ponder, 1967) that ‘many wrong assumptions can be drawn from the study of the shell alone’. In an earlier work Johansson (1939) had also tried to relate the taxonomy of the Rissoidae to anatomical features.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 55 , Issue 2 , May 1975 , pp. 425 - 438
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, J., 1798. Descriptions of some minute British shells. Transactions of the Linnean Society of London, 5, 1–6 (1800).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryan, G. W., 1969. The effects of oil-spill removers (detergents) on the gastropod Nucella lapillus (L.). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 49, 1067–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clench, W. J., 1947. The genera Purpura and Thais in the Western Atlantic. Johnsonia, 2, 61–92.Google Scholar
Costa, E. M. Da, 1778. Historia naturalis testaceorum Britanniae, or the British conchology; containing the natural history of the shells of Great Britain and Ireland, xii, 254, vii pp. London: Millan, White, Elmsley & Robson.Google Scholar
Cowell, E. B. & Crothers, J. H., 1970. On the occurrence of multiple rows of ‘teeth’ in the shell of the dog whelk, Nucella lapillus (L.). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 50, 1101–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crothers, J. H., 1971. Further observations on the occurrence of ‘teeth’ in the dog whelk, Nucella lapillus. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 51, 623–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dugal, L. P., 1939. The use of the calcareous shell to buffer the product of anaerobic glycolysis in Venus mercenaria. Journal of Cellular and Comparative Physiology, 13, 235–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feare, C. J., 1970. Aspects of the ecology of an exposed shore population of dog whelks, Nucella lapillus. Oecologia, 5, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forbes, E. & Hanley, S., 1850. A history of British Mollusca, and their shells. 4 vols. 2 (1849), 3 (1850), 4 (1852–3). London: Van Voorst.Google Scholar
Fretter, V. & Graham, A., 1962. British prosobranch molluscs. 755 pp. London: Ray Society.Google Scholar
Fretter, V. & Pilkington, M. C, 1970. Prosobranchia: Veliger larvae of Taenioglossa and Stenoglossa. Fiches d'identification du zooplancton, Conseil Internationale pour VExploration de la Mer, Sheets 129–32.Google Scholar
Gostan, G., 1958. Correlation entre la croissance de la coquille d'un prosobranche (Rissoa parva) et le developpement des organes internes. Comptes rendu de I Academie des sciences, Paris, 247, 2193–5.Google Scholar
Gostan, G., 1966. Aspects cycliques de la morphogenese de la coquille de Rissoa parva (da Costa). (Gasteropode, Prosobranche.)Bulletin du Laboratoire Arago, 17 A, 9–97.Google Scholar
Hubendick, B. & Waren, A., 1970. Smasnackor uid svenska vastkusten. 2. Slaktena Rissoa och Onoba. Goteborgs Naturhistoriska Museum Arstryck, 87–95.Google Scholar
James, B. L., 1968. The characters and distribution of the sub-species and varieties of Littorina saxatilis in Great Britain. Cahiers de biologie marine, 9, 143–65.Google Scholar
Jeffreys, J. G., 1862–9. British conchology, Vols. 1–5. 1 (1862), 2 (1863), 3 (1865), 4 (1867), 5 (1869). London: Van Voorst.Google Scholar
Johansson, J., 1939. Anatomische Studien Uber die Gasteropoden-familien Rissoidae und Littorinidae. Zoologiska bidrag frdn Uppsala, 18, 289–96.Google Scholar
Kitching, J. A., Muntz, L. & Ebling, F. J., 1966. The ecology of Lough Ine. XV. The ecological significance of shell and body forms in Nucella. Journal of Animal Ecology, 35, 113–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Largen, M. J., 1971. Genetic and environmental influences upon the expression of shell sculpture in the dog whelk (Nucella lapillus). Proceedings of the Malacological Society of London, 39, 383–8.Google Scholar
Nordsieck, F., 1972. Die europdischen Meeresschnecken Opisthobranchia mit Pyramidellidae; Rissoacea. xiii, 327 pp. Stuttgart: Fischer Verlag.Google Scholar
North, W. J., 1954. Size distribution, erosive activities and gross metabolic efficiency of the marine intertidal snails, Littorina planaxis and Littorina scutalata. Biological Bulletin. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Mass., 106, 185–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ponder, W. F., 1965. A revision of the New Zealand recent species previously known as Notosetia iredale, 1915. (Rissoidae, Gastropoda.)Record of the Auckland Institute and Museum, 6, 101–31.Google Scholar
Ponder, W. F., 1967. The classification of the Rissoidae and Orbitestellidae with descriptions of some new taxa. Transactions of the Royal Society, New Zealand, 9, 193–224.Google Scholar
Ponder, W. F., 1968. The morphology of some small New Zealand prosobranchs. Record of the Dominion Museum, 6, 61–95.Google Scholar
Russell, P. J. C, 1972. A significance of the number of ribs on two closely related species of Cardium. Journal of Conchology, 27, 401–9.Google Scholar
Struhsaker, J. W., 1968. Selection mechanisms associated with intraspecific shell variation in Littorina picta. Evolution, 22, 459–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waddington, C. H., 1939. An introduction to modern genetics. 441 pp. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Wigham, G. D., 1975. The biology and ecology of Rissoa parva (da Costa). (Gastropoda: Prosobranchia.)Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 55, 45–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zwann, A. De & Zandee, D. I., 1972. Utilization of glycogen and accumulation of some inter-mediates during anaerobiosis in Mytilus edulis. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology, 43 b, 47–54.Google Scholar