Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T01:02:05.792Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Distribution and movements of intertidal butterfish Pholis gunnellus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

J. H. Koop  and
R. N. Gibson
J. H. Koop
Affiliation:
Department of Marine Biology, University of Groningen, PO Box 14, 9750 AA Haren, The Netherlands
R. N. Gibson
Affiliation:
Dunstaffnage Marine Laboratory, PO Box 3, Oban, Argyll, PA34 4AD
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The distribution and movements of intertidal butterfish Pholisgunnellus were studied on the westcoast of Scotland in relation to the foraging tactics of one of its major predators, the otter. Fish were individually tagged and released at low tide in restricted areas of 5 m wide running from the top of the shore towards the sea. Population density increased from 015 fish m" at the top of the shore to 1–1 fish nv in the Laminaria zone. The median total length of all fish examined was 92 mm (N=369) with a very distinct length class of 70–80 mm. There was no relationship between length and position on the shore. Only 24 out of 156 tagged fish were recaptured inside the restricted areas. The recaptured fish had moved a mean of 21 m (SD 1–9 m) in 1–6 days (SD 1–0 days), the directions of movement being randomly distributed. Repopulation rates were studied by removing all fish from three areas of approximately 180 m each. Fish of the same size moved into the cleared areas within two tidal cycles although in much smaller numbers (only 27–52% of the initial populations). Disturbance of the habitat probably played an important role because there was a general decline in numbers in regularly visited areas throughout the experiments. It is concluded that, even allowing for this disturbance intertidal butterfish are mobile and relatively unrestricted in their movements. From the point of view of predators like the otter and the heron, more butterfish are to be caught lower down the shore and each butterfish caught will soon be replaced by another of about the same size.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 71 , Issue 1 , February 1991 , pp. 127 - 136
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ballantine, W.J. 1961. A biologically defined exposure scale for the comparative description of rockyshores. Field Studies, 1 (3), 19 pp.Google Scholar
Batschelet, E. 1981. Circular Statistics in Biology. London:Academic press.Google Scholar
Burgess, T.J. 1978 The comparative ecology of two sympatric polychromatic populations of Xererpes fucontm Jordan & Gilbert (Pisces: Pholididae) from the rocky intertidal zone of Central California. journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 35, 43–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, R.N. 1967. The use of the anaesthetic quinaldine in fish ecology, journal of Animal Ecology, 36, 295–301.Google Scholar
Gibson, R.N. 1988. Patterns of movement in intertidal fishes. In Behavioral Adaptation to Intertidal Life (ed. Chelazzi, G. And Vannini, M.), pp. 55–63. New York:Plentum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruuk, H.Nolet., B. & French, D. 1988. Fluctuations in numbers and activity of inshore demersal fishes in Shetland. journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 68, 601–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qasim, S.Z. 1957. The biology of Centronotusgunnellus(L.)(Teleostei). journal of Animal Ecology, 26, 389–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sachs, L. 1982 Applied Statistics: A handbook of Techniques. Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sawyer, P.J. 1967. Intertidal life-history of the rock gunnel, Pholis gunnellus, in the western Atlantic. Copeia, 1967, 55–61.Google Scholar
Sokal, R.R. & Rohlf, F.J. 1981. Biometry. San Francisco:W.H. Freeman and Company.Google Scholar
Wheeler, A. 1978. Key to the Fishes of Northern Europe. London: Warne.Google Scholar