Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T13:09:22.219Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Structure and Abundance of Receptors of the Unspecialized External Epithelium of Nassarius Reticulatus [Gastropoda, Prosobranchia]

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

Mary Crisp
Mary Crisp
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The epithelial receptors of Nassarius are primary sense cells. The sensory endings are abundant on the tentacle tips, anterior border of the foot and ventral external surface of the siphon tip. Densities are a small multiple of 1032 endings/mm2.

Type 1 ciliated endings are of ubiquitous occurrence. The ultrastructure of type 1 endings is uniform, though the static and motile bundles of sensory cilia may be distinguished by the random or uniform orientation of the ciliary subfibrils and basal feet. Ciliated receptors probably include both chemo- and mechanoreceptors.

A distinct ultrastructural type of sensory ending (type 2), confined to the siphon tip, consists of a small pit in the peripheral dendrite close to the epithelialsurface. The pit contains whorled microvilli and a few cilia. It may be photoreceptive.

A small amount of convergence of sensory information may occur in peripheral nerve.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 51 , Issue 4 , November 1971 , pp. 865 - 890
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Amoroso, E. C Baxter, M. I. Chiquoine, A. D. &Nisbet, R. H. 1964. The fine structure of neurones and other elements in the nervous system of the giant Africansnail Archachatina marginata.Proc. R. Soc. B, Vol. 160, pp. 167–80.Google Scholar
Barber, V. C. & Dilly, P. N. 1969. Some aspects of the fine structure of the statocysts of the molluscs Pecten and Pterotrachea. Z. Zellforsch. mikrosk. Anat., Bd. 94, pp. 462–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barber, V. C. & Wright, D. E. 1969a. The fine structure of the eye and optic tentacle of the mollusc Cardium edule. J.Ultrastract. Res., Vol. 26, pp. 515–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barber, V. C. & Wright, D. E. 1969b. The fine structure of the sense organs of the cephalopod mollusc Nautilus. Z. Zellforsch. mikrosk. Anat., Bd. 102, pp. 293–312.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benjamin, P. R. & Peat, A. 1968. Myoneural junctions in the connective tissue sheath of a Molluscan ganglion. Nature, Lond., Vol. 219, pp. 1371–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boer, H. H. Douma, E. & Koksma, J. M. A. 1968. Electron microscope study of neurosecretory cells and neurohaemal organs in the pond snail Lymnaea stagnalis. Symp. zool. Soc. Lond., Vol. 22, pp. 237–56.Google Scholar
Boll, F. 1869. Beitrage zur vergleichenden Histologie des Molluskentypus. Arch. Mikrosk. Anat. EntwMech., Bd. 5 (Suppl.), pp. 1–112.Google Scholar
Bovbjerg, R. V. 1968 Responses to food in lymnaeid snails. Physiol. Zool., Vol. 41, pp. 412–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowden, J. 1958. The structure and innervation of lamellibranch muscle. Int. Rev. Cytol., Vol. 7, PP. 295–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, A. C. & Noble, R. G. 1960. Function of the osphradium in Bullia (Gastropoda). Nature, Lond., Vol., 188, p. 1045.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carr, W. E. S. 1967. Chemoreception in the mud snail, Nassarius obsoletus. Biol. Bull. mar. biol. Lab., Woods Hole, Vol. 133, pp. 90–127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Charles, G. H. 1966. Sense organs (less Cephalopods). In Physiology of Mollusca (ed. K. M. Wilbur and C. M. Yonge), pp. 455–511. New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Claparede, E. 1857. Anatomie und Entwicklungsgeschichte der Neritina fluviatilis. Arch. anat. physiol. u. wiss. med., pp. 109–248.Google Scholar
Copeland, M. 1918. The olfactory reactions and organs ofthe marine snails Alectrion obsoleta (Say) and Busycon canaliculatum (Linn.). J. exp. Zool., Vol. 25, pp. 177–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crofts, D. R. 1929. Haliotis. L.M.B.C. Mem., 29. viii, 174 pp.Google Scholar
Edmunds, M. 1966. Protective mechanisms in the Eolidacea. J. Linn. Soc. {Zool.), Vol. 46, pp. 27–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flemming, W. 1869. Die haartragenden Sinneszellen in derOberhaut der Mollusken. Arch. Mikrosk. Anat. EntwMech., Bd. 5, pp. 415–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flemming, W. 1884. Uber Organe vom Bau der Geschmacksknospen an den Tastern verschiedener Mollusken. Arch. Mikrosk. Anat. EntwMech., Bd. 23, pp. 141–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geuze, J. J. 1968. Observations on the function and structure of the statocysts of Lymnaea stagnalis. Neth. J. Zool., Vol. 18, pp. 155–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbons, I. R. 1961. The relationship between the fine structure and directionof beat in gill cilia of a lamellibranch mollusc. J.biophys. biochem. Cytol., Vol. 11, pp. 179–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonatas, N. K. & Robbins, E. 1964. The homology of spindle tubules and neurotubules in the chick embryo retina. Protoplasma, Vol. 59, pp. 377–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodrich, E. S. 1942. A new method of dissociating cells. Q. Jl microsc. Sci., Vol. 83, pp. 245–58.Google Scholar
Graziadei, P. P. C. 1964. Electron microscopy of some primary receptors in the sucker of Octopus vulgaris. Z. Zellforsch. mikrosk.Anat., Bd. 64, pp. 510–22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hertwig, O. & Hertwig, R. 1878. Das Nervensystem und die Sinnesorgane der Medusen. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Land, M. F. 1968. Functional aspects of the optical and retinal organisation of the mollusc eye. Symp. zool. Soc. Lond., Vol.23, 75–96.Google Scholar
Laverack, M. S. & Bailey, D. F. 1963. Movement receptors in Buccinum undatum. Comp. Biochem. Physiol, Vol. 8, pp. 289–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merton, H. 1920. Untersuchungen iiber die Hautsinnessorgane der Mollusken. Abh. senkenb. naturforsch. Ges., Bd. 36, pp. 447–73.Google Scholar
Okano, M. Weber, A. F. & Frommes, S. P. 1967. Electron-microscopic studies on the distal border of canine olfactory epithelium. J. Ultrastruct. Res., Vol. 17, pp. 487–502.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pantin, C. F. A. 1964. Notes on Microscopical Technique for Zoologists. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pielou, E. C 1969. An Introduction to Mathematical Ecology. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Google Scholar
PiÉron, H. 1908. Le sens chimique des Limnees. C. r. Ass. fr. Avanc. Sci., Vol. 2, pp. 603–8.Google Scholar
Renzoni, A. 1968. Osservazione istologiche, istochimicheed ultra-strutturali sui tentacoli de Vaginulus borellianus (Colosi), Gastropoda, Soleolifera. Z. Zellforsch. mikrosk. Anat., Bd. 87, PP. 350–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, E. S. 1963. The use of lead citrate at high pHas an electron-opaque stain in electron microscopy. J. Cell Biol., Vol. 17, pp. 208–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowell, C. H. F. 1963. A general method for silvering invertebrate central nervous systems. Q. Jl microsc. Sci., Vol. 104, pp. 81–7.Google Scholar
Schlote, F.-W. 1957. Submikroscopische Morphologie von Gastroponennerven. Z. Zellforsch. mikrosk. Anat., Bd. 45, pp. 543–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlote, F.-W. 1963. Neurosekretartige Grana in den peripheren Nerven und in den NervMuskel-Verbindungen von Helix pomatia. Z. Zellforsch. mikrosk. Anat., Bd. 60, pp. 325–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulz, F. 1937. Bau und Function der Sinneszellen in der Korper-Oberflache von Helix pomatia. Z. Morph. Okol. Tiere., Bd. 33, pp. 555–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storch, V. & Welsch, U. 1969. Uber Aufbau und Innervation der Kopfanhange der prosobranchen Schnecken. Z. Zellforsch. mikrosk. Anat., Bd. 102, pp. 419–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Venable, J. H. & Coggeshall, R. 1965. A simplified lead citrate stain for use in electron microscopy. J. Cell. Biol., Vol. 25, pp. 407–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wells, M. J. 1963. Taste by touch: some experiments withOctopus. J. exp. Biol., Vol. 40, pp. 187–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wersall, J. Flock, A. & Lundquist, P.-G. 1965. Structural basis for directional sensitivity in cochlear and vestibularsensory receptors. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. quant. Biol., Vol. 30, pp. 115–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolper, C 1950. Das Osphradium der Paludina vivipara. Z. vergl. Physiol., Bd. 32, pp. 272–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar