Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T13:41:36.340Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of water conservation on the structure of marine fish embryos and larvae

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

J. E. Shelbourne
J. E. Shelbourne
Affiliation:
Fisheries Laboratory, Lowestoft
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Fish eggs can be divided into three main groups: marine pelagic eggs which float of their own accord, marine demersal, and freshwater demersal eggs. The embryological development of freshwater teleosts follows an accepted pattern, demonstrated by morphologists during the nineteenth century. Marine embryos, both pelagic and demersal, do not conform in all respects to this pattern, and misunderstandings have frequently arisen by lack of attention to known structural differences between the three groups. Mclntosh & Prince (1890), in their comprehensive review offish development, emphasized some outstanding anomalies in pelagic structure, but gave no adequate explanation of their occurrence.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 35 , Issue 1 , February 1956 , pp. 275 - 286
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1956

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baldwin, E., 1937. An Introduction to Comparative Biochemistry. 112 pp. CambridgeUniversity Press.Google Scholar
Bigelow, H. B. & Welsh, W. W., 1925. Fishes of the Gulf of Maine. Bull. U.S. Bur. Fish., Vol. 40 (1924), 567 pp.Google Scholar
Copeland, D. E., 1948. The cytological basis of chloride transfer in the gills of Fundulus heteroclitus. J. Morph., Vol. 82, pp. 201–28.Google Scholar
Darin, W. J., 1912. Aquatic animals and their environment. The constitution of the external medium, and its effect upon the blood. Int. Rev. Hydrobiol., Bd. 5, No. 1, pp. 53–80.Google Scholar
D'ancona, U. & Sanzo, L., 1931. Uova, larve e stadi giovanili di Teleostei. Fauna u. Flora Neapel, Monogr. 38, 177 pp.Google Scholar
Ehrenbaum, E., 1904. Eier und Larven von Fischen der Deutschen Bucht. III. Fische mit festsitzenden Eiern. Wiss. Meeresuntersuch., Abt. Helgoland, Bd. 6, pp. 129–200.Google Scholar
Ehrenbaum, E., 1905–9. Eier und Larven von Fischen. Nord. Plankt., Bd. 1, 413 pp.Google Scholar
Fish, M. P., 1931. Contributions to the early life histories of sixty-two species of fishes from Lake Erie and its tributary waters. Bull. U.S. Bur. Fish., Vol. 47 (1931–33). PP. 293–398.Google Scholar
Fullarton, J. H., 1891. On the development of the plaice. Rep. Fish. Bd Scot. 9th Year (1890), Pan III, pp. 311–16.Google Scholar
Fulton, T. W., 1898. On the growth and maturation of the ovarian eggs of teleostean fishes. Rep. Fish. Bd Scot., 16th Year (1897), Part III, pp. 88–124.Google Scholar
Gray, J., 1932. The osmotic properties of the eggs of the trout (Salmo fario). J. exp. Biol., Vol. 9, pp. 277–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hildebrand, S. F. & Cable, L. E., 1938. Further notes on the development and life history of some teleosts at Beaufort, N. C. Bull. U.S. Bur. Fish., Vol. 48 (1933–38), pp. 505–642.Google Scholar
Hoar, W. S., Black, V. S. & Black, E. C., 1951. Some aspects of the physiology of fish. II. Osmotic regulation in teleost fishes. Publ. Out. Fish. Res. Lab., No. 71, pp. 53–89.Google Scholar
Jacobsen, J. P. & Johansen, A. C., 1908. Remarks on the changes in specific gravity of pelagic fish eggs and the transportation of same in Danish waters. Medd. Kotrtm. Havundersog., Kbh., Ser. Fisk., Bd. 3, No. 2, pp. 1–24.Google Scholar
Keys, A. B., 1931. Chloride and water secretion and absorption by the gills of the eel. Z. vergl. Physiol, Bd. 15, pp. 364–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keys, A. B. & Willmer, E. N., 1932. ‘Chloride secreting cells’ in the gills of fishes, with special reference to the common eel. J. Physiol., Vol. 76, pp. 368–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kopec, J. A., 1949. Ecology, Breeding Habits And Young Stages Of Crenichthys Baileyi, A Cyprinodont Fish Of Nevada. Copeia, No. 1, pp. 56–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koster, W. J., 1948. Notes on the spawning activities and young stages of Plancterus kansae (Garman). Copeia, No. 1, pp. 25–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krogh, A., with the collaboration of Agnes, Krogh & Wernstedt, C., 1938. The salt concentration in the tissues of some marine animals. Skand. Arch. Physiol., Bd. 80, pp. 214–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krogh, A. & Ussing, H. H., 1937. A note on the permeability of trout eggs to D2O and H2O. J. exp. Biol, Vol. 14, pp. 35–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loeb, J. S. & Wasteneys, H., 1915. Note on the apparent change of the osmotic pressure of cell contents with the osmotic pressure of the surrounding solution. J. biol. Chem., Vol. 23, pp. 157–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mcintosh, W. C. & Prince, E. E., 1890. On the development and life histories of the teleostean food—and other fishes. Trans, roy. Soc. Edinb., Vol. 35, pp. 665–944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meek, A., 1913. The organisation of the teleostean egg. Rep. Dove Marine Lab., 1913, pp. 85–95.Google Scholar
Meek, A., 1924. The development of the cod (Gadus callarias L.). Fish. Invest., Lond., Ser. 2, Vol. 7, No. 1, 26 pp.Google Scholar
Milroy, T. H., 1898. The physical and chemical changes taking place in the ova of certain marine teleosteans during maturation. Rep. Fish. Bd Scot., 16th Year (1897), Part III, pp. 135–52…Google Scholar
Moore, G. A., 1944. Notes on the early life history of Notropis girardi. Copeia, No. 4, pp. 209–14.Google Scholar
Moy-Thomas, J. A., 1939. Monographs on Biological Subjects. Palaeozoic Fishes. 149 pp. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Ahmad, Nazir, 1944. The Spawning Habits And Early Stages In The Development Of The Carp, Labeo Gonius (Hamilton), With Hints For Distinguishing Eggs, Embryos And Larvae Of Labeo Gonius, Cirrhina Mrigala And Wallagonia Attu. Proc. nat. Inst. Sci. India, Vol. 10, pp. 343–54.Google Scholar
Romer, A. S. & Grove, B. H., 1935. Environment of the early vertebrates. Amer. Midi. Nat. Vol. 16, pp. 805–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuart, T. A., 1953. Spawning migration, reproduction and young stages of Loch trout (Salmo trutta L.). Scottish Home Dept. Freshwater and Salmon Fish. Res., No. 5, 39 pp.Google Scholar
Svetlow, P., 1929. Entwicklungsphysiologische Beobachtungen an Forelleneiern. Arch. EntwMech. Org., Bd. 114, pp. 771–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vrat, Ved, 1949. Reproduction behaviour and development of eggs of the threespined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) of California. Copeia, No. 4, pp. 252–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weisel, G. F. & Newman, H. W., 1951. Breeding habits, development and early life history of Richardsonius balteatus, a north-western minnow. Copeia, No. 3, pp. 187–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar