Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-18T05:33:18.709Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The ecological and geographical aspects of the fecundity of the plaice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

T. B. Bagenal
T. B. Bagenal
Affiliation:
The Ferry House, Ambleside, England
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

During the last 30 years the fecundity of the plaice, Pleuronectes platessa L., has been widely studied over its complete geographical range. In this paper all this previous work is brought together and a distinct pattern (with two exceptions) emerges. The fecundity is lowest in the Southern Bight of the North Sea, and radiating from there in all directions the fecundity increases, while in Faxa Bay (Iceland) and in the Barents Sea it is lower again. The possible factors producing this pattern are examined in detail and it is concluded that the amount of food available, which in turn is related to population density, is the most important. Only in Trondheim Fjord and in the Baltic is the fecundity so different that it is necessary to postulate racially distinct populations. Finally the importance of fecundity variations in natural population regulation is stressed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 46 , Issue 1 , February 1966 , pp. 161 - 186
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1966

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ahlstrom, E. H., 1954. Distribution and abundance of egg and larval populations of the pacific sardine. Fishery Bull. Fish Wildl. Serv. U.S., Vol. 56, pp. 83–140.Google Scholar
Anokhina, L. E., 1959. On the relation between the fertility and fatness in the Baltic herring Clupea harengus membras L. Dokl. Akad. Nauk. S.S.S.R., Vol. 129 (6), pp. 1417–20.Google Scholar
Anokhina, L. E., 1963. Some aspects of the fecundity of the herring in the White Sea. Rapp.P.-v. Reun. perm. Cons. Explor. Mer, Vol. 154, pp. 123–7.Google Scholar
Bagenal, M., 1955. A note on the relations of certain parameters following a logarithmic transformation. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 34, pp. 289–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagenal, T. B., 1957a. The breeding and fecundity of the Long Rough Dab Hippoglossoid.es platessoides (Fabr.) and the associated cycle in condition. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 36, pp. 339–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagenal, T. B., 1957b. Annual variations in fish fecundity. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 36, pp. 377–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagenal, T. B., 1958. The fecundity of Clyde plaice. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 37, pp. 309–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagenal, T. B., 1960a. The fecundity of English Channel plaice. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 39, pp. 249–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagenal, T. B., 1960b. The fecundity of plaice from the south and west coasts of Ireland. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 39, pp. 255–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagenal, T. B., 1962. The fecundity of plaice from the coasts of Norway. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 42, pp. 105–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagenal, T. B., 1963a. The fecundity of plaice from the Bay of Biscay. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 43, pp. 177–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagenal, T. B., 1963b. The fecundity of Icelandic plaice. J. mar. biol.Ass.U.k, Vol.43, pp.181–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagenal, T. B. 1963c. Variations in plaice fecundity in the Clyde area. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 43, pp. 391–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagenal, T. B. 1963d. The fecundity of witches in the Firth of Clyde. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 43, pp. 401–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagenal, T. B. 1965. The fecundity of long rough dabs in the Clyde Sea Area. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 45, pp. 599–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baxter, I. G., 1959. Fecundities of winter-spring and summer-autumn herring spawners. J. Cons. perm. int. Explor. Mer, Vol. 25, pp. 73–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beverton, R. J. H., 1962. Long term dynamics of certain North Sea populations. In The Exploitation of Natural Animal Populations, edited by Le Cren, E. D. and Holdgate, M. W.. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Blaxter, J. H. S. & Hempel, G., 1963. The influence of egg size on herring larvae (Clupea harengus L.). J. Cons. perm. int. Explor. Mer., Vol. 28, pp. 211–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blegvad, H., 1935. Transplanations of plaice from the North Sea to the Baelt Sea. 1928–1933. Rep. Dan. biol. Stn, Vol. 39, pp. 9–84.Google Scholar
Bridger, J. P., 1961. On the fecundity and larval abundance of Downs herring. Fishery Invest., Lond., Ser. 2, Vol. 23.Google Scholar
Dahl, K., 1918–19. Studies of trout and trout waters in Norway. Salm. Trout Mag., Vol. 17, pp. 58–79, and Vol. 18, pp. 16–33.Google Scholar
Devold, F., 1935. The susceptibility of plaice eggs to shock. K. norske Vidensk. Selsk. Fork. Bd. 8, pp. 71–4.Google Scholar
Devold, F., 1942. Plaice investigations in Norwegian waters. FiskDir. Skr. Serie Havundersekelser, Bd. 7, No. 3.Google Scholar
Farran, G. P., 1938. On the size and number of the ova of Irish herrings. J. Cons. perm. int. Explor. Mer, Vol. 13, pp. 91–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franz, V., 1910a. Die Eiproduktion der Scholle (Pleuronectes platessa L.). Wiss. Meeresunters., Helgoland, N.F., Vol. 9, pp. 59–141.Google Scholar
Franz, V., 1910b. Zur Eiproduktion der Scholle (Pleuronectes platessa L.) Nachtrage. Wiss. Meeresunters., Helgoland, N.F., Vol. 9, pp. 217–24.Google Scholar
Fulton, T. W., 1891. The comparative fecundity of sea-fishes. Rep. Fishery Bd Scotl., Vol. 9 (1890), Part III, pp. 243–68.Google Scholar
Gerking, S. D., 1959. Physiological changes accompanying ageing in fishes. Ciba. Fdn Symp., on ‘The Lifespan of Animals’, pp. 181–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardy, A. C, 1959, The open sea: Its natural history. Part II. Fish and fisheries. London.Google Scholar
Hempel, G. & Blaxter, J. H. S., 1963. On the condition of herring larvae. Rapp. P.-v. Reun. Cons. perm. Explor. Mer, Vol. 154, pp. 35–40.Google Scholar
Hester, F. J., 1964. Effects of food supply on fecundity in the female guppy Lebistes reticulatus (Peters). J. Fish. Res. Bd Can., Vol. 21, pp 757–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hjort, J., 1914. Fluctuations in the great fisheries of northern Europe, viewed in the light of biological research. Rapp. P.-v. Reun. Cons. perm. int. Explor. Mer, Vol. 20.Google Scholar
Johansen, A. C, 1907. Contributions to the biology of the plaice with special regard to the Danish plaice-fishery. II. The marking and transplantation experiments with plaice in the Danish waters in the years 1903–06. Meddr. Komm. Havunders., Bd. 11, No. 5.Google Scholar
Kandler, R., 1959. tiber die Fruchtbarkeit der Scholle im Kattegat. Kieler Meeresforsch., Bd. 15, pp. 29–33.Google Scholar
Kandler, R. & Dutt, S., 1958. Fecundity of Baltic herring. Rapp. P.-v. Reun. Cons. perm. int. Explor. Mer, Vol. 143, pp. 99–108.Google Scholar
Kandler, R. & Pirwitz, W., 1957. Uber die Fruchtbarkeit der Plattfische im Nordsee-Ostsee-Raum. Kieler Meeresforsch., Bd. 13, pp. 11–34.Google Scholar
Krivobok, M. N., 1961. The relationship between the spawning time and fecundity of Clupea harengus membras. Trudy vses. nauchno-issled. Inst. morsk. ryb. Khoz. Okeanogr., Vol. 44, pp. 160–3.Google Scholar
Lack, D., 1947. The significance of clutch size. Ibis, Vol. 89, pp. 302–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lack, D., 1948a. The significance of clutch size. Ibis, Vol. 90, pp. 25–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lack, D., 1948b. The significance of litter size. J. Anim. Ecol., Vol. 17, pp. 45–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
L E Cren, E. D., 1951. The length-weight relationship and seasonal cycle in gonad weight and condition in the perch (Perca fluviatilis). J. Anim. Ecol., Vol. 20, pp. 201–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milinski, G. I., 1938. Biology and fishery of the plaice (Pleuronectes platessa) in the Barents Sea. Trudy polyar. nauchno-issled. Inst. morsk. ryb. Khoz. Okeanogr., Vol. 2, pp. 59–92. (In Russian with English summary.)Google Scholar
Mitchell, A. M., 1913. On the egg production of certain fishes. Rep. N. Sea Fish. Invest. Comm., 5th Report (Northern Area), pp. 191–204.Google Scholar
Nordgaard, O., 1913. Enkelte iakttagelser over temperatur og saltgehalt i Trondhjemsfjorden. K. norske Vidensk. Selsk. Skr., 1912, No. 6.Google Scholar
Petrova, E. G., 1960. On the fecundity and maturation of the Baltic sprat. Trudy vses. nauchno-issled. Inst. morsk. ryb. Khoz. Okeanogr., Vol. 42, pp. 99–108.Google Scholar
Poulsen, E. M., 1932. Analyses of stock and race of the Baltic plaice during recent years. Rep. Dan. biol. Stn, Vol. 37, No. 3, pp. 37–58.Google Scholar
Poulsen, E. M., 1939. On the migrations and racial character of the plaice. Rep. Dan. biol. Stn, Vol. 43, pp. 1–58.Google Scholar
Reibisch, J., 1899. Uber die Eizahl bei Pleuronectes platessa und die Altersbestimmung dieser Form aus den Otolithen. Wiss. Meeresunters., Bd. 4, pp. 231–48.Google Scholar
Rollefsen, G., 1940. Utklekning og oppdretning av saltvannsfisk. Naturen, pp. 197–217.Google Scholar
Scott, D. P., 1962. Effect of food quantity on fecundity of Rainbow Trout Salmo gairdneri. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can., Vol. 19, pp. 715–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segerstrale, S. G., 1957. Baltic Sea. In Treatise on Marine Ecology and Paleoecology Vol. 1, pp. 751–800. Ed. Hedgepeth, J. W.. Mem. geol. Soc.Am., No. 67. New York.Google Scholar
Sette, O. E., 1943. Biology of the Atlantic mackerel (Scomber scombrus) of North America. Part I. Early life history, including growth, drift and mortality of the egg and larval populations. Fishery Bull. Fish Wildl. Serv. U.S., Vol. 50, pp. 149–237.Google Scholar
Shelbourne, J. E., 1957. The feeding and condition of plaice larvae in good and bad plankton patches. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K., Vol. 36, pp. 539–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, A. C, 1951a. The fecundity of the plaice. Fishery Invest., Lond., Ser. 2, Vol.17.Google Scholar
Simpson, A. C, 1952b. Review of Svardson (1949). J. Cons. perm. int. Explor. Mer, Vol. 17, pp. 198–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, A. C, 1959. The spawning of the plaice in the North Sea. Fishery Invest., Lond., Ser. 2, Vol. 22.Google Scholar
Smyly, W. J. P., 1957. The life-history of the bullhead or Miller's Thumb (Cottus gobio L.). Proc. zool. Soc. Lond., Vol. 128, pp. 431–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svardson, G., 1949. Natural selection and egg number in fish. Rep. Inst. Freshwat. Res. Drottningholm, No. 29, pp. 115–22.Google Scholar
Taning, A. V., 1929. Plaice investigations in Icelandic waters. Rapp. P.-v. Reun. Cons. perm. Explor. Mer, Vol. 57.Google Scholar
Taning, A. V., 1948. The plaice in Faxa Bay. Rapp. P.-v. Reun. Cons. perm. Explor. Mer, Vol. 120, pp. 39–45.Google Scholar
Thomsen, H., 1948. The hydrographic conditions in Faxa Bay. Rapp. P.-v. Reun. Cons. perm. Explor. Mer, Vol. 120, pp. 30–1.Google Scholar
Todd, R. A., 1915. Report on the food of plaice. Fishery Invest., Lond., Ser. 2, Vol. 2, No. 3.Google Scholar
Wimpenny, R. S., 1953. The Plaice. London.Google Scholar